The Truth About Palin Comes Out!!!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Toad, Nov 7, 2008.

  1. vess1

    vess1 "Birds of a feather...."


    Ok, maybe I am asking a little much of them to referee this B.S. Maybe Stu could? He's independent enough.

    Separating the facts from opinions isn't going to be hard. Especially if references are listed. I've never seen the Toad list a reference. Be it a senate bill, youtube quote or news article from a major newspaper. Never seen one from him. Must be a reason behind that.
     
  2. Toad

    Toad New Member

    Nope! I've known that for a long time and learned about it by reading U.S. Supreme Court decisions. I've found them to NOT be full of mistruths, like the internet. :rolleyes: Although, I don't agree with all of them.

    So the United States citizens residing in D.C. have no voice in the national government and that qualifies as a definition of tyranny! Imagine that? :rolleyes:

    Ribbit :)
     
  3. Toad

    Toad New Member

    You put so much weight into YouTube, that's pathetic! :D You call that a source? :eek:

    I'll give you sources!

    Ribbit :)

    Ps: Here are my posts with sources (will add as I find them):

    http://www.prweforum.com/showpost.php?p=271875&postcount=10
     
  4. vess1

    vess1 "Birds of a feather...."

    You moron. When it's QUOTES COMING STRAIGHT FROM THE MOUTH OF YOUR MESIAH, YEAH, I CONSIDER THAT A SOURCE. When it's interviews with powerful people and quotes coming straight from their mouth, it's a source. Along with unbias discussion considering various physical aspects, for all to see, concerning Obama's b.c.

    I forgot how much I hate listening to liberal non-sense. Always reliant on supposed "shock value" in a statement that's supposed to cause everyone to automatically believe them, leaving them think they're the default winner of any argument. Hey, it will work on some people!
     
  5. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary


    - 1st Amendment? Fairness Doctrine
    - 2nd Amendment? Gun ownership rights


    Palin is a threat to some people because she is a Christian with true conservative values. The dems & their media downplayed her experience (small business owner, mayor, energy commission chair, governor, commander-in-chief) and blue collar values and instead tried to cast her as a Barbie doll with a funny accent, With the help of SNL and the morons who get their news from the spoof shows, she wasn't taken as seriously as she deserved.
    A far as I know, any reports of her not understanding basic foreign policy questions and free-spending on clothing were merely anonymous reports attributed to McCain staffers...none of the stories were substantiated.
     
  6. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Hey. No one forced her to go on SNL. Then why should she take the defensive on reports that simply arent true. She couldve taken the high road.
     
  7. Toad

    Toad New Member

    Considering Tom Hanks showed his buttocks to L.B.J., digital affects are easy to manipulate so anything on YouTube could have been manipulated digitally. I don't trust YouTube for that reason but it's getting to the point it's hard to find a reliable unbiased source for much of anything. :(

    Ribbit :)
     
  8. clembo

    clembo Well-Known Member

    Tina Fey did a great Palin and Palin DID go on the show. Not for the party but for herself. Anyone with an ounce of brains could see that. The election was over by then.
    Anyway, why should it matter? I remember posting about David Letterman being rather angry when McCain blew him off and thought it might influence people.

    Luckily, Level Headed straightened me out on that. Considering how close you guys were I would surmise the same would apply to SNL or any other show that millions of impressionable people might watch.
    Now that I think about it - where did Level Headed go?

    Glad you think Sarah Palin is such a good Christian David. Have you looked into one of HER mentors very closely? Pastor Muthee?

    Great guy for sure. That is if you're into witch hunting but good ole Sarah just loves him. Good Christian that he is.



    Sure, this clip is biased as hell but just one of many to look at. He did conduct his "witch hunt" in Kenya and I've heard tell he wants to convert Catholics.

    Well, at least he's not racist. He hates ANYONE that disagrees with him and the good Christian Sarah seems to believe him.
     
  9. Toad

    Toad New Member

    I wonder what Vess will say about you using YouTube for your source? :eek:

    Naughty! :D

    Ribbit :cool:
     
  10. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    I get it...you guys respect the non-biased, serious political commentray that is SNL but what about the rest of my post?
    Fairness Doctrine? Gun ownership rights?
    Down playing Palin's real experience? Anybody who isn't impressed by her resume is blinded by bias.
     
  11. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Well I will agree with you that she was the only candidate who has held any form of real executive power, not one of the other candidates as far as I am aware has actualy run a state or country in any capacity other than in the senate which spends most of its time arguing LOL (Same as our Parliment) She was also a mayor which even on a small scale makes her use to weilding power. OK so she might not be super hot on forign policy but hell thats what the advisers are there for LOL
     
  12. Stu Joe

    Stu Joe New Member

    Wsn't Obama head of the Chess club or something in college? I remember somthing like that. ;)
     
  13. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Ike did pretty good without being a mayor.
     
  14. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    Yep but he had experience of running one of the largest moving cities on earth, I think we called it Operation Overlord :D
     
  15. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Ok. Lincoln Wasnt a Governor or Mayor. Neither was Truman, Nixon(as Vice-Pesident), nor LBJ.
     
  16. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    I agree but I dont think that they stood as candidates for this last election LOL
     
  17. craig a

    craig a New Member

    Ha. You've got me there.
     
  18. Toad

    Toad New Member

    Wait a minute, you are concerned with your 2nd Amendment Rights, after Bush trampled all over so many of our other rights? :eek:

    Where were you when he did that? Why weren't you exercising your 2nd Amendment Rights to prevent the degradation of our rights over the last 8 years? Why is it when your Religious Rights and Gun Rights are in jeopardy, do you finally want to do something about it? Is it because the rights that were trampled on, didn't affect you, it only affected those you hate, like Muslims or Gays? What you need to understand is once you go down that path, there is no turning back except to undo it all, so get used to loses rights my friend, you been taking them from others so now it's your turn.


    It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own. THOMAS JEFFERSON


    Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. THOMAS JEFFERSON


    Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. THOMAS JEFFERSON


    If by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might, in a moral point of view, justify revolution. ABRAHAM LINCOLN


    Constitutional rights may not be infringed simply because the majority of the people choose that they be. U.S. SUPREME COURT



    And lastly, I find this fitting:


    I may not agree with what you say, but to the death I will defend your right to say it. VOLTAIRE


    But that doesn't mean you have a right to be an idiot. :rolleyes:

    Ribbit :)
     
  19. David

    David Proud Enemy of Hillary

    ...and you excercise this right quite often.

    So I'm off base by objecting to Obama wanting to infringe on the 1st & 2nd amendments? Is that what I hear you saying?
     
  20. Toad

    Toad New Member

    You hear what you want to hear and see what you want to see, that is the world of a closed minded fool! So please keep proving it to us by opening your mouth (typing). :D

    Since my point was no where near what managed to figure out on your own and spoon feeding it to you won't do any good, I will leave you to your closed minded world and will no longer respond directly to you. I will just refute what you say from now on and act as if you aren't here, since technically, you aren't all there.

    Ribbit :)
     

Share This Page