Maddy McCann

Not so. Many doctors never get near dead bodies, ie GP's consultants, radiologists, ear nose and throat men, paediatricians etc. This woman fits into this category. I just wish I could remember what she did exactly.

 

There was a nasty murder in my town some years ago. A young mother went missing. The husband claimed she had left him. Her family new that she would never leave the children.

He fell under suspicion. He thought he was clever when he enlisted his brothers help. The brother sent letters to him purportedly from the dead women. The brothers dismembered the corpse in the bathroom. Parts of her went into the garbage. Limbs were left all over town in secret places for rats to dispose of.

Mentally the husband was quite strong. He stood up well to police interogation. The public then turned against him, followed by the diehards who had supported him. Eventually he was friendless. I think it was this and only this that broke him.He kept his innocent bull**** going for about a year.

Some people are this callous and determined to get away with it. I suspect the McCanns are too.

 

Book smarts and common sense don't always go hand-in-hand. I've known a lot of people who had college degrees and no common sense. I've also known a lot of people with good common sense and no college degree.

 

Good point.

 

Leonor killed and fed her own child to pigs. She deserved a lot worse.

 

Sounds like an awful leap of logic to go from a few drops of blood in a freezer to the conclusion that she fed her daughter to pigs. Don't cha think?

If the cops searched my house they would find quite a few of my daughters blood droplets all about. And she's just fine.

 

The mother confessed to beating her daughter and bloodying her nose as the excuse for the blood in the fridge.. Plus the mother was screwing her own brother. I don't recall ever bloodying my son's nose. Reddened his rear end a couple times.

.

Yep, normal people wait two days to report a young child missing and wash their home down with petrol in the meantime.

 

In a 20 year period, there has nly ever been one occasion where drops of my blood were about my house. Its was a nasty puncture wound I got during an accident.

Similarly, I dont think the police would, at any given time, find droplets of your daughters blood about her house.

And even on hose rare occasions when they would, I doubt the plice would discover those drops in the fridge !

If you ever take up the lawyer business jon let me know. I want you to defend me if I ever go to court !!!!!!

 

I really wasn't trying to get all into the aspects of that case and whether or not she was really guilty. The point of mentioning it was to show the difference between Portuguese law enforcement techniques and American techniques. Imagine the reaction if Patsy Ramsey emerged from the Boulder Colorado police station looking like that.

If the law enforcement agency and the court system is not comprised of white folk, than it is not to be trusted. N*ggers can't create a righteous system of justice. Dispute that? Prove me wrong. Find me some n*gger run countries that aren't f*cked up. And yes, by "n*gger" I mean any country whose predominant demographic within the government is not Caucasian/Asian. In n*gger countries they beat your ass and run roughshod over your ass, guilty or not.

First off Sheik, I don't know if you ever had kids, but they get hurt ALOT. Skinned knees, cuts and the like. One could easily transfer minuscule amounts of blood into a freezer by reaching in to get ice for your child's injury.

Secondly, I am not talking about obvious visible drops of blood. I am speaking about minute, minuscule droplets and residuals. The variety that can only be found with luminescent light and a chemical reagent. I guarantee in any household of any missing child, the police could find blood traces and DNA all over the place.

She was a "General Practitioner". I derived the fact that she handles corpses from the below article. How much validity there is too it, I have no idea.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/11/wmaddy411.xml

 

Now you put it like that I see your point.

The press of course leave things like this unsaid. Its much more titilating to lets peoples imaginations as well as paper sales run riot.

These are the ones we go to to get our drug prescriptions renewed, our blood pressure checked and our ears peered into. She meets cadavers, like I'm sick of bumping into Superman

 

Ya that's what I thought. Ear, nose and throat doctors I thought, but the article from a reliable source worded it as if she handles cadavers. I read this from a few other sources but none of them were specific. Maybe she does some sort of training for med students or.........?

 

Maybe she's a really, really bad GP and has a lot of patients die in her officie?

 

I had a thought today while I was reading through the newpaper and saw yet ANOTHER story about this child. What if this is all one HUGE hoax? What if the parents have been paid to see if they can get a story in the news every day for a whole year?

Something stinks about this case.

 

hehehehe......or maybe she KILLS THEM!!!!!

The investigation is what reeks. They had the cleaning staff clean the room long before DNA was searched for. HUNDREDS of people trampled in and out of the room. The only "evidence" was a supposed hit by a cadaver dog in the rental car that had been in service for quite some time, driven by hundreds of people before the McCann's. The hotel employees weren't interviewed for over 60 hours after Maddy was reported missing.

What stinks is the investigation. How in the world anyone could even whisper that the McCann's are "obviously" guilty under such circumstance, I have no f*cking clue.

 

The McCann's are so paranoid of fire that they habitually leave their backdoor unlocked. What did they think Maddy and her siblings would have done if there had been a fire?

 

Again, this is the kind of sh*t that says nothing about the McCann's guilt in the childs supposed death.

 

ThaT ALONG WITH THE EXPERT OPINION ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF AN INTRUDER THROUGH THE WINDOW SAYS QUITE A BIT. tHESE ARE TWO PROFESSIONALS WHO WHILE AFRAID OF FIRE THEMSELVES HAVE NO PROBLEMS LEAVING THEIR CHILDREN. iT MAKES NO RATIONAL SENSE. tHEY ARE GUILTY AS HELL. ****in' caps lock.

 

So.......they did a "Pretty good job" but they didn't seal the crime scene (AT ALL) and they allowed a cleaning lady to spray cleaning agents all over the room before it was tested for DNA? Oh...and they didn't interview any of the people in the building from which Maddy was taken for almost 3 days. GREAT JOB!


Right.

Most of the assessments I have heard toward the Portuguese police investigation was along the lines of "One of the worst crime scene investigations I have ever heard of".

Should she have assumed the child just disappeared into thin air? Also, this is the sort of anecdotal nonsense that sensationalist magazines just love. MY assumption, anyones assumption, would have been to think the child had been taken.

How many times has this biased idiot had his child stolen?

 

Professor Barclay pointed out the major mistake the police made and that was not harshly interrogating the perpetrators of the crime, the McCanns. It is quite clear the probability of an intruder was very low, That leaves the McCann's. Like the Boulder, Colorado police force in another celebrated case the mistake was to let wealthy parents off easy.

Guilty as hell.

 

In America and the UK we require "evidence" to prosecute people. We don't just sit them down, handcuffed to a chair and beat their ass black and blue until they confess.

If I am ever on trial, I sure hope I don't see you on the jury.

Too much reasonable doubt in this case.

It's crap like this that causes me to call for a moratorium on the death penalty until they figure out why our juries are so simple minded and prone to Soap opera forensics.