Pope Calls Out ‘Ideological Christians’ as a ‘Serious Illness’ - Listening GOP?

Also known as keeping things at your level.

 

But truly, isn't that where the little "souls" end up. What's not to like? We should be happy for them.

 

The "words" coming out of you never disappoint, Takiji.

 

Let's at least try to give them a first birthday party before sending them on their way.

 

At what point does the woman's right to decide whether the baby lives or dies end?

 

Apparently, at the point YOU decide? Who gave YOU that power?

 

See, unlike you, I have the balls to say what I believe & I believe every life has value.
So what about the gun question? Do you advocate the elimination of private gun ownership in the US?

 

Bingo. They start with the assumption is that they have the right to decide (their God gave it to them no doubt) but some of them will be generous and give the woman a say as well. Many of them won't even go that far but we have a liberal bunch of theocrats and authoritarians here.

 

So who exactly gave you the power to make decisions for any woman Mr. Balls? You won't answer THAT question because you can't. You know that you do not have the authority but that doesn't stop you from assuming it anyway. Personal responsibility Mr. Balls, personal responsibility.

 

They never can quite bring themselves to say it but they think they are doing God's work. They are taking their belief system and applying it to everyone else. They will never admit it but they are the Christian Taliban.

 

Well, let's see, there are laws on the books that say murder is forbidden (and I don't believe there are age restrictions, are there?) & if a pregnant women loses here baby during the commission of a crime, the assailant is prosecuted for murder....so, calling it murder or a crime really isn't solely or historically my judgment is it? I guess you abortion advocates are the ones who believe individuals get to make the call when a live can be snuffed out, huh?

 

So how about manning up & let us know if you believe whether or not private gun ownership should be banned in the US?

 

So you are simply enforcing the law? Is that really what you are saying? You're like an abortion sheriff or something? Last time I checked abortion wasn't illegal so you're not only the sheriff of abortion Mr. Balls, you're enforcing a law that doesn't even exist. In fact, your enforcing an imaginary law that the Supreme Court has specifically ruled isn't a crime. That does take some balls....Mr. Balls. You can have all the moral objections you want but any woman has the right to have an abortion according to the law, the medical profession, and the isn't against the Constitution of the country you live in. Maybe Mr. Balls should move?

 

How about going back and reading some of my old posts. I've stated my belief specifically on that subject several times. Is it my fault you don't let anything thing into your head that FOX hasn't put there?

 

So you think every single law is perfect and you follow them to a "T"?

 

Um, actually, you haven't. Vacillation really isn't being "specific".

 

Obfuscation (or beclouding) is the hiding of intended meaning in communication, making communication confusing, willfully ambiguous, and harder to interpret.

 

I'm not really sure what point you are attempting to make because your post basically claimed "it's the law, deal with it". I simply want to know, with that being your argument, do you agree with every law on the books?

 

You didn't simply ask a question. You defined my supposed position and then asked me to defend it based on your definition of my position. You broadened subject to the point of meaninglessness. If you have a point, and I'm pretty sure you don't, just make it. Don't tell me what I think. How many times to I have to tell you Right-wing nuts this?

 

OK, then what was your supposed position?