Do you not feel the cognitive dissonance when in the same post you call for stopping fearmongering you also make reference to hypothetical nuclear apocalypse multiple times? Is it only you that's allowed to fearmonger?
No sir. Not when Putin and Kahmeni have already said it. The lack of strength America has shown the last 3 1/2 years has made the world much more vulnerable. And that is just a demonstrable fact.
I don't know. Putin for sure is in a way weaker position now than Trump ever had him in. Khameni will die soon (as will Biden and Trump). We will see who succeeds him, but they're not exactly in a position of power now either. It was Trump's "leadership" anyway that led to the massive acceleration of their nuclear program, as you may recall.
No, that was BHO's leadership. Much like Obama, Trump warned Iran that, while we do not relish attacking them, we are willing to do so. Unlike Obama, he did not make them flush with billions of Dollars used to fund their conntinued nuclear ambitions.
And yet their progress skyrocketed under Trump after he backed out of us having any checks and balances on their progress... Who could have seen that coming?
OMG. Don't any of you realize the intelligence of the worthless members you are posting with? I'm going to ask a simple question for the benefit of any one afraid to answer direct questions or join this thread: WHAT IS THE POINT OF WATCHING an EDITRDED, SOFTBALL, FAKE NEWS, INTRVIEW? A real Journalist would destroy this "Puppet Front Woman" within the first six questions. The enemies of America cannot afford to have Trump elected because he is not "in the game" to bring this country down. This woman and the powers of the world (that put NO Bama and Biden into the White House) will probably succeed in beating Trump. We are to far down the rat hole to recover (Even if he wins and lives). The nation has turned away from God long ago and all that has been predicted for this earth and our country started decades ago. Right is wrong and down is up. Any informed person know this.
WOW! ALL TRUE. The truffle smell must be strong. Camala is pretty good at "working a crowd too." That's why she was "Installed" to run for POTUS without a single vote. Anyone who is not totally ignorant can see that AFTER THE DEMOCRAT FAKE MEDIA REVEALED HOW WORTHLESS AND BAD SHE ACTUALLY WAS FOR MONTHS , THEY DID A 180 AND NOW REPORT SHE IS TERRIFFIC AND HIDE THEIR OWN PREVIOUS TRUTH'S ABOUT HER!
What a sad, ignorant post. Trump may be the Anti-Christ for all I care. America and the entire world was better off when he was POTUS. IMO, ANY enemy of my country who does not agree with that is blind to the truth of history and thus is unfit to post with those of us who are not.
And unlike Clinton, he did not send them advanced computers (against his advisors) and receive money into his family coffers.
LOL, what an ignorant statement! Under Trump, Iran was on the ropes - virtually broke, they could not sell their oil. Biden's Commie handlers and Jew haters - left over from the Nobama admin, reversed the Trump strangle hold on Iran that allowed the world to blow up! Iran is rolling in cash for the terrorists.
I'm out of here. I've had enough t fun posting with the ignorant today. Remember our fallen citizens this Memorial Day and always who by their death have guaranteed the ignorant to live among us.
In a discussion about leadership I will choose a man that built a skyline over a waffling empty pantsuit while my kids world is burning. One who snubs our greatest ally by vacating her seat in the chambers to curry the “river to the sea” voting base. An electorate that has done nothing to contribute but is well versed at taking from this great nation. Yes, a man that builds skylines is most assuredly a leader in the strictest sense.
Slow today, are we? . . . Their progress skyrocketed because, after so many years of economic sanctions, the Iranians suddenly had real money to spend again. I suppose that, in order to avoid such progress taking place during the Trump administration, Obama could have delayed delivery of funds for a number of years.
That doesn't make any sense. All the progress occured after the massive sanctions came through by Trump. We know this because until Trump backed out of our promises (weakening our ability to do things diplomatically and without violence btw), we had very direct access to watch their progress. Now we only have estimates.
Some timeline information: https://apnews.com/article/timeline-iran-election-nuclear-f3beadc54c44a9ff74989cbf45d9a270 One thing that’s omitted is the Biden’s admins letting them sell oil and Big O’s and ole Yellers gift of billions: https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/10...in-freed-iran-hamas-terror-attack-israel/amp/
Bullcrap. The sanctions existed before Obama was elected. As for “watching” the Iranians, all we could do was watch them clearing evidence of weapons development out of their facilities mere days before inspections because Obama agreed to disallow unannounced inspections. Your understanding of what transpired is shallow and incomplete.
Even if you take that most generous interpretation in favor of Trump, you certainly can't argue Trump was effective in impeding their progress.
That "most generous interpretation in favor of Trump"? Listen, GW, and listen good. That was no interpretation. It was information provided for your benefit, explaining why Trump was justified in pulling out of a bad . . . yes, bad agreement. Obama made an inferior decision, and we are paying for it. Trump did not facilitate the growth of Iran's nuclear weapons capability . . . Obama did. Not only did he ensure the Iranians had time to relocate implicating assets before inspections . . . he also refilled their seriously depleted coffers. Obama practically rebuilt their nuke program for them. Your response was a clever attempt, GW, in that I cannot technically argue that Trump was effective in impeding their progress, but I'm sure as Hell right that he was more effective than the lauded BHO was.