Richard Dawkins Sux

Discussion in 'Religion' started by Blueindian65, Oct 12, 2009.

  1. Blueindian65

    Blueindian65 New Member

    yeap he does, and he had sex with mrs garriosn :)
     
  2. awozny

    awozny New Member

    Dawkins is completely right about what he teaches. Evolution is a fact not a hypothesis. If you disagree put down your bible and pick up a text book once in awhile. Evolution has been proven in all the major sciences. Therer is no God, never has been a God. If you believe in a God why not pick Zeus, Apollo, or Athena. They are all as plausible as the christian God the sheep follow.

    Only a sheep needs a shepard.
     
  3. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther


    God's evidence is all around you. Stop and look sometime.
     
  4. Blueindian65

    Blueindian65 New Member

    prety weak argument form the Atheist

    TOM: Right on Brother. We may disagree about 9-11, but firmly on the same page when it comes to Richard Dawkins being a hater


    Awozny: Atheist make this argument a lot. I personaly belive in evolution as a natural process. Also I am not a fundamentalist, and belive more in a form of devine Anarchy. John Caputo wrote and amazing book calld "The weekness of God" The title comes form first corenthians where paul sates that the weakness of God is stronger than the strogest man and the foolishness of God is wiser than the wiset man. It is a very deep book and requires lots of knowledge about Deconstruction and Post-structural (a form of postmodernism) philosophy.

    "Therer is no God, never has been a God. If you believe in a God why not pick Zeus, Apollo, or Athena. "

    U are fundamentaly wrong about this. To quote a teacher of mine "i've been to mount olympia and zeuse is not there". On the other hand the bible is full of information that is factualy true. Lots of "discrepianceys" in the bible are due to misinturpritations of the bible, and people taking it out of context. If you would like to have a discoution of Biblical Hermenutics we can go there.

    As an example. There is more first hand data for the excistance of Jesuse Christ and his miracles than there are of the existance of Julius Ceaser.

    And more with Philosophy, the love (Philo) of (sophia) Wisodm:

    YOU CAN NOT PROVE A NEATIVE: This is why I think Richard Dawkins SuX he uses illogical arguments. Fine eveolution exist, but that does not mean God does not exist. To repeat YOU CAN NOT PROVE SOMETHING DOES NOT EXIST
     
  5. Byrd740

    Byrd740 New Member

    @Blueindian65 :
    Richard Dawkins never said evolution proved "God" does not exist, he says that it is very unlikely or unnecessary. He doesn't believe in imaginary friends, which neither do I. Like RD's ads say: "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life."
     
  6. KLJ

    KLJ Really Smart Guy

    Dawkins' problem is that he comes off as angry and sanctimonious.
     
  7. tomcorona

    tomcorona Anti republican truther

    Sounds a lot like the republican party.
     

Share This Page