If only I would put YOU in charge of the things I say. Maybe I'll get a frontal lobotomy and then you and I would sound exactly the same. Obviously, your frontal lobe has atrophied from lack of use.
Sorry to hear that. More touting for Obamacare? Oh, I am well aware of that, but that does not explain this; "3) When did I ask for an apology?" So you think 2 judges are lying? Interesting! Funny, but in between all the important news, I have heard some such "toutings". However, there have been too many stories on Obama's total screw ups. Hmm? You are bored. See above. Anyone who supports pursuing false charges solely for political purposes is doing so. And at this stage, that is all that is there. Kind of like what you and your compadres did with Christie and Palin. FYI; "Palin's family had to spend more than $500000 on legal fees fighting these ethical lawsuits which are partisan in nature, frivolous and politically motivated." "One example of a lawsuit is the ethics complaint that has been filed against her that claims a conflict of interest because she wore an Arctic Cat logo gear during the Iron Dog snowmobile race that her husband participates in." Funny, but what on earth does a winter coat have to do with a conflict of interest - about as much as purporting Walker is guilty of what the judges have ruled as baseless.
And I quote...... "Anyone who supports pursuing false charges solely for political purposes is doing so." Only a moron would say "WELL SAID!" Are you just cheerleading for the sake of cheerleading? Anyone who is cheerleading solely for partisan reasons is doing so. Idiots grunting for other idiots.
Oh Little Joe, Little Joe, Little Joe.... it's funny to sit back and watch you squirm. You are so anti-Scott Walker it's pitiful. Didn't you even attend a rally or some such nonsense in opposition to him? You want to see the man indicted, impeached or otherwise removed from office so badly, but there's nothing on him. You keep railing against him saying he's going to be "indicted" for this or "indicted" for that, but it all boils down to the fact that you're just full of shit. As usual. BTW, how is the Chris Christie investigation coming along? Shouldn't he (according to you) be indicted or impeached by now?
Watching me squirm? Are you sure that you aren't just watch something else squirm in between your fingers? Because it seems like you're verbally jacking off.
Correction: When I find your stupid ass comments unworthy of a dignified response, I give you exactly what you deserve. You should be used to this by now.
Why would you even ask that rlm? If you'd like me to tout the ACA I will though. Just not in this thread as it not related to the OP. I spent 3 days in the hospital in 2013 without insurance and have now spent 3 days in the hospital with insurance. The figures might surprise you. Again. You brought up the the apology that I never asked for. Are you trying to go somewhere with this since I had to provide the answer? Instead of trying to put words in my mouth why don't you address the fact that I stated such things happen in politics frequently against BOTH sides. When a Democrat is accused of something and it doesn't go the way you like it what is your reaction? Yet he's still in office even though he's committed so many "screw ups" that the Republicans have wastes soooo...... much taxpayer money on. Funny how that works in your mind apparently. Obviously. See above. I'm bored enough to respond to your baseless comments. That bit of "wisdom" is not only laughable but absolutely PRICELESS! What I think in Indiana doesn't cost a friggin' dime to those in other states when it comes to their state matters. I can dislike those folks all I want just as you can dislike President Barack Hussein Obama. Please allow me to quote you. "However, there have been too many stories on Obama's total screw ups." How much taxpayer money has been spent on this because of "you and your compadres" rlm? Money that comes out of ALL of our pockets for real. Not your imaginary "a guy in Indiana is costing people in Wisconsin" scenario fantasy. Take a long look in the mirror the next time you decide to post such rubbish.
The difference being: Holder did approve spying on Rosen. Clinton did memo a letter denying additional reinforcements to Benghazi. Lerner did target the Tea Party. Obama did promise you could keep your doctor knowing it was a lie. Obama did promise you could keep your insurance knowing it was a lie. Brian Harrison did contribute significantly to Obama. Holder did approve Fast and Furious. Obama did approve changing Obamacare (costing us BILLIONS). Obama did promise to "eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses.” Obama did promise to "have five days to look online and find out what’s in it before I sign it,” Obama did promise to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely. ETC.!!!!!!!!!!! Costing us taxpayers literally BILLIONS OF DOLLARS! So please pardon us if we ask them to spend a few million trying to cut his BILLIONS. Yes that is a damn shame. Oh, and absolutely none of those have been thrown out of court except maybe where Holder has refused to pursue charges. Gee! I wonder why!! And I am sorry to hear you have no friends outside of Indiana.
And I forgot to mention Egypt, Syria, Iran, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Libya, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc.
Ruh-rho Scooby...... Documents Allege Scott Walker Pressured Groups To Donate To Campaign | By TODD RICHMOND and M.L. JOHNSON Posted: 08/22/2014 10:23 pm EDT Updated: 08/23/2014 10:59 am EDT MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Newly released court documents include excerpts from emails showing that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's recall election campaign team told him to instruct donors to give to a key conservative group that would run ads for Walker and distribute money to other conservative groups backing him. The documents released Friday by a federal appeals court also show that prosecutors believe Walker personally solicited donations for conservative group Wisconsin Club for Growth to get around campaign finance limits and disclosure requirements as he fended off the recall attempt in 2012. Aides told Walker to tell donors that they could make unlimited donations to Wisconsin Club for Growth without having the gifts publicly disclosed. Wisconsin Club for Growth then funneled the money to other conservative groups that advertised on Walker's behalf. "As the Governor discussed ... he wants all the issue advocacy efforts run thru one group to ensure correct messaging," Walker fundraiser Kate Doner wrote to campaign adviser R.J. Johnson in April 2011, a little more than a year before the recall election. "We had some past problems with multiple groups doing work on 'behalf' of Gov. Walker and it caused some issues ... the Governor is encouraging all to invest in the Wisconsin Club for Growth." It's not clear whether Walker followed the instructions from his team. But the documents say millions of dollars later moved from donors he was set to speak with to Wisconsin Club for Growth, which in turn funded groups backing Walker in the recall election. The documents are part of a secret investigation into whether Walker's campaign illegally coordinated with conservative groups during the run-up to the June 2012 recall, which was spurred by anger over Walker's signature law stripping most public workers of nearly all their union rights. The probe has dogged Walker as he is locked in a dead heat with Democratic Mary Burke in the governor's race and considers a 2016 presidential run. In one of the documents, for example, Walker was scheduled to meet in spring of 2012 with real estate mogul Donald Trump, who gave Wisconsin Club For Growth $15,000 days later, prosecutors said, citing emails and bank statements. Other Wisconsin Club for Growth donors included Gogebic Taconite LLC, which has proposed opening a 4 ½-mile long iron mine in northern Wisconsin. The company gave $700,000 to Club for Growth in 2011 and 2012. Walker signed legislation last year streamlining state mining requirements and paving the way for the project. The documents don't show whether Walker directly solicited donations from that company. A spokesman for the company did not return a message seeking comment. The pages contain mostly briefs and other legal documents filed by the prosecutor leading the probe, Wisconsin Club for Growth and others involved in the case. Many contain excerpts from investigators' statements, but the statements themselves weren't included in the release. Portions of some documents remain blacked out. Federal law allows groups like Wisconsin Club for Growth to accept unlimited anonymous contributions as long as they engage in only limited political activity. Prosecutors contend Walker and the club stepped over a line by working together to secretly funnel unlimited sums to groups backing Walker. As one example, investigators say Walker was set to participate in a December 2011 conference call with James Buchen, a top official with Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, the state's largest business group. Wisconsin Club for Growth gave WMC $2.5 million the following year, which WMC used to produce and air commercials promoting Walker and criticizing his recall opponent, Democrat Tom Barrett. WMC spokesman Jim Pugh said the group spent millions to educate the public during the recall election. He declined to talk about the club, saying WMC does not discuss its donors. Walker's campaign issued a statement Friday saying Walker isn't a target in the probe. However, the documents indicate his recall campaign manager Keith Gilkes is. Gilkes did not immediately respond to a message left late Friday night requesting comment. Wisconsin Club for Growth attorney David B. Rivkin said in an email that it should come as no surprise that Walker would "encourage support" for groups that back him and there's no evidence to support the investigation. A federal judge in Milwaukee halted the probe in May after Wisconsin Club for Growth filed a lawsuit alleging the investigation violated its free speech rights and the prosecutors are liberals out to harass and tarnish conservatives. The prosecutors have asked the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to allow them to restart the probe. The court released the documents tied to that appeal in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of media and open government groups. The documents became briefly available on a federal court website Friday afternoon. Attorneys have been arguing over which ones should be made public, and the records were quickly removed. ___ Johnson reported from Milwaukee. Associated Press writer Dinesh Ramde in Milwaukee contributed to this story.
"A federal judge in Milwaukee halted the probe in May after Wisconsin Club for Growth filed a lawsuit alleging the investigation violated its free speech rights and the prosecutors are liberals out to harass and tarnish conservatives." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/22/documents-scott-walker-campaign_n_5702016.html
I agree. You most definitely are. By the way. I have friends and relatives in Wisconsin which is outside of Indiana last time I checked.