I think the only way Trump could possibly have won was if the election was rigged. 17 intelligence agencies have confirmed Russian hacking WITH the intent of getting Trump elected. It wasn't like the Russians hacked anyone else but the DNC-connected entities after all. That is enough evidence in itself. The fact that Trump, who has operative after operative with Russian connections from Manafort to his recent Exxon appointee begs a lot of questions. This whole thing smells bad and trying to tamp down the criticism by calling Democrats sore losers and such is a tactic that will not work. Where there is Smoke, there is fire. Suddenly, I can see Russia from my country.
First, prove that the Russians did the hacking. Second, the DNC and the RNC were hacked so your assertion that it was only the DNC is false. Third, prove that the hack helped Trump. Of course, none of this can be proven. This story is dead in the water and will blow over in a week or so. It's just another lifeline the Democrats are trying to grab onto while they watch their power slip and fade. Donald Trump is going to be our president. You'd better get used to it. Some yawn-inducing story about Russia hacking our election is not going to change a thing. So, let's hear you say it: "PRESIDENT TRUMP"
Interesting fallacy. No one has CONFIRMED and INTENT. On the other hand, just what have the Russians NOT hacked. They hack whatever they wish and tat is a fact. But then there is the government's confidential network which is supposedly not on network and thus un-hackable. I seem to remember someone who purposely tried to feed Russia all HER info by avoiding the legally required security.
Not "President Trump, Brought to You by The Kremlin" . . . Hillary Clinton Exposed by The Kremlin, and . . . Hillary Clinton Done In by Herself
Geez, Obama's intel communities can't even decide amongst themselves what, if any, motive the hackers had in mind. This story is dying a very quick death.
Maybe the Russian did diddle with the results, but ........... Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts Joel Kurth and Jonathan Oosting , The Detroit News 1:31 p.m. EST December 13, 2016 Play 0:01 1:52 Fullscreen State to probe voting irregularities in Detroit State Elections Director Chris Thomas explains a state audit of 20 precincts in Detroit where ballot boxes contained fewer votes than counted in the election poll book. Chad Livengood, The Detroit News Buy Photo (Photo: Max Ortiz / The Detroit News) Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News. Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday. DETROIT NEWS Detroit’s voting irregularities spur state audit The Detroit precincts are among those that couldn’t be counted during a statewide presidential recount that began last week and ended Friday following a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court. Democrat Hillary Clinton overwhelmingly prevailed in Detroit and Wayne County. But Republican President-elect Donald Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes or 47.5 percent to 47.3 percent. Overall, state records show 10.6 percent of the precincts in the 22 counties that began the retabulation process couldn’t be recounted because of state law that bars recounts for unbalanced precincts or ones with broken seals. The problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn’t recount votes in 392 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. And two-thirds of those precincts had too many votes.
Thank You RLM!! This Russia shit is exactly that, shit!!! More of Lyin Joes lies and fake news propaganda. The hacks were leaks from the inside, period, even the FBI agrees. Fraudulent Hillary was ONLY electable by fraud, obviously did not fraudulenly commit enough fraud to become a fraud of a President. Go away Sniveling Snowflake Lyin Joe. Find a safe space and come back in 4 years with another loser commie crooked candidate. Or maybe you can learn from Recusant or Clembo how to be on the left side of a debate and not act like a snotty punk kid throwing a tantrum.
Yeah, the Democrats tried every underhanded tactic in the book and it still didn't help Crooked Hillary. I'm just happy we won't have to ever hear her screeching banshee wail coming from the Oval Office. Our country dodged a bullet with this one, folks.
Back in the 1950s, if you conspired with Russia, you could be hanged for it. Today, all the top republicans are allowing Russia to interfere in our elections because Russia backs the republicans. Maybe it's time for some hangings.
The democrats are still in charge of the DOJ, the democrats still run the WH, and it was the Democratic National Committee that was hacked. Yet somehow you manage to blame the Republicans? It might be interesting to try to follow your chain of thought. Nah! That could not possibly be interesting in your case.
Whatever happened to the liberal philosophy of engaging our enemy? BO (and every other dumbocrat) scoffed at Romney when Romney called Russia our biggest geopolitical threat & Hillary said we should empathize with our enemies. What happened, dummy?
Why do you guys keep calling it a hack when it was actually a leak? And did we forget about contents of the leak? Crooked Lyin Libs blame Russia for skewing an election? What about the DNC skewing Sanders out of the primary's he would have WON?????
Trump openly questioned whether US intelligence agencies are trustworthy, choosing instead to side with Russia. Putin is more trustworthy in Trump's view than our intelligence agencies. Trump and his thugs are more Russian than American.
It wouldn't be the first time BO has used a government agency to do his bidding, would it? ....and didn't the FBI dispute the CIA's assessment?