The GOP Bully of the East Coast Has Himself a Scandal.

You know, if it does involve Christie directly, he should pay the political consequences. I have no problem with saying that about any politician, right or left.

However, you're sitting there salivating like a rabid dog hoping for something to happen. Nothing has been shown to tie Christie with this incident. Nothing. Of course, he's the man in charge and is responsible for his subordinates, but will you hold Obama to the same standard? No, of course you won't because you're a squirming little political worm with absolutely no spine or courage.

 

I will hold Obama to the same standard as long as it isn't just another phony scandal. If some low level IRS civil servant does something stupid or some field agents continue an ill-conceived Bush administration operation or the NSA was doing the same things they have been doing for years, I fail to see how those things are the Obama Administration's scandals. Even Benghazi can be linked to the GOP cutting funds to the State Dept far more than anything the Obama Administration did to cause those deaths but again, PROOF. Where is yours that Obama had or his administration committed any kind of crime? All you complain about is a cover up that you can't prove and haven't been able to prove in all this time. You have nothing we have something. That has to just kill you. Obviously!

 

So the Ambassador/National Security Advisor to the UN is a low level position. And Sebelious isn't closely tied to Obama. And Obama did not promise you could keep your insurance/doctor. And Holder did not approve collecting the AP phone records.

Mr. RB, you really need to get you head out of the sand and see the rest of the world.

 

"Sand" is not the word I would have used...

 

1) Susan Rice charged with nothing, convicted of nothing.
2) Kathleen Sebelious charged with nothing, convicted of nothing.
3) Eric Holder charged with nothing, convicted of nothing.
4) Obama charged with nothing, convicted of nothing.

Can you please point out the criminal trial coverage for each of these supposed felons. I'd really love to read about them.

Also, 3 black people out of 4 Mr. race baiter. Coincidence? I don't think so.

Hum? That 0 for 4. I wonder if Christie will come out as well?

 

Rice - proven liar.
Sebelius - proven incompetent manager i.e Obamacare.
Obama - proven liar too numerous to list.
Holder - Proven liar too numerous to list, charged with contempt, admitted racist.
Christie - charged with nothing, convicted of nothing and not only that, even the biased media has yet to find a single thing he has done wrong.

 

You're full of BS. Nobody cares if you personally don't like them, they are guilty of nothing. Now when I make the same accusations of guilt about Christie, suddenly your threshold of proof goes way, way, way up.

The difference, all of these supposed Obama scandals have been investigated ad nauseam with zero proof of any wrong doing although Issa does continue to fish. The Christie scandal isn't a week old yet so guess which one of us is more likely to see a conviction? That right bitch! I'll be Christie.

View attachment 2225

 

Got it. We are off with the insults again. Or if you prefer you term, ad hominem!

 

Insults are not ad hominems. Again, can any of you look up the meaning so the rest of you can use the term correctly? You're just looking stupid again.

 

Definition of AD HOMINEM

1
: appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
2
: marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made

 

How is YOU being a bitch MY prejudice? Bitch!

 

You keep trying to stick words in my mouth. Just where did I say you were prejudice against female dogs? Or for that matter, say you were prejudice anywhere in this thread? On the other hand, virtually every discussion you have here is "marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions mad". If you need a reminder of some of you choice words, I will gladly provide them for you.

 

And I quote....

 

There you go again. Question #1;

You have no evidence thereof.
Question #2;

Nice reference you have there, but it was not from this thread.

yet somehow you cannot read simple English

 

So "I" stuck words in your mouth because you actually said them in a different thread? How does that work? You said them but because they were in a different thread, "I" put them in your mouth? Hum? You have a rather peculiar take on reality.

 

Simple English. Show me where I said either. I dare you!

 

You win....The most ridiculous loser on the forum award.

Why do you feel the need to restrict what you said to just this thread? If you said it, and you clearly did, what difference does the thread make? YOU said I was prejudice. Are you just trying to make another inane, stupid point again? Was your point that you didn't say I was prejudice in "THIS" thread? Wow! No one can argue with that kind of intellect. You go girl. I'm rootin' for you to actually have a meaningful point some day.

 

So now David Wildstein says that he can prove Christie knew about the bridge closing at the time it was shut down contrary to the claim Christie already made. Drip, drip, drip....

 

If Christie authorized or knew about the bridge closure, he should pay the price. In the meantime, however, you've already convicted the man. This reminds me of your reaction to the Trayvon Martin case and we all know how wrong you were about that one! If you believe Christie had prior knowledge of the closure, prove it.

 

That's nonsense. I haven't even accused him of a crime. He is however a liar. The question is, what else has he lied about. Drip, drip, drip. Somehow, I don't think the GOP anointed one is going to be invited to the carnival barker and clown show in Iowa in 2016. Maybe he can watch it on TV from his room in the club Fed he ends up at. Maybe he and Blagojevich can watch it together.