Lets see 1st David off I am not protecting anyone, now I know you wont accept that as a fact because your ego will get in your way but it is the truth Then we have "And you make that sound so sincere" RLM Cent's response to my apology I think that shows just what sort of person you are, I made a honest mistake and apologised for it but Nooo you coudnt leave it at that could you LOL then you complain because I hit back at you LOL Well I will say it again tough learn to live with it and stop whining
That's a flat out lie. "What's his names" posts are no different than mine. He is the one who resorts to the name-calling...in fact, "what's his name" is way more gulity of everything you & he accuse me of yet you never take him to task.
I dont lie David, not to myself nor to you lot on the forum, show me a continual series of posts where any member continualy calls you by anything other than your given on line name, then I will show you as many as you want were you do it on a regular basis. Who exactly is whats his name? I dont recall a forum member with such a name and how do I as you put it Protect him?
Just to pick a few, try; Southern educated Right wing a$$hat your cross burning and tell your fellow white hooded buddies Angry old white uneducated basement-dwelling shut-in like your brain keeps out facts etc. Oh, and then you allow what's his name to continually violate the copyright laws without doing a thing about it. Hummmmmm???????????
As I dont know the 1st thing about American copyright laws I leave that one up to Peter, got a complaint in that dept then contact him, dont like the way I mod the forum contact him and complain So you are saying that this unknown forum member uses these terms instead of Davids name in every post he makes about David? care to link me to these posts?
If you believe this you are either delusional or in serious denial. What's his name has taken personal attacks & name-calling to a new level yet you let it slide. Why is that? Have you ever taken him to task for some of the vile comments he has spewed? I sure don't remember a time.
Lets see David just what a liar I am try looking at post number 35 in this thread and your response to the comments and tell me I took no action, try looking at other posts that I have deleted comments made about you and tell me that I am delusional LOL Sorry pal but they are there for all to see it is just that again that ego of your wants you to believe that you are picked upon when in fact I go out of my way to look after you (and you call me delusional LOL)
First, those were names he called me, not David. But I have no idea why that would be different. We are both conservatives. Second, I have links, but they are to the old forum. Third, a moderator who does not know the forum rules. How interesting. Try looking in CoinTalk Read more: http://www.cointalk.com/t34131/#ixzz1aEfxTbwV Or, you might try reading this post (the entire post); or this one;
Perhaps you should have made yourself clear it was so very confusing as I was talking to David and not you at the time, now care to link me to the posts were someone has called you these names? so I can see if they took place before or after Peters ruling on name calling I should point out that telling you that you are angry is hardly name calling, nor is Southern educated if that is what you are (unless you feel that somehow stigmatizes you?) Old white again how is that a insult? I am white and old but dont feel insulted if someone was to tell me that is what I am. Uneducated well that one is simply a opinion of you and hardly a insult, "Shut in" that is a new one for me care to expound upon what it means? as to me it says you are insular again not a insult is it? A$$hat now yes that would class as a direct insult As is the Klan reffrence (tell me what posts they are in and I will remove them) and give the user a warning not to call you that again Again as far as copyright is concerned I dont know enough about it, I dont know if what has been copied is in the public domain or not, now perhaps you would care to post links to the relevent articles that I have missed including links to the originals so I can see what is what. Rather than you just stating something is in violation try been a bit more pro active and helpful
If "dr moen, phd" is "a childish attempt by you to belittle him", but "Southern educated", "Angry", "old white", "uneducated", "basement-dwelling", "shut-in", etc. are not, I have no clue what kind of logic you are trying to follow. Try just believing me. They were 100% intended derogatorily. And, yes, since "they are to the old forum", it should be obvious that "they took place before or after Peters ruling on name calling". As for the two find remotely offensive, why is this time different from the other 20 times I have posted his comments - often with the links? Now the copyright issue, I guess you are telling me that you do not use your "Report" system since you have confirmed to me that it is working. If you looked at my reports, you would find the links you are asking for along with several other reports I bet you have done nothing about either.
Lets see the name calling I am reffering to is current and you are still using it, those you mentioned are as you say prior to the enforcement of the rules that is the difference end of argument. Bet away, I also have a life
It's funny to me that rlm has such an issue with other people possibly violating copyrights... yet has admitted he copies other peoples works all the time. I think most people would know the word for that type of mentality.
Maybe this will make sense to you. It is just like I-tunes. You pay to copy the tune. You are allowed to do with as you please on your computer. Why on earth would posting it back to where it was from be a problem? Only here I join to be allowed to copy the info. Now, Peter has posted the rules/law. Doug has posted the rules/law. If you think you know better than they, go argue with them.
Not really arguing the point, just wondered how you justified it to yourself, now I know lol Who's "Doug"?