Lefty <leftydrude@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- 8e2c919a2e6c@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > See, I come here every once in a while to watch flame wars. See, nobody fucking cares. > Here's the thing- unless they've gone after you IRL and made threats, > you aren't being stalked. It would be considered cyberstalking if they > had sent you threatening emails or instant messages, but anything said > on a group is not stalking, because you have the option to ignore it. > Only when they invade your privacy can you make a legitimate claim > that your freedom to ignore their taunts has been taken away and you > are therefore a victim of harassment. If this happens, you have > recourse. You can block their emails and report them to their ISP. If > they have made threats of physical harm, you can contact police. Question: What the HELL are you talking about? > But I suspect that this is not the case. The "stalking" consists only > of flaming on usenet. In that case, have the decency to flame back and > give us a show rather than mewling like sissies. You first, Tough Guy. > If you don't want to do that, I propose you do the following; if you > do not like AUK, don't read AUK or engage in conversation with people > you know to be AUKers. Is that impossible for you to do? Why, yes. Yes it is. Got a problem with that? > Rant over. Oh, is that what you call a rant? Pffft. That wasn't a rant; that was just you moaning because nobody magically determined what kinds of posts you like to see and subsequently filled the newsgroup up with them for your personal viewing pleasure. Please to be leaving a complete detailed description of precisely what you expect to see here, and everybody on the planet will take at least one hour out of each day to compose a special article tailored to your specifications. Then the next time you decide to honor Usenet with your royal presence, you will be happily inundated with billions and billions of articles that will, individually and collectively, satisfy your literary palate. ...Or you can just curl up on the floor and die. Your choice. Asshole.
"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message news:Xns9A358A019F8C7A7E90087C86051@127.0.0.1... > Lefty <leftydrude@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- > 8e2c919a2e6c@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > > > See, I come here every once in a while to watch flame wars. > > See, nobody fucking cares. > > > Here's the thing- unless they've gone after you IRL and made threats, > > you aren't being stalked. It would be considered cyberstalking if they > > had sent you threatening emails or instant messages, but anything said > > on a group is not stalking, because you have the option to ignore it. > > Only when they invade your privacy can you make a legitimate claim > > that your freedom to ignore their taunts has been taken away and you > > are therefore a victim of harassment. If this happens, you have > > recourse. You can block their emails and report them to their ISP. If > > they have made threats of physical harm, you can contact police. > > Question: What the HELL are you talking about? > > > But I suspect that this is not the case. The "stalking" consists only > > of flaming on usenet. In that case, have the decency to flame back and > > give us a show rather than mewling like sissies. > > You first, Tough Guy. > > > If you don't want to do that, I propose you do the following; if you > > do not like AUK, don't read AUK or engage in conversation with people > > you know to be AUKers. Is that impossible for you to do? > > Why, yes. Yes it is. Got a problem with that? > > > Rant over. > > Oh, is that what you call a rant? Pffft. That wasn't a rant; that was > just you moaning because nobody magically determined what kinds of posts > you like to see and subsequently filled the newsgroup up with them for your > personal viewing pleasure. Please to be leaving a complete detailed > description of precisely what you expect to see here, and everybody on the > planet will take at least one hour out of each day to compose a special > article tailored to your specifications. Then the next time you decide to > honor Usenet with your royal presence, you will be happily inundated with > billions and billions of articles that will, individually and collectively, > satisfy your literary palate. ...Or you can just curl up on the floor and > die. Your choice. > > Asshole. Gregvk, weren't you a little hard on the Beav today? Number One
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:34:22 GMT gregvk scribed: > Lefty <leftydrude@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- > 8e2c919a2e6c@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > >> See, I come here every once in a while to watch flame wars. > > See, nobody fucking cares. I think you're being too subtle. > Asshole. Ahh, that's better. -- Neredbojias Riches are their own reward.
"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message news:Xns9A358A019F8C7A7E90087C86051@127.0.0.1... > Lefty <leftydrude@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- > 8e2c919a2e6c@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > > If you don't want to do that, I propose you do the following; if you > > do not like AUK, don't read AUK or engage in conversation with people > > you know to be AUKers. Is that impossible for you to do? > > Why, yes. Yes it is. Got a problem with that? Well greggie-poo, isn't it a bit hard to ignore AUK.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. WITH YOU CROSSPOSTING SHIT FROM THERE EVERY FUCKING 10 MINUTES!
On Jan 30, 3:34 pm, gregvk <g...@nospam.okthx> wrote: > Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- > 8e2c919a2...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > > > See, I come here every once in a while to watch flame wars. > > See, nobody fucking cares. You evidently do. You responded. > > Here's the thing- unless they've gone after you IRL and made threats, > > you aren't being stalked. It would be considered cyberstalking if they > > had sent you threatening emails or instant messages, but anything said > > on a group is not stalking, because you have the option to ignore it. > > Only when they invade your privacy can you make a legitimate claim > > that your freedom to ignore their taunts has been taken away and you > > are therefore a victim of harassment. If this happens, you have > > recourse. You can block their emails and report them to their ISP. If > > they have made threats of physical harm, you can contact police. > > Question: What the HELL are you talking about? Do you need that in another format? What exactly are you having trouble with? > > But I suspect that this is not the case. The "stalking" consists only > > of flaming on usenet. In that case, have the decency to flame back and > > give us a show rather than mewling like sissies. > > You first, Tough Guy. What made you think I was talking about you? After all, you don't even know what I'm talking about, right? > > If you don't want to do that, I propose you do the following; if you > > do not like AUK, don't read AUK or engage in conversation with people > > you know to be AUKers. Is that impossible for you to do? > > Why, yes. Yes it is. Got a problem with that? So now you not only do you know what I'm talking about, but you admit to being one of the whiners I'm talking about. Next you'll admit you really do care. Why not just tell the truth to begin with? You should just post a statement like; "Yes, I am a pussified coward who cannot handle being flamed, so I falsely accuse flamers of stalking me in the vain hope that somebody will believe me and weep for my plight. I'm an attention whore and a crashing bore, and I can't help myself, so I will continue to piddle my irrational drivel on AUK." > > > Rant over. > > Oh, is that what you call a rant? Pffft. That wasn't a rant; that was > just you moaning because nobody magically determined what kinds of posts > you like to see and subsequently filled the newsgroup up with them for your > personal viewing pleasure. Please to be leaving a complete detailed > description of precisely what you expect to see here, and everybody on the > planet will take at least one hour out of each day to compose a special > article tailored to your specifications. Then the next time you decide to > honor Usenet with your royal presence, you will be happily inundated with > billions and billions of articles that will, individually and collectively, > satisfy your literary palate. ...Or you can just curl up on the floor and > die. Your choice. > > Asshole. You've just guaranteed that I'll post more rants/moans in the future in the hope of being entertained by your petulant responses. What fun!
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:23:00 -0600, "Jonathan Herr" <dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote: > >"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message >news:Xns9A358A019F8C7A7E90087C86051@127.0.0.1... >> Lefty <leftydrude@netscape.net> wrote in news:8a7fedf2-4422-4a49-a544- >> 8e2c919a2e6c@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > >> > If you don't want to do that, I propose you do the following; if you >> > do not like AUK, don't read AUK or engage in conversation with people >> > you know to be AUKers. Is that impossible for you to do? >> >> Why, yes. Yes it is. Got a problem with that? > >Well greggie-poo, isn't it a bit hard to ignore AUK.... > >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. > >WITH YOU CROSSPOSTING SHIT FROM THERE EVERY FUCKING 10 MINUTES! Leslie doesn't have much choice, everyone keeps dumping him in the plonk file so he has to keep cross poasting to new groups looking for people to pay attention to him. Really, he's just a child whose parents use the Internet as his babysitter and he simply doesn't know how to get positive attention so he acts out, looking for negative attention. He just doesn't know any better. -- Onideus Mad Hatter mhm ? x ? http://www.backwater-productions.net http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog Hatter Quotes ------------- "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the best." "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you with it." "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist." "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend." "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!" "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my bad." "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..." "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols." "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?" "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others of its relevancy." "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper." "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are." "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just givin em out for free." "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little mess." "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny little minds'." "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts." "Those who record history are those who control history." "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for you." "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head." "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a function?" "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users." "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww, gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
On Jan 31, 7:46?pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote: > On Jan 30, 3:34 pm, gregvk <g...@nospam.okthx> wrote: > rant... Why don't you both shut the fuck up you pair of YANK CUNTS!
On Jan 31, 5:08 pm, UnusuallyPleasantB...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Jan 31, 7:46 pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 3:34 pm, gregvk <g...@nospam.okthx> wrote: > > rant... > > Why don't you both shut the fuck up you pair of YANK CUNTS! You don't like watching people fight? Then why do you come to AUK? Why come to usenet at all, for that matter? BTW, I'm not a Yank, you Earl Grey sipping, steak and kidney pie eating, vaguely effete wankbot from Cocksure-On-The-Thames who, like 95% of Britons, can no longer afford to buy a house in the country he's inordinately proud to live in. Enjoy your two hundred square foot third floor walkup with the slagheap view and the creeping damp in the masonry.
UnusuallyPleasantBear@googlemail.com wrote in news:1d1f04ea-2f76-4ecb-8213- 79d14d5d784d@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Jan 31, 7:46?pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote: >> On Jan 30, 3:34 pm, gregvk <g...@nospam.okthx> wrote: >> rant... > > > Why don't you both shut the fuck up you pair of YANK CUNTS! Please to be changing your nym to "UnusuallyWhinyBrat" as soon as possible. TIA
Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in news:h9g4q3lm818msepf8jrdsqu5gouj4gjmu9@4ax.com: >>Well greggie-poo, isn't it a bit hard to ignore AUK.... >> >>WITH YOU CROSSPOSTING SHIT FROM THERE EVERY FUCKING 10 MINUTES! > > He just doesn't know any better. It's hilarious when two of the heaviest crossposters whine about crossposting, especially when they both have decent filtering capabilities at their fingertips. /lol
UnusuallyPleasantBear@googlemail.com wrote in news:1d1f04ea-2f76-4ecb-8213- 79d14d5d784d@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Jan 31, 7:46?pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote: >> On Jan 30, 3:34 pm, gregvk <g...@nospam.okthx> wrote: >> rant... > > > Why don't you both shut the fuck up you pair of YANK CUNTS! > CUNTS are beautiful things. would you call either of these two beautiful?
On 31 Jan 2008 23:06:25 GMT, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >> He just doesn't know any better. >It's hi<COCK SLAP> The grownups are talking now, Leslie. Run along, it's time for your nap. -- Onideus Mad Hatter mhm ? x ? http://www.backwater-productions.net http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog Hatter Quotes ------------- "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the best." "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you with it." "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist." "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend." "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!" "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my bad." "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..." "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols." "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?" "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others of its relevancy." "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper." "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are." "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just givin em out for free." "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little mess." "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny little minds'." "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts." "Those who record history are those who control history." "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for you." "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head." "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a function?" "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users." "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww, gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message news:Xns9A36A3C98E789A7E90087C86051@127.0.0.1... > Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in > news:h9g4q3lm818msepf8jrdsqu5gouj4gjmu9@4ax.com: > > >>Well greggie-poo, isn't it a bit hard to ignore AUK.... > >> > >>WITH YOU CROSSPOSTING SHIT FROM THERE EVERY FUCKING 10 MINUTES! > > > > He just doesn't know any better. > > It's hilarious when two of the heaviest crossposters whine about > crossposting, especially when they both have decent filtering capabilities > at their fingertips. > Who are these two crossposters? I assume you are one of them considering how many stupid fucking crossposts from god-knows-where you're sent here. At least you're entertaining in your own k00ky way.
