What is Wrong With This O'Donnell Woman?

Does she really believe that she can prevent the teenagers of this country from having sex just because she is a frigid witch? There is something wrong with this chick.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/09/video_of_christine_odonnell_im.html

 

She didn;t used to be a frigid witch. She's like a drunk that gives up drinking or a smoker who gives up cigarettes or a fat person who has gotten skinny. It's not good enough that they gave it up...they want everyone else to give it up too.

 

Once ya go Black(magic)ya dont go back! Even the staunchest republican can see she's a bit out there.

 

She reminds me of Sarah You Betcha. Her clone or close relative I'd say.

 

Why does anyone care, she isn't going to win the election!

 

No...she can't..
Maybe the RNC is prepping her for their VP nomination slot. Now all they need is to nominate the lead criminal nut case.

 

How dumb are you?

The Republicans don't like her, she beat the Republican (Mike Castle) who actually could have won the November election. Dumb ass democrats like you are taking shots at her when you should be kissing her ass. She may actually cost the Republicans control of the Senate in the midterms. Perhaps if you read a news source other than 911truth.com or prisonplanet.com you would know this.

 

Right! Of course Republicans don't like her...

September 15, 2010

National Republicans Embrace O'Donnell

It's a day late, but NSCC Chairman John Cornyn (R-TX) issued a statement backing Christine O'Donnell (R) after her victory in Delaware's Republican U.S. Senate primary last night -- and sends a check for $42,000 as well.

Ben Smith: "It's a remarkable reversal, and a vivid illustration that the base is in charge and has the leadership running scared."

 

Is that your proof? Will you admit you are wrong when the entire party blames her for losing control of the Senate after the elections? Or will you act like a politician and make an excuse.

 

Well...yeah that is my proof! Where is yours? Oh yeah, your opinion.

What does or doesn't happen down the road is really irrelevant to the current argument. I'm sure Republicans will be at each others throats in any case.

 

Wow, the master spin doctor. Do you think $42K is a lot of money? It is meaningless! How much money would Republicans have given Mike Castle if he had won the primary?

What exactly do you want proof about, that others agree with my opinion. Okay! Here is your link!

http://patdollard.com/2010/09/republican-leadership-believes-odonnell-will-cost-them-the-senate/

 

Spininng is when I say that Republicans are embracing O'Donnell and you spin that to say that the Republicans will blame her if they don't get the majority they want. Seems to me that we weren't talking about what might happen in November but rather what the Republicans are doing today i.e. embracing O'Donnell. Just seems to me that if someone is spinning here, it is YOU. Nice try. I just have more on the ball than to fall for the usual Republican tactics you employ so often.

 

I am not sure that is as much an embrace as it is an insincere pat on the shoulder. I don;t think the entire GOP establishment really likes her in the race but they apparently aren't stupid enough to start a civil war over it (like NRSC vs RNC). Although they looked like they certainly were that stupid at first when they said she wouldn't get any support at all from them.

 

So you are saying that the Republicans wanted her to beat Mike Castle in the primary?

They are not embracing her at all. She will be irrelevant in 6 weeks and the appropriate thing to do at this point is to support her for appearances sake. Considering all of the dumb ass posts you make, you really have some balls calling others stupid!

BTW, perhaps you should read Stujoe's comment above, he has the situation summarized correctly.

 

IMO....the whole teabag nonsense is the result of attempts to thin out the vote, making it easy for a smaller percentage of the populous to control the majority. Fracture the vote by establishing the "backup" republican party as a third party....meanwhile...the tea party is simply a subdivision of the right....chop up the numbers of the majority. That's all. Nothing unique or separate there...just money, smoke and mirrors.

 

42K? That's one good poker pot for you, isn't it?

 

OMG. Tom, if the Tea Party candidates and Republicans split the vote that would normally go to the Republican candidate, the beneficiary is the Democratic candidate who will win with a plurality of the vote. Currently, the Tea Party is not an official third party and the Tea Party candidates have to win the Republican primaries in order to get on the ballot. Having both Tea Party and Republicans on the general election ballots would be tantamount to giving the elections to the Democrats.

 

The buyin for my game is $1K. The largest pot I have ever won/lost is $2.5K. Why do you constantly try to portray me as a drunk rich fat cat?

 

In Delaware it doesn't really matter because republicans don't stand a chance there anyway. Delaware is really irrelevant in the large scheme of the corruption. In other states, like Virginia, the strategy is in play...to suck in whatever non hardcore right wingers are left, via the tea party.

 

Perhaps many of the same reasons you try to portray me as a crazy stupid truther?

....and many would think 1K buyin's and playing poker frequently rich behavior. Many would consider the cash you have spent and spend for coins rich behavior. To the person that can't afford those luxuries, it IS rich behavior. (probably because you're rich??).