Re: TROLLTYPES IN HERE

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by Mr Pounder, Jan 10, 2008.

  1. Mr Pounder

    Mr Pounder Guest

    "Holly" <noon_union@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:5deea57a-6fa2-4097-909a-c094e3a783d3@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
    On Jan 10, 8:09 am, anonyme <leroybu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > On Jan 9, 8:01 am, "JeanDArc~~" <jda000...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > DESCRIPTIONS OF TROLLTYPES

    >
    > > 1. The old definition

    >
    > > The old definition of a Troll is one who posts to generate the maximum
    > > number of follow ups. These are a very minor irritation, and can be
    > > considered to be advantageous to newsgroups.

    >
    > > 2 .The Irritating Troll

    >
    > > Some merely post drivel, or tirades against netnannies and netcops,
    > > often at a BI of over 20. In general they cause little real damage to
    > > newsgroups.

    >
    > > 3.The destructive Troll

    >
    > > In about the year 1999 a new breed of Troll appeared who have the
    > > declared intention of destroying a specific Target newsgroup. This is
    > > done by a variety of posts, (see Section 4) intended to drive normal
    > > posters away from the specific newsgroup.

    >
    > > When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups exceeds about
    > > 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to just give up and
    > > unsubscribe. Usenet, and particularly the uk.local.* hierarchy is for
    > > most users a hobby and if that hobby ceases to be enjoyable, the
    > > obvious answer is just to find another hobby.

    >
    > > Once a specific Target newsgroup has been laid waste as was
    > > uk.local.birmingham it becomes a Old Target newsgroup, This happened
    > > in about February 2000 it is being maintained a wasteground by
    > > crossposts from the current Target ng.

    >
    > > Alt.astrology.metapsych at the time of writing is totally destroyed by
    > > destructive trolls. This is reported
    > > at:http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/abusive_ISPs_list.htm

    >
    > > Here is a useful FAQ that explains what has happened to the group I
    > > created
    > > alt.astrology.metapsych:http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

    >
    > > 4. The nasty Troll

    >
    > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's ability
    > > to cause mayhem, they can become very nasty, posting from obviously
    > > incorrect variations of the name etc. insults, call them netcops,
    > > netnannies, homosexuals.

    >
    > > Various off usenet methods are also used to force the victim to stop
    > > posting: Subscribing the victim to hundreds of unwanted pornographic
    > > email newsletters, and sites. Complaining to employers about non
    > > existent misdemeanours. Sending garbage emails without indication of
    > > sender. Telephone calls at dead of night. Harassing the close
    > > relatives of victims.

    >
    > Hey! Thanks for the good ideas.
    >
    >
    >
    > > 5. The evil and illegal Troll

    >
    > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's ability
    > > to cause mayhem, they also forge posts in that persons name and
    > > internet address and libel them on usenet. Both these are illegal.

    >
    > > 6. How they are organised

    >
    > > They use private listservers to communicate between themselves. An
    > > archive of one such listserver is athttp://www.uklocaltrolls.fs2.com.
    > > For less important communications, they use Troll Communications
    > > newsgroup(s).

    >
    > > The listserver must have an owner(s) who can approve or deny access.
    > > Other than that anarchy reigns where each member does what he/she
    > > thinks fit. Thus because no leader or committee exists coordination
    > > with the group is impossible. Any agreement reached with one or more
    > > can instantly be abrogated by others.

    >
    > > Coordinated action can occur where it forwards their general aims- Hide
    > > quoted text -

    >
    > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
    >
    > - Show quoted text -


    Like you wuzn't in practice ...


    Ahhhhhhhhh Holly.

    Mr Pounder
     
  2. Mr Pounder

    Mr Pounder Guest

    "Holly" <noon_union@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:009057e8-aea5-44df-a704-41be00198822@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
    On Jan 10, 2:47 pm, "Mr Pounder" <MrPoun...@rationalthought.com>
    wrote:
    > "Holly" <noon_un...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    >
    > news:5deea57a-6fa2-4097-909a-c094e3a783d3@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
    > On Jan 10, 8:09 am, anonyme <leroybu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > On Jan 9, 8:01 am, "JeanDArc~~" <jda000...@hotmail.com> wrote:

    >
    > > > DESCRIPTIONS OF TROLLTYPES

    >
    > > > 1. The old definition

    >
    > > > The old definition of a Troll is one who posts to generate the maximum
    > > > number of follow ups. These are a very minor irritation, and can be
    > > > considered to be advantageous to newsgroups.

    >
    > > > 2 .The Irritating Troll

    >
    > > > Some merely post drivel, or tirades against netnannies and netcops,
    > > > often at a BI of over 20. In general they cause little real damage to
    > > > newsgroups.

    >
    > > > 3.The destructive Troll

    >
    > > > In about the year 1999 a new breed of Troll appeared who have the
    > > > declared intention of destroying a specific Target newsgroup. This is
    > > > done by a variety of posts, (see Section 4) intended to drive normal
    > > > posters away from the specific newsgroup.

    >
    > > > When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups exceeds about
    > > > 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to just give up and
    > > > unsubscribe. Usenet, and particularly the uk.local.* hierarchy is for
    > > > most users a hobby and if that hobby ceases to be enjoyable, the
    > > > obvious answer is just to find another hobby.

    >
    > > > Once a specific Target newsgroup has been laid waste as was
    > > > uk.local.birmingham it becomes a Old Target newsgroup, This happened
    > > > in about February 2000 it is being maintained a wasteground by
    > > > crossposts from the current Target ng.

    >
    > > > Alt.astrology.metapsych at the time of writing is totally destroyed by
    > > > destructive trolls. This is reported
    > > > at:http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/abusive_ISPs_list.htm

    >
    > > > Here is a useful FAQ that explains what has happened to the group I
    > > > created
    > > > alt.astrology.metapsych:http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

    >
    > > > 4. The nasty Troll

    >
    > > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's ability
    > > > to cause mayhem, they can become very nasty, posting from obviously
    > > > incorrect variations of the name etc. insults, call them netcops,
    > > > netnannies, homosexuals.

    >
    > > > Various off usenet methods are also used to force the victim to stop
    > > > posting: Subscribing the victim to hundreds of unwanted pornographic
    > > > email newsletters, and sites. Complaining to employers about non
    > > > existent misdemeanours. Sending garbage emails without indication of
    > > > sender. Telephone calls at dead of night. Harassing the close
    > > > relatives of victims.

    >
    > > Hey! Thanks for the good ideas.

    >
    > > > 5. The evil and illegal Troll

    >
    > > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's ability
    > > > to cause mayhem, they also forge posts in that persons name and
    > > > internet address and libel them on usenet. Both these are illegal.

    >
    > > > 6. How they are organised

    >
    > > > They use private listservers to communicate between themselves. An
    > > > archive of one such listserver is athttp://www.uklocaltrolls.fs2.com.
    > > > For less important communications, they use Troll Communications
    > > > newsgroup(s).

    >
    > > > The listserver must have an owner(s) who can approve or deny access.
    > > > Other than that anarchy reigns where each member does what he/she
    > > > thinks fit. Thus because no leader or committee exists coordination
    > > > with the group is impossible. Any agreement reached with one or more
    > > > can instantly be abrogated by others.

    >
    > > > Coordinated action can occur where it forwards their general aims-
    > > > Hide
    > > > quoted text -

    >
    > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

    >
    > > - Show quoted text -

    >
    > Like you wuzn't in practice ...
    >
    > Ahhhhhhhhh Holly.
    >

    Thems are fightin' wurds.

    Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr is fightin' wurds.

    Mr Pounder
     
  3. Mr Pounder

    Mr Pounder Guest

    "Naked Gonad" <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:e28bc192-fac8-4d3c-831f-79c1acce3adb@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
    > On Jan 12, 7:35 pm, "Mr Pounder" <MrPoun...@rationalthought.com>
    > wrote:
    >> "Holly" <noon_un...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    >>
    >> news:009057e8-aea5-44df-a704-41be00198822@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
    >> On Jan 10, 2:47 pm, "Mr Pounder" <MrPoun...@rationalthought.com>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> > "Holly" <noon_un...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

    >>
    >> >news:5deea57a-6fa2-4097-909a-c094e3a783d3@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
    >> > On Jan 10, 8:09 am, anonyme <leroybu...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    >>
    >> > > On Jan 9, 8:01 am, "JeanDArc~~" <jda000...@hotmail.com> wrote:

    >>
    >> > > > DESCRIPTIONS OF TROLLTYPES

    >>
    >> > > > 1. The old definition

    >>
    >> > > > The old definition of a Troll is one who posts to generate the
    >> > > > maximum
    >> > > > number of follow ups. These are a very minor irritation, and can be
    >> > > > considered to be advantageous to newsgroups.

    >>
    >> > > > 2 .The Irritating Troll

    >>
    >> > > > Some merely post drivel, or tirades against netnannies and netcops,
    >> > > > often at a BI of over 20. In general they cause little real damage
    >> > > > to
    >> > > > newsgroups.

    >>
    >> > > > 3.The destructive Troll

    >>
    >> > > > In about the year 1999 a new breed of Troll appeared who have the
    >> > > > declared intention of destroying a specific Target newsgroup. This
    >> > > > is
    >> > > > done by a variety of posts, (see Section 4) intended to drive
    >> > > > normal
    >> > > > posters away from the specific newsgroup.

    >>
    >> > > > When the percentage of Troll posts, including followups exceeds
    >> > > > about
    >> > > > 75% of the total posts, most readers seem to just give up and
    >> > > > unsubscribe. Usenet, and particularly the uk.local.* hierarchy is
    >> > > > for
    >> > > > most users a hobby and if that hobby ceases to be enjoyable, the
    >> > > > obvious answer is just to find another hobby.

    >>
    >> > > > Once a specific Target newsgroup has been laid waste as was
    >> > > > uk.local.birmingham it becomes a Old Target newsgroup, This
    >> > > > happened
    >> > > > in about February 2000 it is being maintained a wasteground by
    >> > > > crossposts from the current Target ng.

    >>
    >> > > > Alt.astrology.metapsych at the time of writing is totally destroyed
    >> > > > by
    >> > > > destructive trolls. This is reported
    >> > > > at:http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/abusive_ISPs_list.htm

    >>
    >> > > > Here is a useful FAQ that explains what has happened to the group I
    >> > > > created
    >> > > > alt.astrology.metapsych:http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm

    >>
    >> > > > 4. The nasty Troll

    >>
    >> > > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's
    >> > > > ability
    >> > > > to cause mayhem, they can become very nasty, posting from obviously
    >> > > > incorrect variations of the name etc. insults, call them netcops,
    >> > > > netnannies, homosexuals.

    >>
    >> > > > Various off usenet methods are also used to force the victim to
    >> > > > stop
    >> > > > posting: Subscribing the victim to hundreds of unwanted
    >> > > > pornographic
    >> > > > email newsletters, and sites. Complaining to employers about non
    >> > > > existent misdemeanours. Sending garbage emails without indication
    >> > > > of
    >> > > > sender. Telephone calls at dead of night. Harassing the close
    >> > > > relatives of victims.

    >>
    >> > > Hey! Thanks for the good ideas.

    >>
    >> > > > 5. The evil and illegal Troll

    >>
    >> > > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's
    >> > > > ability
    >> > > > to cause mayhem, they also forge posts in that persons name and
    >> > > > internet address and libel them on usenet. Both these are illegal.

    >>
    >> > > > 6. How they are organised

    >>
    >> > > > They use private listservers to communicate between themselves. An
    >> > > > archive of one such listserver is
    >> > > > athttp://www.uklocaltrolls.fs2.com.
    >> > > > For less important communications, they use Troll Communications
    >> > > > newsgroup(s).

    >>
    >> > > > The listserver must have an owner(s) who can approve or deny
    >> > > > access.
    >> > > > Other than that anarchy reigns where each member does what he/she
    >> > > > thinks fit. Thus because no leader or committee exists coordination
    >> > > > with the group is impossible. Any agreement reached with one or
    >> > > > more
    >> > > > can instantly be abrogated by others.

    >>
    >> > > > Coordinated action can occur where it forwards their general aims-
    >> > > > Hide
    >> > > > quoted text -

    >>
    >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

    >>
    >> > > - Show quoted text -

    >>
    >> > Like you wuzn't in practice ...

    >>
    >> > Ahhhhhhhhh Holly.

    >>
    >> Thems are fightin' wurds.
    >>
    >> Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr is fightin' wurds.
    >>
    >> Mr Pounder

    >
    > Fancy a bun fight?
    >
    > Gonad (fastest bunfighter in the west)


    Bum fight?

    Mr Pounder
     

Share This Page