You tell him. Hey, by the way, Obama thinks you're stupid! Without stupid voters Obamacare could have never passed. Stupid! Stupid! Stupid! And, yeah, he was talking about you & your ilk.
The Nazis started out torturing their enemies and in the end turned on their own people. Keep being apologists for the torturers you idiots.
I think moron joe is every bit as stupid as the democrap party leadership believes him to be. As for torture? The temporary discomfort of terrorists, who want only to kill us, is something I do not care about. If it will save a single US life I say crank it up!!!! Waterboarding, sleep deprivation & solitary confinement are nothing compared to beheadings, rapes, burning alive and whatever else these terrorists routinely use. Would you feel differently if torture could save the life of your kid? Will/can you answer this honestly?
Hey apologist for torturers.... So you don't think we should investigate possible war crimes even though they were detailed in a rather comprehensive report? Really? But investigating baseless conspiracy theories 6 times costing millions of dollars and producing nothing is just fine? What's the matter? No political points to gain this time by exploiting the deaths of brave American heros. WHAT A BUNCH OF TOTAL HYPOCRITES YOU ARE.
Would you condone a waterboarding session if the info obtained could possibly save the life of your son?
Stupid hypothical to say the least. Torture is a line civilized countries do not cross. I personally would torture the hell out of someone to save any child's life but that is entirely different than State sanctioned torture. We prosecute people for that behavior. Now what credibility do we have in that arena and what right do we have to expect other countries not to torture US military personnel? We have none! Thank you Republicans.
You government haters are really defending the worst behavior any government can exhibit. That doesn't feel wrong to you? How politically convenient for you.
I am still waiting for you to explain why water-boarding is worse than killing. Or even rationing health care?
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for a moment. Please tell us what makes it morally tolerant for one person to torture another person (for whatever reason) as opposed to a group of people torturing another group of people (for whatever reason)? Also, for purposes of your example, please define "torture the hell out of someone".
This is typical Republican logic. They are against gay marriage until they find out their son is gay. Republicans are against the Affordable Care Act until they have a stroke. Republicans are against anything they can't envision themselves being affected by. Perhaps the only way to make them see that torture is reprehensibly immoral is to torture a few of them. We can put John McCain in charge of that program.
Yet you said you would torture someone depending on the circumstances. However, you would still consider it wrong. So, why torture someone? Also, please tell us what your definition of "torture the hell out of someone" is. Specifically, please.
If only you were as clever as you thought you were. What I, or you, or anyone else would do to save their own kids really has no limits and you know that and you also know that State sponsored torture is entirely different. There was no phony live or die situation that justifies what the Bush Administration did thousands of times to hundreds of people. You know that too but you pretend to be clever when all you do ask leading questions while answering none. It's pretty pathetic idiot and shows your immaturity as usual. Grow up.