< ))) republicans ))) And Sex Education

But, hey, iqless has to be rejoicing today...his master is back! I'll bet ol' fog-of-war is giving iqless quite the lecture for trying to carry the far left whacko's water in his absence.

***psst, foggy, your boy didn't do a very good job while you were gone. A couple of the clowns tried to jump in & help but their attempts seemed half-hearted. (I guess it was kinda hard to fake support of such stupid posts).

 

Oh the things that are justified with the phrase "just concerned".

I always tell you when I'm pulling your leg. I only do that to make a point. Believe me or don't.

 

He did an excellent job of expressing his own opinions! But to be perfectly fair, your posts ARE pretty pathetic and it wouldn't surprise anyone that someone didn't bother getting excited about anything YOU post.
It's funny that you view people on the Left as all being of one opinion when they are no different than people on the Right having the same opinions. It's called the political divide and the rest of us recognize that we probably agree with those that are on our side of that political divide. Do you really believe that your opinions are all that different than those on your side of the political divide? Really? Well come on down from your own personal pedestal and realize that there is no opinion that you have that isn't probably widely shared by the rest of the Right-wingers you routinely parrot. I guess you'd have to actually pull your head out of your ass first and I find that highly unlikely. Yeah! I'm back!

 

Oh, so now lying is referred to as "pulling your leg"? You're like the boy who cried wolf. I don't believe you.

 

You were required to post this public display of support, weren't you?

 

< )) republicans ))

...sure are excited to see you...in a thread about sex no less...

...ewwwwwwww!

 

And I don't care...

 

As you can see, Duhvid is still lying his brains-out...I'm surprised he had any left in that noggin' of his to lose.

Dumb and dumberette still pant at his feet, of course....like good dogs.

Gohmert is still an idiot, of course.

 

I think of it more as an objective assessment of your idiocy.

 

OMG! What indoctrination have you been to. The last I heard, employment today is still not recovered to what it was 4 ½ years ago. And to even suggest that the deficit is "plummeting" is nothing but idiocy.

 

Alright!! It rolls out of bed (or out from under it's rock?) right on queue!!
Are you singing "Fog-of-war has come to save the day!!" (in your best Mighty Mouse imitation)??

 

Ssshhhh, that's not the narrative he's exposed to.

 

I guess I could ask you the same question.

US deficit expected to shrink to $759bn

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0f681f22-e80c-11e2-babb-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2YZ3f4epH

 

Let's see, 4 1/2 years ago would be January 2009. What was the unemployment rate back then? And what is it today? Hum? At least you are consistent...consistently wrong.
YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAnnual
2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4
2005 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9
2006 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4
2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 5.0
2008 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.8 7.3
2009 7.8 8.3 8.7 9.0 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.8 10.0 9.9 9.9
2010 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.6 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.8 9.3
2011 9.1 9.0 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.9 8.6 8.5
2012 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.8
2013 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.6

 

Sorry, but I am not going to sign up for your bs.

 

Just what did I say about UNemployment? I said EMPLOYMENT.
BTW, using the BLS data, we have just this year succeeded in equaling the employment as when BO took over.

 

Look where the u/e rate really took off. Hmmm...what devastating world event occured at that same time?
Seems 6.5% is the absolute lowest u/e has been under BO while 6.1 was the highest it ever got under Bush.
Exactly how much time does BO get to fix the problems he swore to fix...the problem you elected him to fix?
And to burst your bubble even more, underemployment has also become part of BO's "new normal"...wonder how we account for that? You know, when confronted, Paul Krugman didn't dispute an effective u/e rate as high as 17.5% when you figure in underemployment & people who have given up looking for a job in BO's economy.....people like iqless probably.

 

Funny, but the CBO using Obamanomics NEVER forecasts a balanced budget through 2021. http://www.cbo.gov/publication/21999

 

Funny, we were talking about a plummeting deficit and now you've changed to talking about a balanced budget when you are proven wrong. How totally typical of YOU.

 

Really? The "employment rate"? What exactly is that?