the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, really. especially while altered. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
On Feb 1, 6:06 pm, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG> wrote: > the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, > really. especially while altered. > > -- > dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj > > <This space for rent.> I'm inclined to make jokes about going "nipples first into a new frontier" but I don't think they'll lead anywhere. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote: >the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >really. especially while altered. ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own figure the only possible redeaming quality. ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down scenes appeal to me. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:15:33 -0800 (PST), Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Feb 1, 6:06 pm, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG> wrote: >> the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >> really. especially while altered. >> >> -- >> dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj >> >> <This space for rent.> > >I'm inclined to make jokes about going "nipples first into a new >frontier" but I don't think they'll lead anywhere. oh, wait, i think it may only be the end of the beginning and not the beginning of the end of the movie. positive or negative points for length and sheer incomprehensibility on tnt tonight. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> > wrote: > >>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>really. especially while altered. > > ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, > but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own > figure the only possible redeaming quality. > > ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining > of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! > > thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and > probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down > scenes appeal to me. So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least watchable? (I've seen neither.) -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 Nobody murders my drinking buddies but me. < Laumer
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >> wrote: >> >>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>really. especially while altered. >> >> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >> >> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >> >> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >> scenes appeal to me. > >So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >watchable? (I've seen neither.) the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>>really. especially while altered. >>> >>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>> >>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>> >>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >>> scenes appeal to me. >> >>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >>watchable? (I've seen neither.) > >the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even get naked. Sheesh. -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) > NO: > >>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>>>really. especially while altered. >>>> >>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>>> >>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>>> >>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >>>> scenes appeal to me. >>> >>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) >> >>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. > > Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even > get naked. Sheesh. That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. And now, she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:01:17 -0500, Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> wrote: >Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >NO: > >>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>>>really. especially while altered. >>>> >>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>>> >>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>>> >>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >>>> scenes appeal to me. >>> >>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) >> >>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. > >Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even >get naked. Sheesh. she was pretty ~close~ to naked. and you never know what those whackos cut out so they can air it without getting sued by miss manners, et al. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >Wavy G wrote: > >> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >> NO: >> >>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>>>>really. especially while altered. >>>>> >>>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >>>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >>>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>>>> >>>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >>>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>>>> >>>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >>>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >>>>> scenes appeal to me. >>>> >>>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >>>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) >>> >>>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. >> >> Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even >> get naked. Sheesh. > >That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. And now, >she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. 2/2/08: "The Day Tim Weaver Agreed with Me." I'll start chilling the champagne. -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >>Wavy G wrote: >> >>> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >>> NO: >>> >>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >>>>>>>really. especially while altered. >>>>>> >>>>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >>>>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras own >>>>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>>>>> >>>>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >>>>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>>>>> >>>>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >>>>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat down >>>>>> scenes appeal to me. >>>>> >>>>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >>>>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) >>>> >>>>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. >>> >>> Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even >>> get naked. Sheesh. >> >>That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. And now, >>she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. > > 2/2/08: "The Day Tim Weaver Agreed with Me." > > I'll start chilling the champagne. I'll bring some beer, too. -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
On Feb 2, 2:56 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wavy G wrote: > > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: > >>Wavy G wrote: > > >>> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) > >>> NO: > > >>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: > > >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG> > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, > >>>>>>>really. especially while altered. > > >>>>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, > >>>>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras > own > >>>>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. > > >>>>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining > >>>>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! > > >>>>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and > >>>>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat > down > >>>>>> scenes appeal to me. > > >>>>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least > >>>>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) > > >>>>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. > > >>> Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even > >>> get naked. Sheesh. > > >>That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. And now, > >>she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. > > > 2/2/08: "The Day Tim Weaver Agreed with Me." > > > I'll start chilling the champagne. > > I'll bring some beer, too. Hell, I'm in. I'll bring the cards. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
Dear, "Slipped Moebius": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >On Feb 2, 2:56 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Wavy G wrote: >> > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >> >>Wavy G wrote: >> >> >>> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >> >>> NO: >> >> >>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <D...@MeOw.OrG> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >> >>>>>>>really. especially while altered. >> >> >>>>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie suck, >> >>>>>> but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, with laras >> own >> >>>>>> figure the only possible redeaming quality. >> >> >>>>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the beggining >> >>>>>> of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >> >> >>>>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. and >> >>>>>> probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a few beat >> down >> >>>>>> scenes appeal to me. >> >> >>>>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at least >> >>>>>watchable? (I've seen neither.) >> >> >>>>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. >> >> >>> Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't even >> >>> get naked. Sheesh. >> >> >>That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. And now, >> >>she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. >> >> > 2/2/08: "The Day Tim Weaver Agreed with Me." >> >> > I'll start chilling the champagne. >> >> I'll bring some beer, too. > >Hell, I'm in. I'll bring the cards. Are there going to be any girls this time? -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
dave hillstrom wrote: > the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, > really. especially while altered. Wait! WHAT? They maid a second one? UGH! -- Per - user23ATgmailDOTcom mhm 24x23 icq: 6047688
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "Slipped Moebius": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( > ) NO: > >>On Feb 2, 2:56 pm, Tim Weaver <tmw99...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Wavy G wrote: >>> > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >>> > NO: >>> >>Wavy G wrote: >>> >>> >>> Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) >>> >>> YES ( ) NO: >>> >>> >>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:36:04 -0500, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> >>> >>>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:06:22 -0500, dave hillstrom >>> >>>>>> <D...@MeOw.OrG> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>>the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i >>> >>>>>>>mean, really. especially while altered. >>> >>> >>>>>> ok, not only does the beginning of this second lara croft movie >>> >>>>>> suck, but its middle and late middle sucketh royally as well, >>> >>>>>> with laras own figure the only possible redeaming quality. >>> >>> >>>>>> ok, ok. so, now, officially, the end of the middle and the >>> >>>>>> beggining of the end of the movie sucked royally as well!! >>> >>> >>>>>> thats like, really, um, im watching a whole, terrible movie. >>> >>>>>> and probably JUST because of lara crofts imaginary ass and a >>> >>>>>> few beat down scenes appeal to me. >>> >>> >>>>>So you're implying the first "Lara Croft" movie was good or at >>> >>>>>least watchable? (I've seen neither.) >>> >>> >>>>the first one was watchable beyond just her figure, yes. >>> >>> >>> Yeah, like I wanna watch an Angelina Jolie movie where she doesn't >>> >>> even get naked. Sheesh. >>> >>> >>That's all she's good for. All non-naked movies she did sucked. >>> >>And now, she's gotten so weird I'm not even interested anymore. >>> >>> > 2/2/08: "The Day Tim Weaver Agreed with Me." >>> >>> > I'll start chilling the champagne. >>> >>> I'll bring some beer, too. >> >>Hell, I'm in. I'll bring the cards. > > Are there going to be any girls this time? Yes. They will be the naked servers. -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:36:53 -0600, Per <bork@bork.bork> wrote: >dave hillstrom wrote: >> the beginning of lara croft second movie really sucked. i mean, >> really. especially while altered. > >Wait! WHAT? They maid a second one? UGH! yes. they did. and while the first one had some redeeming qualities besides angelina jolies figure, the second one did not. i, of course, being a red blooded american male, whatched both the first and second ones three times each as TNT played em for all they were worth. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
