Last time I checked, the definition to ignorance is -- n. The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed. I could have used a harsher word, but I thought I would be nice. IF I am the ignorant one who thinks Fanatical Muslims ARE attacking us then I stand corrected. IF people in here DON'T think Fanatical Muslims are attacking us then he is the one who is ignorant. Wouldn't that be a fair comparison MOEN? Is the US being attacked by Fanatical Muslims MOEN? That is only a YES or NO question MOEN, you dont have to go into some sort of dissertation as Clinton does to define IS? A yes or no will suffice.
I'm sure you crave black and white answer so I'll say Al Qaeda has already expressed a desire to attack us if they get the chance. In that respect there are fanatical Muslims that would love to infict as much damage to this country as possible. But, your question is in the present tense, "Is the US being attacked by Fanatical Muslims MOEN?", No we are not at the moment being attacked that I know of but I haven't watched the news yet. Was there a point to this question? It doesn't really answer my question to you; If someone disagrees with you, are they just ingnorant, stupid, dumb, etc.?
Damnit, MOEN. You just said another ignorant statement. Is your name MOEN CLINTON? You are more ignorant than I gave you credit for. What in my statement did you read so much into that would bring you to the conclusion I meant RIGHT NOW, RIGHT NOW we are being attacked? I only asked you if we were being attacked by Fanatical Muslims. What a cheesy attempt to correct yourself. You are pathetic.
Don't blame me because you can't properly form a question. Try asking the question you really want to ask and not couching it in inexplicit terms.
No, how about you comprehending what I am ACTUALLY saying in the present tense to your idiotic ass. Don't most people talk in the present tense about events that have happened in the past? I think it happens everyday in my world. But nowhere in my question to you said anything about us being attacked RIGHT NOW. Stop trying to mince words. You libs are great at that. You wont get away with it by me.
He has similar sentiments but more passion than I. That doesn't make him an idiot anymore that it makes you one. Continually calling people names doesn't really lend you much credibility here but it probably makes you feel better.
People speak in the tense that is actually relevant to the conversation at hand. I suspect you had your own world or planet anyway. At least "Libs" answer questions. You still won't answer mine.
I can't answer your questions when I am constantly correcting what you think I said to you. You are a headcase. Answering your posts is exhausting. I have to correct you after each post and I get nowhere. I have to take a break from you MOEN. Please someone else waste their time with this ass. You really have to stop. You are killing me.
I call it, constantly reminding people. And when has calling people a name have anything to do with whether that has anything to do with credibility? Man, you are full of yourself aren't you? I suppose you also write some sort of outer-world (Your world) credibility law based on whether or not a name has been said/typed in the same breath! Congratulations on being called an idiot again in another post of mine. Starting to see a trend here.
It has always been this way...Name calling is the basest thing you can do and exposes you as just a childish bully who reverts to taunts and insults when confronted. Calling anyone who disagrees with you an ignorant, idiot, evil, 'my enemy', etc...etc... you just cant hear and counter an argument you dont agree with without hurling insults...the absurd thing about the whole thing is that you seem to expect the people you insult to continue the exchange or care what you have to say...It become more about your insulting behaviour than any point you were trying to make. Just remember...nobody THINKS they are ignorant or stupid...everyone thinks they are pretty smart...those people you call ignorant dont think they are...and might think you are....and the guy calling everyone around him stupid...might might be too stupid to realize he is more stupid than all of them. Nice little saying I heard once: 'Those who scream the loudest often have the least to say'
If you can't understand why labeling people as idiots undermines your arguements, then it is beyond my abilities to explain how your credibility is weakened in the process. I don't think I am dealing with a tower of intellect here in any case.
If you truly are an IDIOT and I call you an IDIOT then how is that undermining my argument jerkass. Your explanations are accepted in your WORLD not mine. You are still and ignorant idiot.
you are cracking me up. I am smiling from ear to ear reading this. You are surreal to the extreme.:hatch:
Well, it's about time you noticed! Aren't you aware of the fact that the term "idiot' is actually a derivation of the word 'Moen'. Oh yes, it makes no difference which tense it is being used.:whistle:
the last one is my fav... I do notice a trend here...and this is just one thread...I have to admit as I was collecting these I just started laughing
You can try and talk to people reasonably and make points but if they are unwilling to hear anything but the noises in their own heads, it's sort of a waste of time. Not all people from the Right are this way certainly but the ones that are really bring down the credibility of the rest by association. I like to call it the Rush Limbaugh effect because anytime someone makes a valid point he opposes or can't refute, he simply labels as some type of Liberal or another and screams them down. He, at least does it for entertainment and ratings. My only regret is when I crawl into the mud with people like this. Sometimes it just gets so old you just want to scream back and behave like they do, but then you realize it would be better to try and lift them out of the mud. That's the hard part, because it doesn't matter how much you dress up the pig, it's still a pig. The basic education just isn't there to work with. I guess the best thing to really do is ignore them. They only try to annoy you with psuedo-witticisms that keep them ROTFLMAO as they say and somehow I can picture them doing it. I think OldDan has to be the saddest case though. How would you like to be in your 80's and be that immature and childish. I can understand John W. Evans at least. He is your typical mindless drone of a Jarhead. They don't need to think to pull the trigger and they serve a purpose. I just think he is really stretching his limitations trying to participate in this forum. I think with such a considerable string of absolutely nothing to say, he is a prime candidate for the ignore list. What would you really be missing anyway?