Liberal Talk Show Host Ed Schultz Suspended Over Disparaging Remarks

Spelling mistakes are usually an error of attention and have very little to do with intelligence. You however are a complete and total idiot. Moen chews you up on a regular basis and he is also a dumbass.

You want proof that you are an idiot. Read your sigline clowntard!

 

Then maybe you have Attention Deficit Disorder. If so, there are medications that can help you. I suggest you contact a physician.

Did you mean to say "lack of intelligence" instead? Regardless, in your case the word "intelligence" should not even be in your vocabulary.

I think you may also have anger management issues. Mention that to the doctor, also.

I'm beginning to have sympathy for you. All these things wrong and now you've revealed that you have a reading comprehension problem. Oh wait, you probably didn't understand that. Let me make it simpler for you: YOO KAN NOT REED.

No comment.

BARACK OBAMA - WARMONGER! OK... what about it? Do you consider me an idiot because I say he's a warmonger? Do you even know what a warmonger is? Also, please explain what a clowntard is? I've never heard the word and I can't find it in the dictionary. Did you just take two words (clown and custard) and contract them together? Does it have something to do with clowns (jovial, fun-loving people) and custard (a delicious pie)? Or is the second word "mustard"? Or "leotard"? Possibly "petard"? Could it be "unitard"? Whatever it is, you don't make yourself very clear which is comparable with all your posts on this forum.

I haven't made up words like that since I was in elementary school. It's kind of fun, though. Here, let me see if I can make up a word that fits you... Colorectalpolypjerk. Yeah, that's a good one for starters.

 

And he is sitting someplace in northern Minnesota angling for walleye. I think we've been played. LOL!!

 

Anyway, back to the topic. My feeling is that I will not accept criticism from the Right until the Right reins in their own hate merchants and holds them accountable for the things that they say. I can accept the criticisms from the Left of Ed Schultz because it is widely accepted on the Left that this kind of language is not tolerated.

On the Right, as I have said before, it is not only acceptable but when it is used, it is only the Left that objects to it, never the Right itself. For instance, what were the consequences when Glenn Beck called a sitting U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu a prostitute twice. NONE! He didn't apologize, he wasn’t called out by the Right, and he did it on Fox "News". Seriously, there is no equivalency when one side accepts the language so openly and the other side condemns it so consistently.

People make mistakes and I can forgive any of them. But when you not only don’t ask for forgiveness but continue exhibit the same behaviors, any condemnation you receive is completely justified in my opinion. Ed Schultz made a mistake and he is atoning for it. Glenn Beck is still preaching hatred.

 

And then there is this one; "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. " I wonder what happened to Mr. Kanjorski. Someday you will figure out this is not a left/right issue, but a people issue.

 

and again...

People make mistakes and I can forgive any of them. But when you not only don’t ask for forgiveness but continue exhibit the same behaviors, any condemnation you receive is completely justified in my opinion. Ed Schultz made a mistake and he is atoning for it. Glenn Beck is still preaching hatred.

 

He said that not long before an election. He lost. lol

 

And Mr. Kanjorski made a mistake (st least I think it was a mistake) and he has not even bothered to atone for it.

Then there is "They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them". Or Tea Party is “astroturf”. Or "The Republican V.P. nom would be "gang-raped by my big black brothers" if she enters Manhattan". Or "Gabrielle Giffords’ blood is on Sarah Palin’s hands".

Real right wing hate speech, right?

 

The interesting thing about this comment, as wrong as it was, I can understand the outrage behind it. He made the comment about Rick Scott who is the current Republican Governor of Florida and a former health care executive that worked for a company that defrauded Medicare and Medicaid out of billions of dollars and was fined 1.7 billion dollars. After defrauding the tax payers out of so much money, I can understand why some people might think he should be shot. But of course, doing so makes him a perfect Republican candidate for Governor. Not only do they want to kill Medicare, they’d like to rob the bank as it goes down.

 

My guess is that Schultz will fade back into nothingness the same as Keith Olberman...there just isn't an audience (or market) for these kind of bitter, petty ideologues.

 

He was a Republican until 2000. I suppose it takes a while for the bitterness to completely fade.

 

What's this guy's name again?

 

Based on the tone of your post I have some advice for you.

I do consider you an idiot for calling Obama a warmonger. Please name a war that Obama has started? When you can't, you will realize that you are an idiot and that Obama is not a warmonger.

 

Good God Almighty, man!!!!! Do you even read the news? Don't you realize that Obama has dropped Tomahawk missiles on Libya and sent armed predator drones to bomb them? You're even dumber than I initially thought.

 

We are not at war with Libya. That attack was a humanitarian mission to stop Khaddaffi from slaughtering his own people and was conducted by a UN coalition after obtaining approval for such action by the UN Security Council. Is your whole case for BO being a warmonger based on Libya? If it is, you have once again expertly made an ass of yourself.

I really can't stand most of Moen's political views and I think he is one of the most partisan people in this country. However, you are 100 times worse than he is. It is disingenuous republicans like yourself who give radical liberals like Moen the ammunition that they need to continue to spread their venomous talk. Your constant sophomoric attempts to spin the truth are easily exposed and weaken the conservative political viewpoint. Obama has done plenty in his first term that deserves criticism. Warmongering is not one them. In fact, on a scale of 1 to 10, I rate his handling of the Libya situation at an 8. IMO, it is probably his second biggest foreign policy success behing killing Bin Laden.

I understand that standing up and saying that your political opponent achieved any measure of success is a bad political move. But if you can't admit that he did something right, then shut the hell up and don't say anything at all. When you criticize your opponents successes, all you do is expose your own incompetence and partisanship, thereby hurting your own cause. Stop being a dufus in the Republican party and remove that sig line. All you are doing is bolstering the Democrats with your lunacy.

And if you want proof that I am right, watch Moen click the "LIKE" button on this post after he reads it.

 

Thats pretty solid Lehigh

 

I'll never admit that invading Libya was the right thing to do. Why? Because Libya didn't attack us. Yeah, yeah, you might say, "What about the Lockerbie bombing"? Sorry, but that's not Obama's reason for attacking Libya. Obama's stated reason for bombing Libya was for "humanitarian reasons". It doesn't make any sense to kill people if your goal is for "humanitarian reasons", does it? Especially the killing of little children who have been victims of Obama's war machine. I really don't give a damn whether Obama received UN permission or not to bomb Libya. He didn't have to do it and shouldn't have done it at all. The blood of many Libyans is on Obama's hands.

 

I will give the President tons of credit for bin Laden. Libya? None at all. We shouldn't have been involved any more than we should get involved in the rest of the countries over there in these 'revolutions'.

Libya is a war. It is not a humanitarian mission. We are trying to eliminate a military force and depose a leader. I can understand the misguided intentions behind it but do not support us participating in a war over it.

 

I don't measure the success of my opponents in the number of bodies they bury. Try telling the Libyans it's not a "war":

View attachment 182
Libyans burying their relatives in mass graves, who are civilians killed in Obama led bombings View attachment 183
Libyan rebel walks past dead bodies of a member of Moammer Khaddafi forces

 

View attachment 186
A Libyan rebel checks the dead body of a member of Moammer Khaddafi forces in al-Wayfiyah