Since 911 keeps popping up in other threads...

Just more of your stupid lies. I have told you already, I don't watch FOX news

You two dont listen do you

 

political abuse of the mental health. Serious stuff, you do not want to even joke about that one.
http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/1/136.pdf

It is very dangerous to say that someone is mentally ill because they disagree with you politically (bad path to go down).

 

Wow, I am scared. It was a joke, everyone knows it, and it had nothing to do with his political views. It was in response to his lies about me representing FOX News. Pay attention would you!

 

De Orc...you edit me. You gonna enforce the same standard or can I take this as an approval of calling out insults? I can repost the comments you edited to show the inconsistencies in the selective judgment you render if calling people clowns is acceptable, if you would like.

 

Your lies are just as insulting.

 

I'm told as soon as you promise to double your medication, stop impersonating a government shill and turn yourself in.....my privileges will be curtailed.

 

Even scarier are the hugely ignorant who are completely oblivious that they reflect the "Fox" paradigm.

 

No rebuttal attempts. What a surprise. How unusual.

 

LAST WARNING GUY's

 

I got no problem doing without the insults. I do fire back when fired upon.
It'd be great to have a debate about facts without resorting to name calling when the answer bag is empty.

 

Air Force pilot attests to 93 and 77 "hijacks"

Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force
Former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).

"I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don't believe it's possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding -- pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G's. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it."

The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple." … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall without touching the lawn."…

"For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible - there is not one chance in a thousand," said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727's to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737's through 767's it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.

 

Atta part of "Able Danger"..OMG....FROM FOX!!!

Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, U.S. Navy – Former head of the Able Danger data mining program that targeted Al Qaeda’s global structure. Former Commanding Officer of the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf. Former Commanding Officer of the frigate USS Estocin. Former Commanding Officer of the coastal patrol ship USS Typhoon. U.S. Naval Academy graduate. Awards include the Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, three Meritorious Service Medals, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, two Navy Commendation Medals, and the Navy Achievement Medal. 23 years of Navy service.

Fox News Article 8/23/05: "I will not discuss this outside of my chain of command. I have briefed the Department of the Army, the Special Operations Command and the office of (Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence) Dr. Cambone as well as the 9/11 Commission. My story has remained consistent. Atta was identified by Able Danger in January/February 2000." http://www.foxnews.com

 

Another lie. You ignore everything that makes any sense and just continue to post and post and post and post and post and post and post your propaganda. You are not interested in having a debate at all. Furthermore, made up crap is not facts. In order to call something a fact, you have to have proof.

 

Speaking of ignoring...check the previous 3 posts prior to yours. I would submit that it is you who choose not to debate what you are not comfortable with.
Perhaps the disconnect with you is your interpretation of "proof". I call proof
information made available to me that I can verify through multiple sources that are credible. Strangely enough, the internet provides more than ample resources to many different sources of information, which one can check and re-check. Now watch. Here's a simple example of your hypocricy and your "non-interest" in a debate. The folks I reference in my last three posts in this thread, list 3 seperate credentialed individuals, whom you have chosen to ignore/not respond to, other than to make a sweeping general comment of "lies". In my view, a debate is going back and forth on a particular point, then either agreeing to disagree, or, God forbid, agree. You choose not to do that. You choose to insult, badger, or otherwise demean whatever is posted, either through personal attacks, non responses, or simple one maybe two word responses that are very "non-specific" to the reference being posted.
The reason, in my view, is because you DON'T have a credible response, so you just insult and try to engage me in the same rhetoric (successfully avoiding the point raised). That is how you operate. I think it's very apparent to anyone viewing. If one looks back to the beginning of these threads, it's also very easy to ascertain where the hostility originates. Again, I have no problem engaging in a debate. However, it takes more than one side to be engaged in the actual debate. You choose hostility rather than intelligent debate and then claim it is I who is a fraud, liar, clown, mental patient, etc,etc,etc, and then ridicule and insult some more., meanwhile responding to nothing. To use your words.,"dodgeball". Have a spectactular day.

 

I tried to debate you for over 40 pages on the other thread, you refused and just kept posting your propaganda ignoring everything I posted. You decided not to debate so I have no choice but to simply be a thorn in your side at this point. I don't dodge anything and what is apparent to everyone is your lack of character and obvious spin tactics. Your idea of a credible source is anything quoted from a truther website. Your are a truther drone, nothing more. You accuse everyone else of not being able to think yet only have the capacity to regurgitate the lunatic ravings of the truther movement leaders. It wouldn't surprise me if they pay you.

Will I continue to you call you what you are, a lunatic truther clown, YES. Are you going to do anything about it other than cry like a little baby to the mod, NO. BTW, do you really think that anyone is going to fall for your little, "I want to debate but" routine. You are as transparent as glass. Your whole post is nothing more than an attempt to discredit me by accusing me of what you have done since your very first post on this forum, play dodgeball.

BTW, how do you do that with them big shoes on?

 

Hmm...no specific responses once again. No editing on the clown references. I guess it's open season on insults. Where did I put my insult book....oh yeah..here it is.."How to point out hypocricy when conversing with a dodgeball".

 

No dispute then of the Navy and Air Force captains. "crap", "propaganda"..
That's your rebuttal.
Sad but funny how we're supposed to take the word of a self proclaimed educated person who has no proof of anything except his own ignorance and we're supposed to discount statements from high ranking military officials over Mr. LeeLie because of his "opinion" as to the source of the officer's statements, like that somehow erases their statements.

 

You decided not to debate so I have no choice but to simply be a thorn in your side at this point. I don't dodge anything
-HeLie-
===============================

I'd say more a dying,wingless gnat rather than a thorn. Dodgeball does seem to be your strong point however.

 

Believe your eyes

Would you look at that? Perfect nose cone shot at ground level. Look at all that evidence! The Pentagon must have sucked the plane very neatly inside.

 

It doesn't surprise me that you don't know how to read. The debate went on for over 40 pages in another thread and you didn't read a single thing I wrote. Now you accuse me of not wanting to have a debate. Don't you have kids party to attend.

BTW. What is wrong with you. Losing your steam. You only posted 4 consecutive times.