Osama bin Laden is DEAD!!

How many orders can one give from thousands of miles away? The SEALs were there Lehigh. Don't give a damn what President was in power (happened to be Obama) they acted. They had to.

Were you there?

 

If you don't think they were given orders to shoot Bin Laden on sight, that is your prerogative. I will choose logic over faith, okay?

 

You are of course all asuming that he is actualy dead and not been interogated at the moment what better way to rattle your enemy than to tell them Yep we killed him but Nope we wont show you the body or the holliday snaps And of course even if he is dead there is still that doubt in there minds that he is in fact spilling all he knows LOL

 

No. Not okay.
Furthermore I don't see what your "logic" is.

Try to put yourself in a Navy SEAL's position Lehigh. You are facing Bin Laden who is using a woman as a human shield. Your orders are to TRY and capture him or eliminate him. He could have a weapon, you have "invaded" a country and you have limited time. VERY limited time.
Your definite goal is he either leaves the country as a prisoner or a corpse.

You have trained for years at this point for such a situation (unlike you and I). You have to act fast and there IS the possibility you make the wrong decision. The situation is dangerous so you shoot. It's over. Bin Laden is dead.

It's not a logic vs. faith thing. It's a dangerous mission that turned out well.

A prisoner would be great but considering it's been ten years a corpse is good. Dead fish food can wake people up.

 

Have you joined the conspiracy wackjob club recently Steve? That is a hard lie to tell with re-election 16 months away.

 

The former CIA asset has been dead for about 10 years now. What I don't understand is why the apparent need to publicly present this spectacle at this particular time. I wonder what this is the prelude to. Maybe another false flag to institute some new security measure that people would normally balk at?

 

And you can prove he died ten years ago Tom Hell yep Lehigh everyone else wants to have a conspirasy theory of one kind or another and I was feeling left out of it

 

Now I read he was reaching for a weapon.

 

Just guessing, but I'd say the Seals had "Shoot to Kill" orders anyway, and not take him "Dead or Alive" ...The info coming out about it is chaotic though, so who knows...

 

He can't prove anything he says...

 

Actually, you may be closer than you think. They are now saying that the seals did take another individual with them. It may not be Usama they are interrogating, but someone is being interrogated.

 

667. Bin Laden's death is another trick (5/2/2011)

When people chanting for the news of Bin Laden's death, I have a sad feeling how ignorant people are cheated by this government. I also worry we may face a big "terror attack" planned by this government.

1. Since 911, I don't believe this government anymore. It is hijacked by a group of insiders. If they can cheat people with 911 such a big attack, what else can't they do? For those who insist to tarnish 911 truthers, one thing they can't deny is the "WMD" lie which justified war on Iraq. That's a big lie because it caused large civilian's casualty. Yet, that lie was neglected. The lier was awarded a second term of President because the inside group wants another war - Iran war. Bin Laden's death is only another soap opera - same like the death of Al Zarqawi. (so said Iraq Al Qaida)

2. There is a strategy purpose of Bin Laden's death - to justify a coming dirty bomb attack. The intelligence always arrange "provocative actions" to make the false flag terror attack reasonable. That was what we saw a month ago the "Quran burning" in Florida and the "veil ban" law passed in French. "Bin Laden's death" is a big one they push out today which indicates a big terror attack is going to happen recently.

3.It's a continuation of a series "nuclear crisis (bombing)" attempt since later last year. (see my posts from #651) You may verify it from rare report news. (not from US media)

Nine days later, on 4/27 there was an unprecedentary tornado storms attacked East side of America. Scientists suggested "some of the tornadoes may have been among the largest and most powerful ever recorded. " "2011 Tornado Outbreak Death Toll Hits 337, Second-Deadliest Day From Twister In U.S. History".

On 3/11, Japan suffered an earthquake biggest ever in its history. On 4/27, US suffered a largest and most powerful ever recorded tornado storms. When both failed to produce a nuclear pollution crisis in US, the Feds activates Bin Laden. Beware of a coming "nuclear bomb attack". (Or dirty bomb attack)

 

See everybody? Its a trick.

 

It is interesting that you use the words "this government". The premise that 9/11 was perpetrated by the Bush controlled government in order to justify a war is ridiculous. But now you are claiming that a completely different executive branch run by the democrats is doing the exact same thing. In order for that to be true, the entire country must be controlled by the same people no matter who the elected President is. Basically you are saying the the United States is not a free country and that our free elections are a sham. Who exactly are these all powerful people? What are their names?

Now here is the big question. If HAARP is so powerful as to cause the tornados in America and the earthquakes/tsunamis in Japan, why don't they simply use it to inflict natural disasters on Iran rather than paving the way for a conventional war?

Answer that conspiracy boy!

 

Not to your satisfaction undoubtedly Steve, but nevertheless it is true. That's why there will NEVER be "official" photos released of the operation (whatever it was), nor will there ever be any evidence of his "burial" at see. Fairly easy to debunk faked video or photos nowadays, which is why any evidence they might have been considering for release was scrapped. That being the danger of scrutiny. Hell, the specifics of the story have already changed several times, and will change many more times I'm sure.

 

So what is your theory? Be sure to include a motive for the administration to lie about it.

 

I don't know dude. Maybe a false flag...maybe some outrageous security measure that they want implemented. Bump in the 2012 jury pool maybe. Maybe a combination of things. The dude had been dead for years man. The lack of proof, in this digital age, seals it IMO.

 

So how did the US convince Pakistan to be outraged by the fake SEAL incursion to kill the guy who was already dead. Furthermore, this news is a guaranteed 5-10 bump in the polls. There is absolutely no way it would have been wasted in a non election year. When you guys make up your conspiracy theories, they need to make sense. Politicians care about one thing, getting re-elected. Everyone knows that the death of Bin Laden is a huge political win. Heck the Democrats are stating that Obama is unbeatable this week. If he was already dead, the Obama campaign would have released the information at a time that would benefit them politically. Perhaps October 2012, but not May 2011.

False flag for what. Do you suscribe to Katdung's wacko theory that HAARP is being used to create a future war against Iran and that this is simply and element of that grand conspiracy?

How can both the Republican administration under Bush and the Obama administration be involved in the same conspiracy? It doesn't make any sense.

 

Unlesss of course it is a conspiracy to confuse us

 

The whole Pakistan/US relationship has been pretty unexplainable for some time now. Since 9/11, it was even more unidentifiable. Like Israel/US relationship...strange IMO.
I don't know why it happened now versus some future date or even at all. Maybe as a prelude to having a good excuse to pull out of Pakistan without looking wimpy and trying to avoid battering from the right when we did depart. I don't know. I do know that if it actually occurred, we'd have evidence of it digitally in some fashion. Look at the fiasco they made hanging Hussein. You mean to tell me, if it really happened, that some form of proof would have been secured? Sure it would, and if that kind of proof surfaces, I'd reconsider my beliefs at that point, but it ain't gonna happen.
False flag for who the hell knows what. When the US economy crashes once and for all maybe, to help institute compliance with the upcoming security policies? I really do not know. Why did we commit any of the false flags we committed? We'll find out after I'm sure.
HAARP.....that's very real. Frighteningly real, even for a conspiracy nut like me. Bouncing s**t off the ionisphere has ramifications, seems to be. Weather manipulation is the ultimate weapon. I'm not saying it is responsible for Japan or the like but, I'm saying we'll never know, because there probably isn't any way to conclusively prove it one way or another. They sure are pretty secretive about a facility in the middle of nowhere that supposedly is doing some sort of research.
Bush...Obama....both puppets in the grand scheme of things. I think Obama is in way over his head and doesn't know what the F to do. He's changed his policies so many times now I quit keeping track of them. Just my opinion.