When did I ever say you said anything racial. The fact is that you and Craig both insulted me in this thread without provocation. Even now, in the face of direct indisputable evidence, you can't ever admit that you are wrong. You call me an alcoholic and act surprised when the clown references start flying. You are not at all interested in having any type of debate. You only want to troll the forum and post your propaganda. Even during your 9/11 posts, you would employ trolling tactics to crush any chance of debate. Remember the 10 consecutive post strategy! If you think there is an inequality with respect to the moderation, it has everything to do with you being a troll and nothing to do with my numismatic knowledge. You were a troll on Cointalk and that is how you even ended up here. You were told that you either take your lunacy to PRWE or you would be banned. If we want to talk about truth, maybe we should start with that little nugget. Are we to believe that you transformed from a troll to the benevolent one on this forum. Give us a break! Once a troll, always a troll. I just wasn't aware that trolls cry!
Do you really think that calling you a simple name is worse than me being called an alcoholic or the target of racial insults. These are your words...are they not? Which references (the clown or the alcoholic) were first referenced and by whom? You sling it and then infer that I am the instigator. What you consider being a troll, I considered something else. When did I ever question your numismatic knowledge? I didn't, because...I am aware that your knowledge (of that subject) is far, far superior to mine. See funny thing about the truth is that it's really easy to remember because it's well..the truth. It doesn't require remembering. Fact is...I wasn't trolling at cointalk either, despite your perverted take on it. I had a genuine interest and legitimate questions (I thought), but I got really "turned off" to that atmosphere for what I considered as a very snobbish community. Yeah they banned me. I didn't care at that point. Now this place? It's far from anything honest or non biased so far as I can see. It's entertainment, as was said. People run from the truth. I characterize my points now in a more "lunatic fringe" style because being more reasonable and respectful isn't reciprocated and because it is more effective sometimes than being more civil as well. Honest debate and civility? Almost non existent in here brother. It is what it is. I suppose that's the reason this forum is so small in terms of the number of people who post anything...because it's so whacked out and lopsided to begin with. What reasonable..thinking person would want to post in here with all this lunacy flying back and forth? Opinions here are very carefully shaped and molded, and that's not by accident I don't guess. All whackos in here now which I have become one of. Such is life. I have no problem with truth dude. I think you certainly do, for some strange reason, when it comes to anything having to do with 911. That "debate" became a joke and I realized the forum was what it was, so I discontinued any hope of reasonable debate. Also...money and lies are closely interwoven and usually highly dependent on one another so the truth is usually derailed. Truth becomes whatever is bought and paid for. Extreme wealth and truth, honesty and decency are impossible to blend together. Cash has very little to do with truth and usually much to do with corruption more often than not. That's a fact. I am not wealthy...I can deal with whatever truth comes along pal...have at it.So now...I think...you can't beat em join em in here? Yeah...kinda. Honesty? Look in the mirror dude. These are my opinions and will continue to express them so long as I see fit to do so. It's all just entertainment after all.
First alcoholic reference: POST # 11 First clown reference: POST # 13 And yes, I do believe that it is much worse to call someone you have never met an alcoholic than a clown. The rest of your post was just a bunch of lame excuses and doesn't even deserve a response.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're referring to this particular thread. I am referring to previous threads. You love to fire insult after insult. Don't whine about it now. Lame excuses...I know...don't respond to points you can't defend. Same thing with 911. It's old hat and to be expected from you. Moral of the story? Treat others with the same respect shown to you. Run....run....run...you can't hide. I'm sorry if the truth hurts (well not really).
Tom I take exception at been called dishonest, especialy by you sir, I have bent over backwards to be fair to you but all you have done is throw insults. You got on your high horse with me during the 9/11 debate because I dared to disagree with you and started throwing insults then even though I had never once insulted you now you are at it again I Edit without any form of bias towards any member here. The only person whos posts I woudnt edit would be Peters because HE OWNS the Forum I have even edited my own posts and apologised to members when I have been wrong I have never banned anyone for insulting me and I put up with constant jibes from you and others Well now if you would like me to Tom I will edit out every attack you make on another member every insult you throw at me and I will ban you if you go to far, so to use your own words Treat others with the same respect shown to you Let me make this clear to all I am the referee here as well as a participating memberand I treat one and all the same
Of course I was talking about this thead. And trust me, I am not the one whining. If you notice, the only two people I attack on a regular basis are you and the nitpicker. I might fire a "snipe" at Moen every once in a while but both of us recognize it for what it is and move on shotly thereafter. You have a problem with everybody including the moderator. But in your warped mind, I am the problem. Man up and accept responsibility for your own actions. I am not to blame for your behavior, you are!
I would like to go on record to say that I think you have done an excellent job moderating this zoo over the last year. You could have decided to take the easy way out and ban half of the active members (myself included).
I've seen a few come and go here in my time and can only imagine what some others have seen. One really has to go off the deep end to get banned but I gotta admit it's fun watching them do so.
That's simply not true Steve. Lehigh gets away with murder...maybe because you scrutinize me so closely you overlook his ignorance, you DO NOT treat one and all the same. Man up and admit it at least. You let your buddies slide.
Then it is complicatedly true. And, FWIW, moderating you is an impossible task IMHO. In your short stint on CT, your sole goal seemed to be suicide by moderator. How you have managed to stay here is, IMHO, solely because De Orc has gone out of has way not to remove you.
Jobless claims increased again....foreclosures increased again....bankruptcy filings increased again....taxes will be going up....VAT tax is on the horizon...our debt is increasing by leaps & bounds....so, back to the original question: WHEN WILL THINGS GET BETTER?
....and yet our lib membership refuse to acknowledge the fact that every single economic indicator has gotten worse under BO and continues to worsen.
Sorry. lol I had to do it because I was feeling left out with never having been red penned as far as I can remember.
Instead of asking when things will get better, I should have asked "when thing will stop getting worse"? http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mon...ed-group-blasts-geithners-handling-of-economy
Well it might if both parties quit behaving like little kids and began to work together for the good of your country instead of putting there own egos 1st Dont forget that President Obama can not act alone he has to have support for any bills he wishes to enact yet all we see is stonewalling from both parties