Senate Repubs lockstep with Bush out of step with America

"True" muslims animals have been around in great numbers well before this country was attacked by these animals along the North African coast where President Thomas Jefferson had to dispatch our newly formed Marines to kill these animals...and guess what my appeasing liberal friend? They will be around until they are killed off.

You see...just like cancer is a scourge on the body, "true" islamic terrorism is a scourge on civilization. But unlike how we aggressively treat cancer, you and your fellow appeasers allow (yes, you "allow") isalmic terrorism to frolic unchecked, whether it is here in hidden cell form in the U.S., or in the form of radical islamic threats in the Middle East. In order that we not incur excessive civilian casualties in removing the islamic terrorists among them with military force, you would rather stand down and do nothing.

Wait...you call it "redeploy"

Cancer and islamic terrorism are analogous pathogenic conditions in many ways. And we treat them nearly identically with the exception of one extreme measure: with cancer, if a part of the body does not respond to all other aggressive treatments, all oncologists universally agree that it is far better to sacrifice a limb or other part of the body to save the whole, if in doing so the underlying cancer is removed. With islamic terrorism, we (to include not only the United States, but Israel among others) balk at taking out the "true" muslim with extreme prejudice if they are anywhere near a populated area.

And this is where we are going to lose in the long run. Against islamic terrorism, that is, not cancer.

Just a "handful", get real!

 

Well, Midas, it probably comforts you that you'll have work for many years to come and with all of the help you are giving them, they may make you an honorary Muslim. You lucky dog!

 

I recognize the islamic cancer...you dismiss it as simply a "handful" and try to impress us with your smiley collections. Nice.

 

Is it any different than you posting staged picture after staged picture to help them promote their cause. Or using bolded text or colored text to make your hate speech seem more important than just plain old everyday hate speech. And what about all of your labels? Animals, cancer, appeasers, Liberals, apologists? Label are used by people that don't have any idea what they are talking about. But they do appeal to emotions and that is all you have is a bad emotional appeal to make your point. How sad it must be to be you. You must feel attacked a lot in your personal life to continue this endless crusade. No one is out to get you, you are safe. Now just try and relax a bit.

 

Staged pictures? Oh please...are you going to tell us that all of those islamic terrorist attacks committed by these animals are staged too?

BTW...the analogy and comparisons of Nazis's and cancer to islam is VERY fitting...and as for labels, if you have better descriptions for "true" muslims, lets hear them.

If you have better descriptions for people that apologize for and appease "true" muslims, let's hear that too!

But go ahead and avoid the subject and do what most liberals do when they can't debate with logic, rational, historical facts, and reference...just continue to attack me personally.

 

Any different than President of USA making up lies about WMD's in Iraq?:yawn:

 

You forgot Nazis's...you can't simply ignore the similarities between islam and nazism:

Mein Kampf- States that Germans are the superior race of mankind and that Germany is destined to rule the world , and dominate all other races and nations.


The Q'uran-States that Islam and Muslims are the superiors of mankind and that Islam is divinely mandated to rule the world and dominate all other races, creeds and nations.

Mein Kampf-Says that the German State is to have control over every aspect of life. Says all individuals must submit to the State.

The Q'uran-Says that Islam and Sharia is to have control over every aspect of life. Says all individuals must submit to Islam.

Mein Kampf-Says that Germans have the duty to claim their divinely appointed place in the world by whatever means necessary. Puts loyalty to the Volk (the race) above all other ethical considerations.

The Q'uran-Says that Muslims have a duty to wage Jihad and to advance Islam's domination over the world (Dar Islam and Dar Harb) by any means necessary. Places loyalty to fellow Muslims (Umma) and Islam above all other ethical considerations.

Mein Kampf-Mandates that men are superior to women and that women's place should be limited to procreation, the kitchen and the home.

The Q'uran-Mandates that men are superior to women and that women's place should be limited to procreation, the kitchen and the home. (Admittedly, the Q'uran goes quite a bit farther than Mein Kampf on this topic)

Mein Kampf-Says that homosexuals are 'race traitors' and should be condemned to death. (Many, in fact were murdered in the concentration camps).

The Q'uran-Says homosexuals are unholy to Allah and should be condemned to death

Mein Kampf-Sets out a detailed model for world conquest, including rules for how conquered peoples are to be suppressed and dominated by the German race. States that the wealth, resources and property of subject peoples belongs to Germans by right and the right to life for subject peoples is dependent on Germans. States that non-Germans have no legal or civil rights.

The Q'uran-Sets out a detailed model for world conquest, including rules for how conquered peoples are to be suppressed and dominated by Muslims. States that the wealth, resources and property of subject peoples belongs to Muslims by right and the right to life for subject peoples is dependent on Muslims. States that non-Muslims have no legal or civil rights. (in truth, a lot of this has its basis in the Hadith and the Sunna, but both derive essentially from what's in the Q'uran, along with all the other aspects of Sharia).

Mein Kampf-Divides the world into 'German land' and enemy territory. States that land with Germans living in it or land that once had Germans ruling it rightfully belongs to Germany, and Germany is entitled to get it back by any means necessary.

The Q'uran-Divides the world into 'Dar al Islam' (Muslim ruled land) and enemy territory (Dar al Harb). States that land with Muslims living in it or land that once had Muslims ruling it rightfully belongs to Dar al Islam, and Muslims are entitled to get it back by any means necessary.

Mein Kampf-Blames the Jews for society's ills and says that they will be exterminated.

The Q'uran-Blames the Jews for society's ills and says that they will be exterminated. ("On the day of Judgement the rocks and trees will call out 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me! Come and slay him!")



​

Islam and Nazism. Mohammed and Hitler. As plain as day, they are cut from the same cloth.

Don't you ever wonder why Mein Kampf is still and currently a best seller in islamic dominated countries??

I find the labels accurate!

 

Midas, I seriously can't beleive your against mein kampf. It seems right up your ally. No joke.

 

If you can find someone in this forum that fits this description, point them out and I'll have at them. You honestly make me laugh if you think the nonsense you prattle on about is rational. Sorry but I been through this with you too many times and the feeling of talking to a stone wall hasn't quite left me even after all this time. I even know how you'll dismiss this post before you do it. TYPICAL.

 

Possible solution...

Bin Laden claims our presence in the Middle East is why they attacked us. That seems more reasonable to me than Jihad. Seriously, if I were masterminding a Jihad to sweep my ideals across the world, I surely would not target the strongest country first. I'd knock down some smaller and weaker countries and add their resources to my arsenal before I went after the big dog. It just doesn't make sense. If it were really a move to take over the world, they must be smart enough to know that they are not powerful enough to start with us... unless the plan is to draw us out, spread us thin and weaken us for the kill, in which case we're playing right into their hands.

So I would propose we pull out, and I mean everywhere. Bring the US armed forces back into the US. What gives us the right to play world police anyway? Secure our borders and begin producing in this country. Build this country back up and let the world do what it does. We then leave no one with a suitable reason to attack us... so, if someone should attack us, we then have a full declaration of war by Congress... not an authorization to the President for the use of force so that all of those pathetic Congressmen who have their eyes set on the White House can later say "I'd never have authorized the use of force if I knew how badly it would be managed"... If Congress declares war, you can bet that it will go very differently. Declare war, rally the troops, fight a full on war, win and come back home... and I mean make it clear... If we know that they are in Pakistan when they attack us, then we declare war on Pakistan and we hit with everything we've got short of nukes. We make it so that no country would dare allow the presence of one of these terror groups to grow for fear of the realization of what will happen if an attack on our country results from their negligence. We do not need to be the police or architects for other countries...

If we keep this up, we will end up paying a very heavy price. We are spreading and spending ourselves too thin. We are opening the door for some of the stronger nations who might just like to sit in our seat to knock us off. You can laugh and think about how impossible that seems as strong as we are, but I'd be willing to bet that the Roman nationals felt the same way.

That's my solution... but what do I know?

 

Any different than most of the civilized world claiming Iraq had WMD's? Why keep beating that old misconception to death. IF he lied, wouldn't the Democratic Congress have him impeached by now? Hmmmmmmm? I can't wait for an unintelligent response from a foreigner against my country's President!

 

There even Crhistians and Jewish that do similar things. I think fanatics exists in all religion. How you think so many peoples end up going hell - all these hypocrites fanatics try tell you going hell, when in fact they ones with one way ticket.

I think solution is ignore fanatics of all religins, or maybe gater all up and send somewhere kill each other.

 

Problem is, most of Democrats in your congress have their own scandals to. How they to go after G. Bush when he have information on their sexperiences and bribes etc.?

Maybe you are soldier in USA, I respect you serve your country. Too bad so many in government there think that USA soldiers not worht so much so they send them for fodder. I think USA soldiers belong back in USA protect USA and help of disasters etc.

 

Well we know without a shadow of a doubt that Sadam used Mustard Gas and other toxins against his enemies so yes in the strictest sence he had WMD's, what happend to them is anyones guess, did he have nukes, I doubt it but he was trying, did he have a decent delivery system for chemical or Biological wepons, in the short range yes, long range no but again he was working on it.
Yes there are fanatics in all religions and also in political parties

 

Most of time these fanatics are minority, but they are majority of stupid noise so they make bigger than actually are.

 

Oh Orc, I be to differ, there is an exceptionally effective 'long range' delivery system in the evergrowing radical world of the mideast. It's called the human vector.

 

LOL Ben I was discounting that but have mentioned it in a previouse post & agree with you 100% put someone on a plane infected with something like Ebola!!

 

This is what should happen if Americans ever get control of their government back from the globalists who have hijacked it. People are looking for excuses to keep the military at Cold War levels even though the Cold War is over because there is money to be made and power to be had. Terrorism is the replacement for Communism as the perpetual enemy at the door. We don't need most of those forward military bases anymore for any legitimate defense reason. But the globalists dominating Washington DC don't want to return any power or money to the people, to whom it rightfully belongs.

 

Dear God, I wouldn't wish that on anyone, but these radicals bent on destruction will do it...

 

Actually ebola would be good thing for fanatics, then they have something take them their faker.