With all the preasure from the world governments, I think we will see an accelerated increase in coalition troop pull-outs in Iraq. Do you feel that the Iraqi military/police can take on the insurgents alone and somehow control all the disorder across the entire country? Dou you think the insurgents will consider a troop pull-out a victory and step-up actions to take over the current Iraqi government and gain control of the country?
i say nuke your face. :hammer: i think some of the "freedom fighters" will put down thier arms(guns. not actual arms ) once the red devil has left. but i think the majority of these "freedom fighters" are just opportunistic crim'animals that are fighting just to better themselves.
If the troops pull out then the Iraqi Millitery and Police will revert back to type (They had it all worked out under Sadam) as they will not have us watching & Guiding them in the Humane tratment of suspects & or Terrorists. I believe that there will be a quiet bloodbath until I new strongman emerges might be a cleric or politician I dont know but belive this will happen. De Orc :smile
Thing about countries like Iraq, they will be chaos no matter who is running the show. None of the countries around Iraq want a democracy right next door, so you can bet they are doing all they can to thwart such plans. Even Turkey has interfered in what is going on there, because of the rise in power of the Kurds and the fear that something similar could happen in Turkey. Syria has let it's border be porous for terrorists and arms, so has Iran. About the only nation bordering Iraq not actively infiltrating is Kuwait, and if they could, they would too.
Brilliant point...I look forward to your next statement with great anticipation. NOT! You see Danr, Bush didn't start this war, islamic terrorists started it. It was going on long before you were born. <I am assuming by your well thought out posts that you are between 12 and 18 years old> Go ahead and be anti-Bush, anti-War and anti-whatever. You are just following the left playbook because they don't have a plan to deal with islamic terrorists. If you call "reaching out to them" a plan, well then you are in for a surprise. After all, Russia reached out and was against the Iraqi war and still lost hundreds of children (I'll say again...children) due to the hands of the "religion of peace". Being on the left must be easy. You believe that government is the answer over the indivdual and with that, you can fix the world's problems with more of other people's hard-earned dollars. It' like going to the mall and wanting something you can't pay for...no problem, we'll just let somebody else (the revenue generating rich) pay for it. You really haven't demonstrated ANY commitment to fight and defend this country. Think about it...when was the last "left" president tough on defense? What do you do? You run off to Canada and/or become "anti-this" and "anti-that". When asked what is YOUR plan to deal with our country's enemies, you defer to the United Nations and put their interest ahead of the United States. Bottom line, the left has no backbone to defend this country from an enemy that wishes us death and destruction. Do you fight them there or here? Too bad your choice is quite clear...
Wait a (doggone) minute here. The nutsy right wingers are the ones who trained Osama to blow up buildings!!. Where were you back then!?! if this has been "going on before you were born" why did you not protest training these guys to blow up buildings in the eighties!! Why did you not protest handing Afganistan over to the Taliban. Your post if pretty out there. Further whenever the "fight for your country" phrase is used you know you are being screwed by big gov.
The enemy of my enemy is my freind. Even Churchill stated that he would have slept with the devil if that meant the defeat of Hitler. He was of course was referring to the Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin. Nice try...everything being a conspiracy and all. Still, it is another reflection of the left which is never to take action, but blame everything and be anti-this and anti-that. Gutless...totally gutless.
So it was a good thing to train Osama to blow up buildings? There is no conspiracy about my assertion that we trained Osama, it is an undisputed fact. Are you saying that we did not train these wacko Muslims? I do not understand why you are using the word conspiracy. Further liberals are the ones who have instituted EVERY worth while thing our gov has ever done (Social security, medicare, etc..) All the conservatives have ever done are outlandishly FOOLISH things like invade Iraq!!! Name one good thing the conservatives have EVER done.
Another reason why I am not a Bush fan. No one should take shots at American troops and feel that they can get away with it.
Danr, the more conservative elements were against training and arming the Taliban. I really think that the reason we might lose the war against terrorism and Islam is one we have alot of people on their payroll and two we have to many people who make these things into political issues and will do their best to undermine any effort to fight if the effort is not coming from their "party". I would respect your post if you went the other way and state, why didn't we invade, yes invade, Saudi Arabia and take out Iran since they are supporting with money and arms the majority of the terrorists, never mind the amount of actual Saudi's present at 911.
I must admit that I respect your consistancy. I am convinced that you see the Islam threat as the big threat of our time. If I held that basic belief I would probably arrive at the same conclusions you do. Personally I think these Islamic bozos are just bumblers. The only way they did us any harm is because we taught them how.
Well thank you for not calling me a right wing nut. I see myself more of a realist but I also have on the ground experience with Islam in Allah world. Now about your quote, "they did us harm is because we taught them how" I always thought that helping these nut jobs against the russians was a mistake but how do you explain 911 with all the saudi involvement. The United States military protected them from Iraq and shielded them from Iran. And Bones could answer this but are not our bases isolated from the Saudi's so we really can be out of sight and out of mind if the Saudi's wish. Unless you mean we should never have let them in this nation to begin with under student-visas and the sort which I would agree with you. Would we have let in nazi students to study atomic research before or during world war II? Think about it. They hate us for existing and when they have the strength they turn their hate into actions.
Thank you Andy for a long time now I have been saying that Saudi is not our Friend nice to see that others agree. De Orc Kiss LOL
Saudi Arabia is behind the financing, tacit or otherwise of a myriad of terrorists and so called "liberation" movements all throughout the middle east and in Russia and in Europe. What was it, 14 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were from you guessed it, Saudi Arabia. Osama Bin Laden is from... Saudi Arabia Most of the religious fanaticism originates in... Saudi Arabia.
Andy how much did secret op have to do with promoting that Wusabi(sp) aka nutcake Islam from Saudi. I think they pushed this nutcake form of Islam to help against USSR then it back fired.
Hmm.. i don't think there was such an animal back then, and if there was I don't think we would have, on the other hand.. I would assume that the lions share of the faculty would be former emeriti of the University of Berlin