Sad Little Men of the GOP

My original quote as you questioned was;

I have no idea what math school you went to, but in every one I know of "80-90 percent" includes both 80% and about 80%.

 

But it doesn't include your claimed 50%. But I understand your logic. If they say it is between 80 and 90, you think 50. Fine school of math. Home school valedictorian?

 

So show me where I "claimed" it was 50%. Or better yet, so me where any figure has been released and supported with accurate data.

 

^LOL. you did say this

right?

Why even bother quoting them at 80-90 if you are going to make the wild hinder completely unsupported speculation of 50? You fallaciously try to impute that as their number. Taint their quote then try to use it in support of your lame failed argument.

 

I do not consider that "claimed", but just for grins, say I did. Prove it is wrong! You can't even prove the insurance companies have received 50% of the applications.

 

You don't grasp the concept of imputing onto others. If you have something to say, a point to make, or some such, do it. And back it up. Put something up for the rest to consider. (and try to keep it clearly relevant to the OP or the post you quote) Thanks for trying

 

You have spent the last 2 pages trying to tell me that 80% figure is wrong, but when I ask you what the number really is, you try to pass the buck.

 

First off I don't care what the number is, nor do I see any special significance at this time as to what the day by day premium payments status is. But if you can explain why you feel it matters, and come up with real numbers as to premiums in 'late payment status' correlated with dates, I'll look at it. Just for fun contrast it with renters insurance and auto insurance premiums.

You seem to harbor some whacked belief that it matters. Let the program get fully implemented, then pass judgement when representative data exists. Proper analysis will be over years of varying economic conditions and all sorts of other complicating factors - after it happens.

 

But you used to!

and

 

LOL. I was politely trying to figure out how you thought it mattered. But I am not interested enough to ask again.

 

Why? Have you figured after 8 times you could not justify anything?

 

LOL. Justify what? Are you drinking?

 

Yep! Straight lemonade. I have one every night.

 

So then, you are having a diabetic reaction?

 

Sugar free so I am poisoning myself.

 

80 - 90 % are going to pay? OOPS!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...of-GA-Obamacare-Enrollees-Have-Paid-For-Plans

 

Additionally, in Susan Estrich's (whose as far left as they come) latest column, she lamented the shortage of healthcare providers willing to work with Obamacare-covered patients.
**Maybe that's why they aren't paying? Why pay for insurance no one will accept?

 

Please explain how the fructose is not present is straight lemonade you knucklehead.

 

Because straight also has a definition having to do with alcohol, idiot. It does not have a meaning regarding its source.

 

But your statement was about sugar free. But we all understand your comprehension issues.