Wow! It Didn't Take Long for the Republicans to Break That Promise

Well, I didn't want to offend Moen since he thought it best that I stay out of the conversation.

You're speaking of Mark Kirk I presume... GO MARK KIRK! We need more people like him!!!!!

 

What do his wants have to do with anything?

You presume correctly. The one that surprises me, though, is the president of the MIT alumnae. He was almost my little brother. I knew he was sharp, but I did not think he was that sharp.

 

You should be very proud of him. Not just anyone can accomplish that (nor what Mark Kirk accomplished either). It looks like your school turned out at least 3 brilliant minds that I'm aware of....

 

If you are talking just the school, a fellow graduate almost made prime minister of Canada last go around even if he is more famous for his sporting accomplishments. Perhaps you have heard of Ken Dryden. Problem is, he is on Moen's side of the fence. Or if you want an odd couple, how about Ann Coulter and Keith Olbermann - both of them!

 

I guess Mr. Moen has given up on his possessive, his impotant, his either are, his contraction of somebody has = somebody's, etc.

 

Tooooooooo funny! That was good! I laughed out loud when I read that!!!!!

 

Came and went again at least twice without making any further comment. I guess he has conceded that I am correct.

BTW, my shot at your educational level in addition to my always hilarious signature line jab is a direct quote of your statement. I even time stamped it. If you do not like it, retract and apologize. Until such time, you said it so now you can live with it. Maybe that is the difference between you and me. My shot at you education offends you (even though it is your direct quote), but your comment on my being "Southern educated" I thought was hilarious even though it is an unsubstantiated lie and totally baseless that I can easily prove to be totally false - and that is assuming that there is something wrong with the southern education system. Now that would be an interesting hypothesis for you to prove.

 

I was just having fun watching you two circle jerk each other into a carnal frenzy. Your original sentence was grammatically incorrect and you still defend it. I figure that if you'll defend something as silly are incorrect grammar this single-mindedly, there is certainly no point in bringing up an issue of consequence with someone that has NEVER admitted to being wrong about anything because they are just too wrapped up in their own ego. I've been wrong in the past and I'm sure I'll be wrong in the future but in this instance I happen to be right. This is the reason that I have no interest in listening to extreme Right-wingers such as yourself. You're just too dumb to know how just how dumb you really are. OK guys! Reform circle.

 

You have tried possessive. You lost. You tried changing it to a grammatical mistake. You have apparently lost there. You tried insults, which I guess is to change the topic, and you are still getting no where. So you try some different insults. Do you really believe either of those attempts are making an impression on me?. (I am guessing that are how you are supposed to use either as a plural. I am sure you can correct me if it are wrong.)

 

RLM.. STOP IT! My sides are hurting! You've got me rolling with laughter!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I say, my good man, could you pass the grey poupon??

 

Mr. Moen,

You are going to drop your insults here and move them to another thread?

 

Anyone heard the latest? Kind of belies this thread's title.

Republicans' Budget Will Cut $100 Billion of Federal Spending, Rogers Says - Bloomberg

 

Yeah, it really off-sets the 678 billion in tax breaks for the wealthiest 2%. Way to go Republicans! That's a net of 578 billion increase to the deficit.