so, it wasnt the monitor

so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
going rate.

shes dead, jim.

<sniff>

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

On Jan 26, 2:33 pm, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG> wrote:
> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
> going rate.
>
> shes dead, jim.
>
> <sniff>
>

Time to splurge on a new one!!!! Get something with dual somethings.
And fans.

--
Slipped Moebius
mhm28x9

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
> going rate.
>
> shes dead, jim.
>
> <sniff>

So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Igorth do not "tetht the printhiple". Thtrap it
to the bench and put a good thick bolt of lightning,
that'th our motto.

< _Thief of Time_

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>
>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>> going rate.
>>
>> shes dead, jim.
>>
>> <sniff>
>
>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.

I would guess that the Video DAC has lost a significant bit or the
reference voltage is wonky. Alternative is the output driver.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
got double secret probation for writing:

>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>going rate.
>
>shes dead, jim.
>
><sniff>

Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
wallpaper.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:14:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, in the land of
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>
>>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>> going rate.
>>>
>>> shes dead, jim.
>>>
>>> <sniff>
>>
>>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.
>
> I would guess that the Video DAC has lost a significant bit or the
> reference voltage is wonky. Alternative is the output driver.

He's a chip-head, he should be able to work it out.

Although there's always the $vP ratio ($ v. PITA) to look at first.

(I just made that up. I like it.)

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

You want a job and a lizard to ride?

< _The Einstein Intersection_

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:26 -0500, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:14:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>>> going rate.
>>>>
>>>> shes dead, jim.
>>>>
>>>> <sniff>
>>>
>>>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.
>>
>> I would guess that the Video DAC has lost a significant bit or the
>> reference voltage is wonky. Alternative is the output driver.
>
>He's a chip-head, he should be able to work it out.
>
>Although there's always the $vP ratio ($ v. PITA) to look at first.
>
>(I just made that up. I like it.)

He might even have spares...

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>
>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>> going rate.
>>
>> shes dead, jim.
>>
>> <sniff>
>
>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.

it went light & washed out, and pastel/flourescent

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:14:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, in the land of
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>
>>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>> going rate.
>>>
>>> shes dead, jim.
>>>
>>> <sniff>
>>
>>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.
>
>I would guess that the Video DAC has lost a significant bit or the
>reference voltage is wonky. Alternative is the output driver.

thankfully, someone was nice enough to set me up with a replacement.
an ATI radeon all in wonder everything card.

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>going rate.
>>
>>shes dead, jim.
>>
>><sniff>
>
>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
>wallpaper.

mheh

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:26 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:14:14 -0800, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:04:34 -0500, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>>> card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>>> Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>>> for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>>> going rate.
>>>>
>>>> shes dead, jim.
>>>>
>>>> <sniff>
>>>
>>>So wot's wrong with the card? let's have a little board-analysis here.
>>
>> I would guess that the Video DAC has lost a significant bit or the
>> reference voltage is wonky. Alternative is the output driver.
>
>He's a chip-head, he should be able to work it out.
>
>Although there's always the $vP ratio ($ v. PITA) to look at first.
>
>(I just made that up. I like it.)

it is almost never a winning choice to electronically debug & fix a
video card versus just buying a new one.

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

> shes dead, jim



--
I bring the chain
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
narcs, chain breakers are not LAW
neither are jocks or dainties
in fact narcs are at many odds with law
repeat, I am not talking about giving narcs much

let 1%(not narcs) eat what they narc on, unless they are femme,
then give them as much string as they want, the land of corn is purse-i-
on, Persian, the chains can take care of purse string problems,
much more fun to do it the hardest way

give narcs the length of string yu can afford
and the dainties then jocks will fall

rises should happen before raises

?-The Devil
?kid? - Dale
prospect? - Dale Kelly
healer? - Dale Richard Kelly
soothsayer? - Dale Kelly
seer? - Mr. Kelly
magi? - Don Dale Kelly
gaul(one) - Dale Kelly
celt (oNe) - O'Cellaigh
druID (oNe) - THE DRUID
druId (oNe) - Dale
tripper (OnE) - Dale Kelly
trip dealer (OnE) - Satan
tripper wheeler (OnE) - Dale
wheeler (OnE) - The Rider
billy' GOAT (One)- Beelzubub
hilly' GOAT (One) - Leader Pagan's MC
SEEKER (ONE) - Baphomet (Captain) Pagans MC
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me

http://sheilafeistyshy.blogspot.com/
http://barphomet.blog.com/


I have the RELIANCE

--
I bring the chain
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
narcs, chain breakers are not LAW
neither are jocks or dainties
in fact narcs are at many odds with law
repeat, I am not talking about giving narcs much

let 1%(not narcs) eat what they narc on, unless they are femme,
then give them as much string as they want, the land of corn is purse-i-
on, Persian, the chains can take care of purse string problems,
much more fun to do it the hardest way

give narcs the length of string yu can afford
and the dainties then jocks will fall

rises should happen before raises

?-The Devil
?kid? - Dale
prospect? - Dale Kelly
healer? - Dale Richard Kelly
soothsayer? - Dale Kelly
seer? - Mr. Kelly
magi? - Don Dale Kelly
gaul(one) - Dale Kelly
celt (oNe) - O'Cellaigh
druID (oNe) - THE DRUID
druId (oNe) - Dale
tripper (OnE) - Dale Kelly
trip dealer (OnE) - Satan
tripper wheeler (OnE) - Dale
wheeler (OnE) - The Rider
billy' GOAT (One)- Beelzubub
hilly' GOAT (One) - Leader Pagan's MC
SEEKER (ONE) - Baphomet (Captain) Pagans MC
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me

http://sheilafeistyshy.blogspot.com/
http://barphomet.blog.com/

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio wrote:

> Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
> wallpaper.


is this compatible with Ubuntu linux (gutsy) Thanks



--
I bring the chain
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
narcs, chain breakers are not LAW
neither are jocks or dainties
in fact narcs are at many odds with law
repeat, I am not talking about giving narcs much

let 1%(not narcs) eat what they narc on, unless they are femme,
then give them as much string as they want, the land of corn is purse-i-
on, Persian, the chains can take care of purse string problems,
much more fun to do it the hardest way

give narcs the length of string yu can afford
and the dainties then jocks will fall

rises should happen before raises

?-The Devil
?kid? - Dale
prospect? - Dale Kelly
healer? - Dale Richard Kelly
soothsayer? - Dale Kelly
seer? - Mr. Kelly
magi? - Don Dale Kelly
gaul(one) - Dale Kelly
celt (oNe) - O'Cellaigh
druID (oNe) - THE DRUID
druId (oNe) - Dale
tripper (OnE) - Dale Kelly
trip dealer (OnE) - Satan
tripper wheeler (OnE) - Dale
wheeler (OnE) - The Rider
billy' GOAT (One)- Beelzubub
hilly' GOAT (One) - Leader Pagan's MC
SEEKER (ONE) - Baphomet (Captain) Pagans MC
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me
1% - give to law what law gives to me

http://sheilafeistyshy.blogspot.com/
http://barphomet.blog.com/

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>>card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>>Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>>for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>>going rate.
>>>
>>>shes dead, jim.
>>>
>>><sniff>
>>
>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
>>wallpaper.
>
>mheh

You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
are floating on Oprah.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>>>card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>>>Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>>>for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>>>going rate.
>>>>
>>>>shes dead, jim.
>>>>
>>>><sniff>
>>>
>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
>>>wallpaper.
>>
>>mheh
>
>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
>are floating on Oprah.

i know. its evul.

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

<This space for rent.>

 

Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( )
NO:

>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the graphics
>>>>>card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256 Creative 3D
>>>>>Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i lived in canada.
>>>>>for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at the time. about the
>>>>>going rate.
>>>>>
>>>>>shes dead, jim.
>>>>>
>>>>><sniff>
>>>>
>>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as the
>>>>wallpaper.
>>>
>>>mheh
>>
>>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
>>are floating on Oprah.
>
>i know. its evul.

All I have to do is reply.
--
Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately.

*****************************************
* *
* Wavy G *
* mail me at: *
* godsspeciallamb@gmail.com *
* *
* *
*****************************************

 

Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> wrote in
news:fa4op313lrti1e1deuj2j3m90dges45vh7@4ax.com:

> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES (
> ) NO:
>
>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>
>>>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the
>>>>>>graphics card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256
>>>>>>Creative 3D Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i
>>>>>>lived in canada. for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at
>>>>>>the time. about the going rate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>shes dead, jim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><sniff>
>>>>>
>>>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as
>>>>>the wallpaper.
>>>>
>>>>mheh
>>>
>>>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
>>>are floating on Oprah.
>>
>>i know. its evul.
>
> All I have to do is reply.

all i have to do is hail something something..

 

Dear, "psykoexgirlfriend": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES (
) NO:

>Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> wrote in
>news:fa4op313lrti1e1deuj2j3m90dges45vh7@4ax.com:
>
>> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES (
>> ) NO:
>>
>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>>>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the
>>>>>>>graphics card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256
>>>>>>>Creative 3D Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i
>>>>>>>lived in canada. for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at
>>>>>>>the time. about the going rate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>shes dead, jim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><sniff>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as
>>>>>>the wallpaper.
>>>>>
>>>>>mheh
>>>>
>>>>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
>>>>are floating on Oprah.
>>>
>>>i know. its evul.
>>
>> All I have to do is reply.
>
>all i have to do is hail something something..

My choice for a career would be Pharmacist. I would like to have the
job of Pharmacist because a Pharmacist is not only a provider of
services to the Community, he is also a beloved Member. If I were a
Pharmacist, I would fill people's prescriptions, also plus I would check
to see if there would be any medicines they shouldn't take because of
cross-reactions.

If I had the job of Pharmacist, I would make the effort to get to know
all of my customers and learn details about their personal lives so we
could make small talk, not counting the ones that only come in once or
twice of course! Also plus too, I could develop little running jokes
with some of them and build on them every time they came in. Like say
for instance there was a guy who was a little overweight, but was a good
sport about it, I would call him "Slim," and every time I saw him, I
would say, "Hey Slim, we need to put some meat on your bones! For
Pete's sake, eat something!" And he would say, "Wavy G, you old
so-and-so, who has time to eat? Gimme a refill of that Slow-K, also one
of the Procardin. How's business?" Then I would say, "Fine, did you
ever get that driveway patched?" And we'd probably go back and forth
like that for a little while. Then when there wasn't anthing else
really to say, he would pay me using Cash or Credit Card, or another
approved method of payment.

DID YOU KNOW: A pharmacist is a man or woman who prepares, stores,
compounds, and dispenses medicine! To be a Pharmacist I would have to
attend College.

In conclusion, my choice for a career is Pharmacist.

Wavy G.
--
Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately.

*****************************************
* *
* Wavy G *
* mail me at: *
* godsspeciallamb@gmail.com *
* *
* *
*****************************************

 

On Jan 27, 4:05 am, psykoexgirlfriend <psykoexgirlfri...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Wavy G <godsspeciall...@gmail.com> wrote innews:fa4op313lrti1e1deuj2j3m90dges45vh7@4ax.com:
>
>
>
> > Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES (
> > ) NO:
>
> >>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com>
> >>wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
> >>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG>
> >>>got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio
> >>>><a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
> >>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG>
> >>>>>got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >>>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the
> >>>>>>graphics card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce 256
> >>>>>>Creative 3D Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it while i
> >>>>>>lived in canada. for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe $400 US at
> >>>>>>the time. about the going rate.
>
> >>>>>>shes dead, jim.
>
> >>>>>><sniff>
>
> >>>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop as
> >>>>>the wallpaper.
>
> >>>>mheh
>
> >>>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your ICONs
> >>>are floating on Oprah.
>
> >>i know. its evul.
>
> > All I have to do is reply.
>
> all i have to do is hail something something..

hail yeah.

--
Slipped Moebius
mhm28x9

 

Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:d1fc0e17-dd43-4b3d-983a-db4c6b2aa23f@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 27, 4:05 am, psykoexgirlfriend <psykoexgirlfri...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Wavy G <godsspeciall...@gmail.com> wrote
>> innews:fa4op313lrti1e1deuj2j3m90dges45vh7@4ax.com:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES
>> > ( ) NO:
>>
>> >>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:32:15 -0800, Aratzio
>> >><a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:16:16 -0500, in the land of
>> >>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom
>> >>><D...@MeOw.OrG> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>> >>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:16 -0800, Aratzio
>> >>>><a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:33:12 -0500, in the land of
>> >>>>>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, dave hillstrom
>> >>>>><D...@MeOw.OrG> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>> >>>>>>so, it wasnt the monitor. the monitor is fine. it was the
>> >>>>>>graphics card. my venerable old Creative Labs CT6970 GeForce
>> >>>>>>256 Creative 3D Blaster Annihilator, circa 2000. i bought it
>> >>>>>>while i lived in canada. for, i believe, $500+ canadian. maybe
>> >>>>>>$400 US at the time. about the going rate.
>>
>> >>>>>>shes dead, jim.
>>
>> >>>>>><sniff>
>>
>> >>>>>Must be time for an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER and the TV on the desktop
>> >>>>>as the wallpaper.
>>
>> >>>>mheh
>>
>> >>>You do know you can do that? The TV is the wallpaper and your
>> >>>ICONs are floating on Oprah.
>>
>> >>i know. its evul.
>>
>> > All I have to do is reply.
>>
>> all i have to do is hail something something..
>
> hail yeah.
>

hail?
the sky is falling the sky is falling