Here it is , in writing. Hillary will be our next POTUS. With so many lies and misdeeds, flip flops and problems in the current administration, the complete bumbling of the economy, weakness on foreign policy and socialist leanings, I predict Hillary will resign in the nick of time to primary BO. The Repos have no strong candidate at all. If they had a Reagan conservative running, it would be an easy takeover. Hillary is quietly digging and documenting dirt on BO, and she has a hardcore group of supporters and most importantly, Washington insiders on her side. She will very easily defeat BO. Landslide. I will vote for her IF there is not a STRONG true conservative in the mix. There, I put it in writing.
Very possible, but I sure hope not...and you don't have to worry..there won't be any formitable strong conservatives in the mix.
Hilary said she admired Margaret Sanger more than Thomas Jefferson. She said this on two seperate public occasions. Margaret Sanger said things such as this: "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923) Editor of The Birth Control Review from 1917 to 1938. Founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the world. Her goal in life: Sanger admitted her entire life's purpose was to promote birth control. An Autobiography, p. 194 Helped to establish the research bureau that financed "the pill," she contributed toward the work of the German doctor who developed the IUD. "Ernst Graefenberg and His Ring," Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, July-Aug. 1975, p. 345, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, by Elasah Drogin Sanger espoused the thinking of eugenicists -- similar to Darwin's "survival of the fittest" -- but related the concept to human society, saying the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, for example, was inferior. Pivot of Civilization, by Margaret Sanger, 1922, p. 80 On mandatory sterilization of the poor: One of Sanger's greatest influences, sexologist/eugenicist Dr. Havelock Ellis (with whom she had an affair, leading to her divorce from her first husband), urged mandatory sterilization of the poor as a prerequisite to receiving any public aid. The Problem of Race Regeneration, by Havelock Ellis, p. 65, in Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, p. 18. Ellis believed that any sex was acceptable, as long as it hurt no one. The Sage of Sex, A Life of Havelock Ellis, by Arthur Calder-Marshall, p. 88 On eradicating 'bad stocks': The goal of eugenicists is "to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks," wrote Dr. Ernst Rudin in the April 1933 Birth Control Review (of which Sanger was editor). Another article exhorted Americans to "restrict the propagation of those physically, mentally and socially inadequate. Hillary is also a member of the CFR and this is suspect at best. Just my humble thoughts.
Sorry Boss, I would rather have a Dem than a red diaper doper baby repo like McCain......If no Conservative, Im voting Dem. I too like you consider abortion the killing of innocent civilians........ BUT, to end it we ned a conservative. Plain and simple.
I just do not see Hill running against Obama. I'd say that we have a full 7 more years of Obama, just get used to that fact. Now that being said I am not super happy with everything the guy is doing and I like most Dems that I know feel pretty let down. Still though he is a two-termer.
As it stands right now, I think that second term is not anywhere near a foregone conclusion. I would have believed it a few months ago but the bloom is coming off the Presidential rose quickly and the Dems in Congress are eating their own. I am not saying that it is certain that Congress will flip or the Pubs will take the WH as it is a long ways off but it sure doesn't look like the impossibility it looked like a few months ago.
I can remember just as the primarys were starting, you predicted Hillary, saying " face it, Hillary is the next POTUS "... I'm sticking to my guns on this one. Every drop in the polls and every flop the Clintons are giddy......building that war chest of failures for her commercials. They will roll the youtubed lies more than Fox news
By the end of the first term, I believe Obama could have a lower approval rating than Bush did in his last term. But, except for the black community who inarguably will keep his numbers propped up, despite whatever debacle it has turned into. 3 years is a lot of time. Hard to tell who the republican candidate could be. Maybe it will be a fresh new popular senator who comes out of the blood bath in 2010? Who knows? I hope to God it's not Hillary. That would be like a bad, unexpected, horror movie sequel. The only consilation I took from that last election is that it had to be one or the other but at least not both. May not be much left for her to destroy by then though anyway.
The last election and results in the 1st 9 months have pretty much fit to a tee my last prediction. It is the best possible thing that could have happened to the conservatives. Note I did not say Republicans.
Vess, This is what blows a gaping hole in the racist argument. The blacks have a 19% or so stake...thats if EVERY SINGLE ONE votes and votes for BO. HE could not have and would not have been elected except for the white voters, libs, moderates and dems......it is mathmatically impossible to deny that Unless the conservatives show a strong candidate, of any party, indy, libiterian or Repo, the dems will go Hillary. That is if you do not subscribe to the Bilderberg theory, that is, that our Prez is placed and not elected. That theory is that BO is in place to see NWO is instituted. 1 or 2 terms.....We shall see.
I was still referring to his approval rating. They will prop up his approval rating no matter what he does or what ends up happening so it likely couldn't get below Bush's 13%. You don't have to tell me about white people voting for him. We've all watched white people teaching their children to sing praise songs to him haven't we? Votes? They were a given.
