Which one will be BO's Watergate??

This or Solyndra?

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf-guns-20111009,0,6431788.story?track=rss

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5I5Z0deBsM&feature=youtu.be

 

Sun-gate or gun-gate... I don't know, I'm kinda waiting for the two to merge so there can be fun-in-the-sun-with-a-gun-gate.

 

It's okay to attempt humor but both of these issues are serious and will soon turn into a criminal conspiracy involving BO & his inner circle. It seems new details are coming out every day which do not reflect positively on ol' Barack Hussein Obama mmm mmm mmm.....

 

Time will tell. I haven't seen enough of the evidence to say one way or another, but politics being politics the lack of evidence isn't an issue, the stigma of an accusation is enough.

 

Your "this" (Fast and Furious) just got a little more interesting; http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20115038-10391695.html. MAybe BO can stay above the fray, but my guess is that Holder is a dead man walking.

 

... and here's another possibly corrupt scandal that may rock the Administration:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ar-firm-won-2b-loan-raises-conflict-interest/

 

... and yet another:

http://news.yahoo.com/another-solyndra-already-worry-even-worse-coming-230828324.html

 

.................. And another
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/oba...lectric-car-company-to-build-cars-in-finland/
Anyone want to guess where this car is made? Oh, and then there are those great (for the oil companies) MPG's.

 

... the scandals just keep coming........

 

Like with the Cain thing? Or the Occupier's thing? I agree, Obama's administration has some explaining to do... and is feeling the heat from these incidents, but would it be fair then for me to treat these "scandals" the same way the right-leaners here treat the Cain and Occupier things? Where "We don't know the facts yet to say one way or another!" rules?

I'm just saying...

 

A-B-S-O-L-U-T-E-L-Y-! It's fine to present the information and let people judge for themselves based on the facts available. But, to crucify someone without facts is just plain evil.

What facts are available in the Cain case? We have accusers and we have a denial. Let's not judge the man until we know the facts.

What facts are available in the Scott Olsen case? He was hit in the head by something. Let's not accuse the police until we know the facts. For all we know, another Flea Party member could have struck him over the head during the smoke and confusion.

I thought it was wrong for people to crucify Anthony Weiner when his scandal broke. But, after his admission of guilt, that was evidence enough for me.

 

Actually, for Cain, the last I heard, we have no accusers. All we have at the moment is some innuendo and what Cain has admitted to.

 

The silence from the BO's apologizers among us is deafening on this subject.....

 

I stand corrected.

 

Really? ....I mean, really? ....no, no... I mean really? Why misrepresent truths? Why even try to twist the truth? I'll never understand you three ...completely... what I've learned so far is disappointing, but not unexpected...

 

Have you been inhaling intoxicating vapors? It sounds like it.

 

Thank you for the attempted insult. Mine was better, and didn't resort to fiction. I do like fiction though, especially science fiction, so I'll accept your apology. Your welcome. Check-mate?

....sorry, those fumes an' all...

 

No apology. No insult intended. I simply asked if you were inhaling toxic vapors and you said no. I'll assume you're imbibing intoxicating beverages instead.

 

Nyet. While I have no issue with drinking, I rarely do. New Years I may buy a bottle of 80 proof whatever, drink half (almost to intoxication) then savor the rest another day. That's about it. Now, when smoking was allowed in bars, and a decent rock-band was playing, I'd drink my fill... maybe even play a tune before I got too tuned meself.