This Just Isn't The Right Time....

Citizen Kane Humblebrag. Just as useless as the bitter lonely individual in the movie.

The phony Uncle story illustrates Nation is part of the problem...not the solution, and continues to emphasize the ideology of Division, by using a phony Rich Man Poor Man cry in your beer tale.

Nation forgets that this is the fictitious type of person that he constantly rails against in his Ideology of Division, and now turns 180 and presents the fictitious uncle as a Man For All Seasons.

One would think he could at least present a self-made fictitious Uncle built on a Gandhi Role Model, or a Mother Teresa, to support his forgetfulness, instead of an Uncle Scrooge McDuck as a role model.

Nation is jealous of the fictitious cousin, because the fictitious cousin has more things. Nation does not care for People that have things that the Government did not give them. It makes Nation weep.

Clown.

 

Farming is a great example of a business, and anyone that doesn't think farming is a business should really figure out that it is one of this country's original businesses, that is routinely run with a ton of government involvement. I never see anyone complain about the government getting involved with farming. The tax breaks, the subsidies, the direct government payments, all at tax payer expense.

Now I have to ask just to see if we agree, should the government be propping up family farms when the free market could do it more efficiently?

 

I can help. A sole Board Certified Diplomate under 50 years old Practitioner Physician, without employees, that treats all patients regardless of insurance coverage...CMS Medicare/Medicaid, or any credentialed healthcare insurance Provider policy, or any private religious based cost share insurance, or self-pay, or children without insurance that can't pay, and has gross receipts averaging $131,000.00 per year over ten years, and files a 1040 as a self-employed sole Practitioner, not as an S Corp or LLC or Partnership.

Little Joe would define such a person as a moron and a loser and a lousy Doctor, because it does not support his Ideology of Division that all Physicians are Millionaires and that is what is wrong with the healthcare system.

Little Joe is a Clown. He is an offensive Clown.

 

I have a cousin who is a rather large sugar beet (mostly) farmer in Michigan. I've never presumed to know enough to discuss the business so I really don't know the details. He has a large office where he trades commodities when he's not in the fields. I know it takes a few good years to make up for a bad one. It's incredibly capital intensive.

In theory, things would be best if the Free Market worked out supply/demand issues. At the same time, the food supply is a National Security priority and I doubt it's possible to keep government completely out of the mix.

 

The Farmers complain, Clown.
All the time. Constantly. As Farmers should.

I have NEVER heard any person anywhere at any time state that Farming is Not a business. Don't put forth false implications that it is a common assumption, in another baloney sly Ideology of Division attempt by using another tool from your box of disgust.

Try not using stupid examples to support whatever point you are trying to emphasize.

The People pay the price for the Government interference in Farming. Don't show the fallacy of your Ideology of Division, by using a an ignorant concept of inclusion that does not exist.

 

MARXIST

 

Ostensibly you reference someone bankrolling every cent of a large salary, and you’re right . . . That is my perception, based on what I know of those situations, but those kids really are making that kind of money, and are living on their parent’s dime, primarily to save for a juicy down payment or cash purchase of a house of their own. I acknowledge that some money must be spent on meals, transportation, and less than obvious special interests and activities. Is there something else about the subject post do you believe makes it a silly exaggeration?

What about my position (presumably, you’re referencing my desire for a flat tax) do you think exhibits ignorance?

My position is clear enough, and not based upon the positions of others. It is based purely on my sense of fairness. I feel that if an executive makes $300,000 annually and pays $45,000 in tax, the kid making $20,000 should pay $3,000.

I would not characterize my post as either hyperbolic, or in the same vein as the rantings of either JN or FD.

 

I don't. That would be silly exaggeration.

The fact that you double down and use your "perception" as an explanation of equality of language to support a silly exaggeration.

No, I wasn't.

Nice direction change. Your position was not commented on, by me, nor did I describe it as exhibiting ignorance. I described relying on a silly exaggeration by others as proof in support of your silly exaggeration is ignorant and not clear as to reference, at all.

What does some person living in a basement have to do with your position, other than to use the silly exaggeration as a snarky comment to enhance your position of righteousness of a silly exaggeration, which is what I commented on.

You are mimicking the Little Joe tactic now, changing up the subject. It is not necessary.

I don't think that is a silly exaggeration.

 

Maybe I'm a simpleton, but I find your responses difficult to follow. Can you think more about the reader's perspective when replying so your meaning is more clear to those trying to understand?

 

And tag people so they know who you're talking to.

 

Simple. Don't follow. I don't post to assuage your interpretation requirements.

 

Little Joe, I am sure that it is very obvious when I am responding to your stupidity. Whenever you read the words "Ideology of Division" or "Clown", it is about you, and is for the benefit of anyone that cares to read it.
Clown.

 

Statements like this is why Marx was influenced by Voltaire.