If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some very harsh things from the bench . . . . -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 "You are either insane or a fool." "I am a sanitary inspector." < _Maske: Thaery_
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> bloviated: >If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that >boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly >touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he >had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his >confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the >prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? > >And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to >contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or >absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and >Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to >his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. > >At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently >don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance >of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of >appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have >gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some >very harsh things from the bench . . . . Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> > bloviated: > >>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that >>boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >>HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly >>touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he >>had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his >>confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the >>prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? >> >>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to >>contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or >>absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and >>Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to >>his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. >> >>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently >>don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance >>of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of >>appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have >>gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some >>very harsh things from the bench . . . . > > Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. Where? -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 You want a job and a lizard to ride? < _The Einstein Intersection_
On Feb 13, 1:58 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in > > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> > > bloviated: > > >>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that > >>boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and > >>HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly > >>touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he > >>had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his > >>confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the > >>prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? > > >>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to > >>contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or > >>absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and > >>Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to > >>his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. > > >>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently > >>don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance > >>of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of > >>appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have > >>gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some > >>very harsh things from the bench . . . . > > > Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. > > Where? > Under the "bridge" that baseball built. America's favorite pastime is still America's favorite pastime. It's just transmogrified from the love of the game to the love of the inane. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
mimus wrote: > If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that > boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and > HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly > touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he > had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his > confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the > prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? > > And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to > contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or > absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and > Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to > his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. > > At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently > don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance > of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of > appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have > gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some > very harsh things from the bench . . . . > Ahem. Cough cough. _Roger_ Clemens. -- nuts
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> got double secret probation for writing: >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> >> bloviated: >> >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that >>>boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >>>HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly >>>touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he >>>had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his >>>confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the >>>prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? >>> >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to >>>contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or >>>absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and >>>Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to >>>his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. >>> >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently >>>don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance >>>of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of >>>appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have >>>gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some >>>very harsh things from the bench . . . . >> >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. > >Where? Roger Clemens Jose Canseco (outfielder) -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
On Feb 13, 3:04 pm, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> > got double secret probation for writing: > > > > >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: > > >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in > >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> > >> bloviated: > > >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that > >>>boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and > >>>HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly > >>>touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he > >>>had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his > >>>confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the > >>>prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? > > >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to > >>>contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or > >>>absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and > >>>Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to > >>>his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. > > >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently > >>>don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance > >>>of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of > >>>appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have > >>>gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some > >>>very harsh things from the bench . . . . > > >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. > > >Where? > > Roger Clemens > Jose Canseco (outfielder) > So do i win a prize for missing all of that, or do i get shunned? -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:53:29 -0500, mixed nuts wrote: > mimus wrote: > >> If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that >> boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >> HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever >> exactly touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating >> how well he had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith >> Clemens did his confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do >> you think the prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think >> and do? >> >> And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to >> contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or >> absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and >> Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her >> to his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the >> Senate. >> >> At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently >> don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an >> appearance of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples >> of appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have >> gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear >> some very harsh things from the bench . . . . >> > Ahem. Cough cough. _Roger_ Clemens. Ah. Sorry. Shows how much I follow the game itself. -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 You want a job and a lizard to ride? < _The Einstein Intersection_
Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote in news:bbd5b1e4-15a2-430e-b4cb-38b063fdb86b@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com: > On Feb 13, 3:04 pm, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >> >> >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus >> >> <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> bloviated: >> >> >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning >> >>>that boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed >> >>>steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around >> >>>without ever exactly touching on the subject of that investigation >> >>>while repeating how well he had always treated that witness, like >> >>>baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >> >>>HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the prosecutors in charge >> >>>of that investigation would think and do? >> >> >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted >> >>>to contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his >> >>>presence or absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose >> >>>Canseco's house, and Clemens instead of just giving them her >> >>>contact information called her to his house and spoke with her >> >>>before passing that information to the Senate. >> >> >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they >> >>>apparently don't have the slightest concern for what is called in >> >>>law "an appearance of impropriety", in this case at least two >> >>>splendid examples of appearances of witness-tampering, which >> >>>goings-on would already have gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the >> >>>street to at the very least hear some very harsh things from the >> >>>bench . . . . >> >> >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. >> >> >Where? >> >> Roger Clemens >> Jose Canseco (outfielder) >> > So do i win a prize for missing all of that, or do i get shunned? i am thinking at least i get the posts about babes playing tennis headkase > > -- > Slipped Moebius > mhm28x9
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:11:29 +0000, psykoexgirlfriend wrote: > Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:bbd5b1e4-15a2-430e-b4cb-38b063fdb86b@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com: > >> On Feb 13, 3:04 pm, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >>> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>> >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in >>> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus >>> >> <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> bloviated: >>> >>> >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning >>> >>>that boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed >>> >>>steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around >>> >>>without ever exactly touching on the subject of that investigation >>> >>>while repeating how well he had always treated that witness, like >>> >>>baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >>> >>>HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the prosecutors in charge >>> >>>of that investigation would think and do? >>> >>> >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted >>> >>>to contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his >>> >>>presence or absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose >>> >>>Canseco's house, and Clemens instead of just giving them her >>> >>>contact information called her to his house and spoke with her >>> >>>before passing that information to the Senate. >>> >>> >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they >>> >>>apparently don't have the slightest concern for what is called in >>> >>>law "an appearance of impropriety", in this case at least two >>> >>>splendid examples of appearances of witness-tampering, which >>> >>>goings-on would already have gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the >>> >>>street to at the very least hear some very harsh things from the >>> >>>bench . . . . >>> >>> >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. >>> >>> >Where? >>> >>> Roger Clemens >>> Jose Canseco (outfielder) >>> >> So do i win a prize for missing all of that, or do i get shunned? > > i am thinking at least i get the posts about babes playing tennis Like I wouldn't post those no matter what. The new pantheon is Sharapova, Hantuchova, Kirilenko and Cirstea. The first two are old faves. As for the two newcomers, the video directors seem almost shy of letting the cameras linger too long on Kirilenko, possibly in fear of angry phone-calls from, er, I think you call 'em "wowsers", while Cirstea shows such great promise I promptly promoted her after seeing a single match to Number Four, Evil Brunette. -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 Take a deep breath, take a walk, cool off, plot a bit, and serve again.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:18:13 -0800 (PST), in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing: >On Feb 13, 3:04 pm, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >> got double secret probation for writing: >> >> >> >> >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in >> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >> >> bloviated: >> >> >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that >> >>>boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >> >>>HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly >> >>>touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he >> >>>had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his >> >>>confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the >> >>>prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? >> >> >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to >> >>>contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or >> >>>absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and >> >>>Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to >> >>>his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. >> >> >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently >> >>>don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance >> >>>of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of >> >>>appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have >> >>>gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some >> >>>very harsh things from the bench . . . . >> >> >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. >> >> >Where? >> >> Roger Clemens >> Jose Canseco (outfielder) >> >So do i win a prize for missing all of that, or do i get shunned? Sent to Tampa Bay Devil Rays Spring Training as the cup cleaner. -- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote in news:3P- dnaNAWvmfCi7anZ2dnUVZ_tajnZ2d@giganews.com: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:11:29 +0000, psykoexgirlfriend wrote: > >> Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:bbd5b1e4-15a2-430e-b4cb- 38b063fdb86b@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com: >> >>> On Feb 13, 3:04 pm, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:58:16 -0500, in the land of >>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >>>> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>> >On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500, in >>>> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus >>>> >> <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> bloviated: >>>> >>>> >>>If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning >>>> >>>that boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed >>>> >>>steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around >>>> >>>without ever exactly touching on the subject of that investigation >>>> >>>while repeating how well he had always treated that witness, like >>>> >>>baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and >>>> >>>HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the prosecutors in charge >>>> >>>of that investigation would think and do? >>>> >>>> >>>And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted >>>> >>>to contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his >>>> >>>presence or absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose >>>> >>>Canseco's house, and Clemens instead of just giving them her >>>> >>>contact information called her to his house and spoke with her >>>> >>>before passing that information to the Senate. >>>> >>>> >>>At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they >>>> >>>apparently don't have the slightest concern for what is called in >>>> >>>law "an appearance of impropriety", in this case at least two >>>> >>>splendid examples of appearances of witness-tampering, which >>>> >>>goings-on would already have gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the >>>> >>>street to at the very least hear some very harsh things from the >>>> >>>bench . . . . >>>> >>>> >> Umm, wow, I hope that was a troll. >>>> >>>> >Where? >>>> >>>> Roger Clemens >>>> Jose Canseco (outfielder) >>>> >>> So do i win a prize for missing all of that, or do i get shunned? >> >> i am thinking at least i get the posts about babes playing tennis > > Like I wouldn't post those no matter what. > > The new pantheon is Sharapova, Hantuchova, Kirilenko and Cirstea. > > The first two are old faves. > > As for the two newcomers, the video directors seem almost shy of letting > the cameras linger too long on Kirilenko, possibly in fear of angry > phone-calls from, er, I think you call 'em "wowsers", while Cirstea shows > such great promise I promptly promoted her after seeing a single match to > Number Four, Evil Brunette. > my hero hk
"mimus" <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:v5GdnSOe95XL-C7anZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@giganews.com... > If a Mob boss had called a witness in an investigation concerning that > boss, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his confessed steroid- and > HGH-injecting trainer, and went all around and around without ever exactly > touching on the subject of that investigation while repeating how well he > had always treated that witness, like baseball star Keith Clemens did his > confessed steroid- and HGH-injecting trainer, what do you think the > prosecutors in charge of that investigation would think and do? > > And now we find that over this very last weekend the Senate wanted to > contact his ex-nanny for testimony from her concerning his presence or > absence at a gettogether at baseball pitcher Jose Canseco's house, and > Clemens instead of just giving them her contact information called her to > his house and spoke with her before passing that information to the Senate. > > At the very least, he needs to fire his lawyers, since they apparently > don't have the slightest concern for what is called in law "an appearance > of impropriety", in this case at least two splendid examples of > appearances of witness-tampering, which goings-on would already have > gotten Joe Blow hoiked right off the street to at the very least hear some > very harsh things from the bench . . . . If ya got money and fame, and can afford very expen$ive lawyers, you can get away with anything. Ref: OJ Simpson. Smee > > -- > tinmimus99@hotmail.com > > smeeter 11 or maybe 12 > > mp 10 > > mhm 29x13 > > "You are either insane or a fool." > "I am a sanitary inspector." > > < _Maske: Thaery_ > >
