Yeah, how does Trump take a business like a casino (which is pretty much a license to print money) and bankrupt it three different times? The man has got skills! The average Indian tribe seems to have more business sense.
You know nothing about casinos and the average Indian tribes only make money because they are legalized monopolies. What are your business credentials? Oh wait, you never answer questions about your own credentials. But you want us to believe that you are more savvy than one of the most famous real estate businessmen of the last 30 years. Is there no end to your egotism?
A lot of people are falling for his hogwash. Why would any sane Chairman of the Board hire someone who has had to file for bankrupsy once let alone multiple times for the job as his CEO? The Donald should shack up with Lady Gaga, and then and only then will I consider him a viable candidate for the office of President of the United States.
There's something about a guy that considers beautiful women a ''great piece of ass*'' a great contender for the presidency *An actual quote from Trump
The only Trump I'm into is Ivanka, or at least I'd like to be. The Donald may be a complete charlatan but he sure can produce a fine looking kid. View attachment 159
Honestly, I think Trump actually WOULD do a better job than the current President or his immediate predecessor. Trump is a first class douche-bag, and way too flamboyant for my tastes, but I can't see him being any worse than President #43 or President #44. Douche-bags actually can be quite successful as Presidents, look at Clinton for example. We actually had a surplus when he left office.
Talking to you is like talking to a bag of wind. However, bags of wind (such as a bagpipes) sometimes make pleasant sounds whereas the noise you make is akin to flatulence. It must just be your lips flapping.
Feel better now? Just remember that you're the one who gets nasty, because one doesn't agree with you. And its only that. You attack like its all personal. You go on and on like you think you're some kind of wordsmith. But you aren't. You only abuse words instead of conserving them to get your point across. You and that other sentence addict are two of a kind. Now if Moen, Tom C or even I wrote such a dumb piece of tripe, you'd've been all over it. You have a great sense for the obvious. Blurt out some more of what everyone already knows.
I think I touched a nerve. Some flatulent nerve. As you've asked me to do, I'll ask the same of you: Keep your sentences short and simple; eleven sentences is quite a bit for you to manage and still keep a running thought (but probably no longer than your college thesis). For the record, I think Trump would make a better president than Obama. But, that's not saying much.
Like I always say, Republicans could reanimate Hitler, put an "R" behind his name, and just be fanatical enough to vote in droves for him in lockstep fashion. But that's not saying anything that isn't true. That is why they are stuck with people like Trump, Palin, Bachmann, and the rest of the cast from a bad farcical comedy. Their standards are just that low. All they can do is attack the Left in defense of their own bad choices. We on the Left will never apologize for electing a black guy even if we knew in advance how much he was going to aggravate your blatant racism. We elected the person we thought would do the best job. It was a tough choice because we had many good candidates to choose from. Not a problem the Right has had in a long time. But when the quality of the candidate is irrelevant because your base will vote for any guy you toss out there, you tend to see no real vetting process going on. Rebranding yourself as Reaganites, Christian conservatives, the moral majority, compassionate conservatives, or the tea party patriots belies that the fact that it is still the same group of old white hardcore racists that have always been the base of the GOP.