..but if you are brainwashed you will not care. http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/ground_zero_emt_told_build_7_was_to_be_pulled.htm
What is more disturbing is that building #6 and #8 are also gone. Demolished, dismanteled, removed, kerput! What is this world coming to anyway?
Infowars, huh? A leader in reputable and reliable reporting? Let's see... how does that work? Hello, I was at ground zero. For many reasons that I wish not to go into I shall prefer to remain anonymous. You may call me Mike,33,PA. What I witnessed there will make your blood run cold. I learned that it was not Islamic terrorists but rather a group of radical anti-conservatives that were responsible for the events of September 11. I saw them. I heard them. They were dancing around and laughing, congratulating each other and marveling at the sheer genius of their leader... a man they refered to as Danr. I heard them speak of how it was the first step in the attempt to sabotage the Bush administration by first causing a catastrophe and then by building a great conspiracy theory around it.... blah, blah... yadda yadda. You heard it here on the internet, so it must be true. Now go my little blogger geeks and spread the word so that all will know the ugly truth. After all, I am Mike,33,PA so you must know that all you are reading is absolutely credible. That's about how it all works, right?
There is enough doubt, even within the scientific community, to make this the subject of further investigation. But the topic seems to be taboo. As things stand, the official version has to be accepted as being probably true but never confirmed.
There are alot of suspicious things surrounding the events of 9/11. And I haven't researched it on-line at all.
You guys not watch "Independence Day" movie It beings from outer space destroy Twin Towers. They make space ships to look of aircrafts flying into buildings. At same time they abduct Danr and brainwashed him to believe of all these conspiracies about G W Bush etc. Sorry - secret out now:kewl:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5101488991907845273&q=building 7 collapse&hl=en it is pretty obvious that this building (the one that was NOT hit by a plane) was demo'ed look at how far it is from the ones that got hit (one and two got hit):
I don't accept pictures of the falling of the building as proof of demolition. A structure that size and shape made of steel and concrete would most likely not topple if its integrity were compromised. The sheer weight of the materials used to build it would cause it collapse in on itself as the steel bent like you see here. Now, can you show me anything that shows the flashes or sounds of the detonation of charges that supposedly brought this building down?
Was Clinton behind the attempt in 93 or did GW Jr., plot that attack from the Texas Rangers owners box in Arlington?
the owner of the building admits it was pulled http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=building 7 silverstein
http://www.infowars.com/articles/se..._downed_more_ground_zero_heroes_on_record.htm looks like a lot of people are coming out about how building 7 was pulled, it is out now
The first WTC attack was in 1993, and the second in 2001. Nope, totally different subjects, no relation at all. Or it could have been the gay community.
Dan - it seems a bit ironic that you are using the word "brainwashed" I have always felt that this conspiracy lacked the equivalent of area 51's Bob Lazar. It seems that that problem has now been solved. Here is my problem with your scenario. I have seen documentaries showing what is involved with explosive demolitions . Before demolition a team of experts spends weeks preparing a building in which the interior has been gutted and some of the structural support has been weakened.How can this be done in an occupied building without all of the tennants being aware of it? Where do you stand on some of the other biggies - Roswell,the JFK assasination,Princess Di or the moon landings. Bill
I for one think there no conspiracy when it comes to Princess Di and the moon landings. Maybe on Roswell. And definately on JFK. Look at the evidence. I think there is no way Oswald did it, but if he did it is certain he wasn't the only gunmen. And as for 9/11, we're not being told the whole story, not even close.
I think our dear friends the Saudis decided to slap George on the wrist by allowing it to happen because he wasn't doing a thing about the Palistinian issue. There is no way a group of mostly Saudis could pull something like that off without the knowledge of the Saudi government in a society as closed and tightly controlled as theirs. We paid for Bush's come-uppin's on the world stage with the blood of 3000 plus of our citizens. Did you notice we got the heck out of Saudi Arabia shortly after 9/11. Do you think he'd ever admit to this nor would the Saudis? That is about as much as our government had to do with the event and it was all indirect participation. Heck, Clinton may even have known what the Saudis would resort to if not appeased and just didn't tell Bush. Bottom line, we are attacked with no chance of retailation for those genuinely responsible.