You wrong once again, Moen. Guns do not kill people, bullets do. but no need to worry for mine are sleeping in their metal jackets only to be awaken for extreme measures which would not necessary make me a bad guy but would keep me as a living guy as the bullets make the bad guys go to sleep. "If you know what I mean"...(Neil Diamond)
Not to hard if the eye socket, after the eye is pieced by force of impact, is the point of entry. Didn't you learn anything in life?
You'll have to let me know how that works out for you...Or maybe you could have your next of kin let me know.
De Orc, your version of the Tony Martin story has obviously been taken from the government controlled BBC, which is nothing more than a propoganda outlet, and every knowledgable person has known that for years. As for Moens brain-dead ramblings, if someone pulls a gun on you and demands your money or he kills your kids, would you want to have an Uzi in your hand at that moment in time? Would you use it on him? If the answer to either of these is yes then you have shown yourself to be a hypocrite. If the answer to either of these is no then you have(once again) shown yourself to be a total idiot.
Strange that as they come from FBI source LOL De Orc Ps read what you actualy said LOL De Orc, your version of the Tony Martin story has obviously been taken from the government controlled BBC, which is nothing more than a propoganda outlet, and every knowledgable person has known that for years.
Now that's a brain-dead arguement if I ever heard one. You should actually try pulling your head out of your butt before posting Craigy. You might actually see what it is you are typing and realize, as the rest of do, it's really just a waste of time.
Not even responding to my question as usual. Typical liberal debating technique, but how can you call it that when they never answer your questions.
Answering your question is equivalent to answering the question; How often do you beat your wife. You stated that if I answer “yes”, I'm either an idiot or a hypocrite and since I'm neither I really couldn't answer your question. "Typical liberal debating technique" eh? I guess your question was a typical Right-wing nut job debating technique. Ask a question that has no real response because you want so badly to supply the answer that fits the simple-minded conclusion you’ve already come to in your own head.
Why don't we get this back on topic, hmm? I think the death penalty is a good thing. It deters crime(which in itself is enough for me), it gets these sickos out of taxpayer funded prisons, they can't escape or get out of prison and go do it again. What do you say to this?
How about justice? The victim is not getting justice if the crook gets rehab. Also, I doubt any American wants to pay for some criminal to be rehabilitated. It's their fault they are a criminal, not ours. I've never seen an example of rehab working anyway, have you?
How about summary execution !!! upon re offense ? no second trial, no appeals ,no excuses !!! claim rehabilited ,accept the package !! Rick
I think that with our great strides in technology we may be able to rehabilitate some of these people. It would be very uncomfortable for them though.
Who cares about whether it's uncomfortable or whether they like it??? The issue here should be justice. I don't give a damn if they get rehabilitated, but the victims here should get justice, and that's what a justice system is for. It's too bad bleeding-heart liberals like that Cashman get on the bench. I bet you think he made a good decision, right?
Danr You haven't been around very many criminals have you ?? You know the criminal knows that he is a criminal !! he knows that the second that he is released that the world is full of victims waiting to be preyed upon, and given an opportunity that is exactly what they will do, that is why I made my earlier post, it was Rhetorical in nature since most of the criminals given that option would refuse it, since they know that they will re offend in a short time on the street, thats just the way it is . They look at the masses and know that they have very little risk of being opposed by them ,, because they know that most people will not or cannot defend themselves,they also know that the police are report takers they very seldom are in a position to prevent crime . You know the notion of rehailitation is noble but it has been proven time and again to be a falasy ,,if thirty years behind bars does not change a persons mind there is no amount of reconditioning that will do it . Its time for this country to wake up, with millions of street gang memebrs and at any given time dozens of serial killers and hundreds of child predators active at any given moment people had better get their act together and figure out that protection begins at home !! Rick