Re: Awesome Guano Island moonscape

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by Bertie the Bunyip, Jan 20, 2008.

  1. BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
    1d0091154b2f@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

    > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip <S...@rt.1> wrote:
    >> BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
    >> 66b1e53d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
    >>
    >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every time?

    >>
    >> Personally, I think you should.
    >>
    >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
    >> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
    >> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served Usenet to
    >> > its knees.

    >>
    >> Vive la revolution!

    >
    > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to the
    > topic at hand.
    >


    What topic is that?


    Bertie
     
  2. Slipped Moebius <erroneouscorrection@yahoo.com> wrote in
    news:bb3e476d-8cbb-4768-88dc-a35031fadf0e@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

    > On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip <S...@rt.1> wrote:
    >> BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
    >> 1d0091154...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip <S...@rt.1> wrote:
    >> >> BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in
    >> >> news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
    >> >> 66b1e53d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

    >>
    >> >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and every
    >> >> > time?

    >>
    >> >> Personally, I think you should.

    >>
    >> >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte of
    >> >> > damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly faith-based
    >> >> > pretend atheist clowns could bring this Google/NOVA served
    >> >> > Usenet to its knees.

    >>
    >> >> Vive la revolution!

    >>
    >> > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to
    >> > the topic at hand.

    >>
    >> What topic is that?
    >>

    >
    > Ace Ventura.
    >

    Impertinent pup!


    Bertie
     
  3. BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:b385177a-b6d9-4460-8ac4-17c097a7d0ff@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

    > On Jan 20, 6:10 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> On Jan 20, 1:48 am, Bertie the Bunyip <S...@rt.1> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> > BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in
    >> > news:bf992a1c-4f53-4b31-8ae1-
    >> > 1d0091154...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

    >>
    >> > > On Jan 19, 5:17 pm, Bertie the Bunyip <S...@rt.1> wrote:
    >> > >> BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in
    >> > >> news:8c33ee00-634a-4d6d-96a3-
    >> > >> 66b1e53d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

    >>
    >> > >> > Say, why don't we quote the entire Old Testament each and
    >> > >> > every time?

    >>
    >> > >> Personally, I think you should.

    >>
    >> > >> > Perhaps if your brown-nosed tactics can accomplish a terabyte
    >> > >> > of damage-control crapolla per reply, as such you silly
    >> > >> > faith-based pretend atheist clowns could bring this
    >> > >> > Google/NOVA served Usenet to its knees.

    >>
    >> > >> Vive la revolution!

    >>
    >> > > That's what I thought. Sorry you can't honestly contribute as to
    >> > > the topic at hand.

    >>
    >> > What topic is that?

    >>
    >> > Bertie

    >>
    >> Whatever happened to your original "Awesome moonscape" topic?
    >>
    >> Is there a little something you spooks and moles of MI5/CIA have to
    >> say?
    >>
    >> Are you folks into hiding the original topic along with hiding those
    >> WMD?
    >> - Brad Guth

    >
    > That's odd, the Usenet lights went out with the last "Bertie the
    > Bunyip" reply on top of the Google/NOVA Usenet stack. Anyone got a
    > reason for that?



    Well, it's obvious, isn;t it?


    >
    > Our new and improved NASA, that for the past 8 years and counting as
    > having ignored all things Venus, is about to fold once again before
    > their own dumbfounded eyes of denial and evidence exclusion, in much
    > the same as our old NASA/Apollo fiasco that for some odd reasons still
    > can't be imaged from the best efforts of JAXA's Selene (KAGUYA) as
    > offering its 3D imaging that's offering more than sufficient 10
    > meters/ pixel resolution, as though our supposed "right stuff" is
    > having to continually hide under most any available moon rock because,
    > there's still nothing of any such bright and shiny Apollo technology
    > residing upon that physically dark as coal moon of ours (unless an
    > artificial crater counts).
    >



    You're a credit to your income bracket.


    Bertie
    >
     

Share This Page