Liberal Talk Show Host Ed Schultz Suspended Over Disparaging Remarks

You have no proof, so you refuse to answer. If that makes you feel good, so be it.

They were killed by land sharks. What else?

 

That is what makes it an assertion clown. Where is your proof that the Libyans in your photos were killed by NATO attacks?

No proof so you refuse to answer huh?

 

I made an assertion and showed photos. You can believe it or not - it's up to you. You made an assertion and have provided no proof whatsoever. Go figure.

 

Those photos are not proof, they are racist propaganda.

 

..... still waiting for proof of your assertion ..... Go ahead and post something.. ANYTHING! Let us decide!

 

I didn't expect you to understand it, I expected you to continue to deny it. I'm right again... (*laughs) *for Lehigh, the homophobe

Oh? Nothing at all? I believe your name is Paul (though I may be mistaken). You have a twin brother. You love toned coins. You're homophobic. (*laughs) ...there's more, but I think I've made my point... you are wrong, I am right ...again... (*laughs)

True to a point, but to ignore what I can deduce from your posts, both here and on other sites, is wrong... again... (*laughs)

Are you hitting on me? Is that a sexual thing? Not interested... (*laughs)

You mean "fall into your brilliant trap"? Maybe not, in my defense, "I do what I want" (your quote) ...(*laughs)

Ask your dad, I'm sure he'll have all the right answers for ya... (*laughs)

 

Aaaaaaaaaaaaand.. still waiting.......

View attachment 192

 

Well, I'm tired of waiting.. Maybe here's proof:

NATO: Libya Rebel Deaths Don't Require Apology

Oh, no... that's just a story about NATO killing rebels.

Maybe this is the proof you've been looking for:

NATO discusses ground operation, Libya promises hell | The Global Realm

WAIT! That's not it, either... that's just a story about NATO discussing a ground operation and Libya promising "hell".

AHA! I think I found it:

Inside the art deco war room for Nato on Libya - Telegraph

NO... sorry, that's just a story about NATO's Art Deco room in Italy and about NATO losing its momentum...

HMMMMMM.. I can't seem to find anything to back up your claims. Do you mind trying?

 

A whole 5 minutes you waited?! Such an angry right winger. You are a credit to the democratic party. Thank you for your contribution.

 

Lehigh sure enjoys being an instigator... (*laughs)

...a big weakness on a forum like this... (*laughs)

..."no way would Moen have bit that hook"...(*laughs)...

 

Don't start cryin about nelly.

 

Yeah, he is dead. I guess you can add that to the trivial list of stuff you know about me. Guess your ready to write my biography at this point huh?

Such a nelly clown you are! Guess you are feeling better, the (laughs) have returned.

 

My assertion was that the number of deaths caused by the NATO attacks was a small percentage of the total killed in the war. You have linked articles that speak of deaths caused by NATO, but I have yet to see a number. From what you have shown, the number is less than 100. You want proof, here ya go clown.

Deaths overall

The total number of people killed includes protesters, armed belligerents, and captives executed:
Source Libyan casualties Time period
World Health Organization 2,000 killed[56] February 15 - March 2, 2011
International Federation for Human Rights 3,000 killed[2] February 15 - March 5, 2011
Libyan League for Human Rights 6,000 killed[2] February 15 - March 5, 2011
National Transitional Council 10,000 killed[57] February 15 - April 12, 2011

Casualties of the 2011 Libyan civil war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would say that 100 out of 10,000 is a small percentage. Checkmate!

 

...be wary of yourself...

(laughs)

 

Long as the showers are separate.

 

We have the capability to exterminate a country like Libya without ever losing a single soldier, using a single war plane, tank or war ship and without putting a single boot on the ground. But, it is good to know that we can do that without being at war. It could just be a kinetic nuclear action.

 

Damn, you go to it first.

 

lmao

 

Oh no. No sir. It is a war. Not a conflict or a Nato action or a skirmish. Its a war according to some people here. Anything having to do with military action is a war. Havent you been reading?

 

This is from the same Wikipedia entry you quoted, Ding-Dong:

Deaths caused by Coalition forces

The Libyan official sources claimed that at least between 64 and 90 people were killed during the bombardments on the first two days of the U.N. intervention and another 150 had been wounded.[22] The Vatican news agency confirmed that in Tripoli alone, at least 40 civilians died as a result of the bombing campaign.[23] According to the Libyan Health office, the airstrikes killed 718 civilians and wounded 4,067, 433 seriously, by May 26.[24]
On April 1, NATO airstrikes killed 14 rebel fighters and wounded seven more on the frontline at Brega.[25]
On April 7, news reports surfaced that NATO bombers killed 10-13 rebels and wounded 14-22 near the eastern oil town of Brega.[26]
On April 27, at least one NATO warplane attacked the Libyan rebel forces position near the besieged city of Misrata, killing 12 fighters and wounding five others.[27]


Did you read that? Up to 90 people were killed during the first two days alone!!! And 718 civilians have been killed (assuming that includes Ghaddafi's infant grandchildren). I can see that you put little value on human life. NATO forces have even killed many of the people they're trying to help (the rebels)!