I actually do. To pick a few of your examples to answer to 1. Real Estate- Check what is zoned in any area that I’m looking to buy in. Check the height above sea level. Check for liens. Do my own inspection with my equipment along with the home inspector especially in an area I don’t have my guy, (They get hired or referred by real estate agents so they not impartial or on your side if they want continued business from agents- house has to pass to sell). Check contractors licenses- you be amazed how many have businesses cards listing a license and license number on truck but either expired or nonexistent. Etc.etc. And real estate is a side business for me.
And a really big thing is to check what’s in what you putting inside yourself or your children. Thimersosal is Mercury. Why take a vaccine shot from one company that uses it to extend shelf life whereas another pharmaceutical company does not use it. As shown below:
I grew up poor in a housing project in Brooklyn that at the time was the murder capital of the nation. I do not trust easily and if you realize that humans are born predators, look at your teeth, then you realize for some people “dog eat dog” is normal for them. And from my educational side as Adam Smith stated, “Let the buyer beware”.
There’s no “Wow” button for me to select, so I’m opting for comment.. WOW! I’d have NEVER ever thought to question any of these. Yikes! I’ll keep on just saying no to these vaccines they always suggest and offer. I hope I remember this list you’ve posted.
I thought you relied on science. Flu shots are 40% to 60% effective at best. Now if I remember correctly, you adamantly support abortion because birth control is a lowly 99% effective.
I was pointing out to look at what is in the vaccine shot before taking it for some pharmaceutical companies have cleaner vaccines then others
The idea that it's "cleaner" for not containing this one ingredient is false though. Even if you aren't an anti-vaxxer, fear mongering over thimersosal is their bread and butter.
From what I've read, there is no proof that thimerosal is safe . . . merely the suggestion that it is not unsafe. Excerpted from Wikipedia, General toxicity Thiomersal is very toxic by inhalation, ingestion, and in contact with skin (EC hazard symbol T+), with a danger of cumulative effects. It is also very toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long-term adverse effects in aquatic environments (EC hazard symbol N).[20] In the body, it is metabolized or degraded to ethylmercury (C2H5Hg+) and thiosalicylate.[14] Cases have been reported of severe mercury poisoning by accidental exposure or attempted suicide, with some fatalities.[21] Animal experiments suggest that thiomersal rapidly dissociates to release ethylmercury after injection; that mercury's disposition patterns are similar to those after exposure to equivalent doses of ethylmercury chloride; and that the central nervous system and the kidneys are targets. Loss of motor coordination is a common sign. Similar signs and symptoms have been observed in accidental human poisonings. The mechanisms of toxic action are unknown.[21] Fecal excretion accounts for most of the elimination from the body. Ethylmercury clears from blood with a half-life of about 18 days in adults by breakdown into other chemicals, including inorganic mercury.[22] Ethylmercury is eliminated from the brain in about 14 days in infant monkeys.[citation needed] Risk assessment for effects on the nervous system have been made by extrapolating from dose-response relationships for methylmercury.[23] Methylmercury and ethylmercury distribute to all body tissues, crossing the blood–brain barrier and the placental barrier, and ethylmercury also moves freely throughout the body.[24] Concerns based on extrapolations from methylmercury caused thiomersal to be removed from U.S. childhood vaccines, starting in 1999. Later it was reported that ethylmercury is eliminated from the body and the brain significantly faster than methylmercury, so the late-1990s risk assessments turned out to be overly conservative.[23] Though inorganic mercury metabolized from ethylmercury has a much longer half-life in the brain, at least 120 days, it appears to be much less toxic than the inorganic mercury produced from mercury vapor, for reasons not yet understood.[23] I am not one to throw caution to the wind and, mindful of the fact that alternate vaccines are available for influenza, would be more trusting of those until the scientific community does a better job of vetting thimerosal.
You are simply spouting an opposite view agenda. let me help- ALL routine vaccines for 6yr. old and younger children in the U.S. are available without the derivative. And, amazingly, also available for adolescents and adults!! Whodathunk? ALL ARE APPROVED AND REIMBURSIBLE BY CMMS. As Cms goes so do all HEALTH INSURANCE Providers. The reason is simple...the advent of single dose pharma has decreased the need for long term storage and it is CHEAPER for Pharma AND THE CONSUMER. Let me give a simple (maybe to simple for some): Patient presents with Stage 4 Open Angle Glaucoma- End Stage. All treatment to date does not reduce OP results that have been consistently between 24-30 X4years. Nerve damage is end stage. Cosopt PF is substituted for the previous treatment protocol (PF = Preservative Free) . OP results 16-19 X 2 years-3 months. Nerve damage stable. Sensitivity testing is performed. Results: ALL PREVIOUS TREATMENT MODALITIES INCLUDED THIOMERSAL MERTHIOLATE DERIVITIVE. Patent testing exhibits sensitivity to ORGANOMERCURIAL DERIVITIVES. Pharma initiates review protocol blahblahblah. Results: 12-16% of population has sensitivity to Preservative containing treatment modalities for vaccines containing Preservatives. Sensitivity is markedly reduced when PF vaccines are introduced. And here we are....good for Pharma because reduced manufacturing costs (and shielding from Liability BTW), good for Patient because cost is covered either way, and good for the Physician because Patients with previous sensitivity to any type of vaccines now have a safe alternative, and good for the PBMs and Pharmacies since it is now not necessary to have excess preservative containing inventory. Yep, you were and are spouting opposite view agenda, and what is disappointing is you are supposedly involved in the field of human health science, and do not know what the hell you are talking about, because if you did, you would not be using the ATTICA ATTICA anti- vaxxer schtick as your first choice of response, given your celebrated fair and impartial non-political treatment of any given subject (that is satire, in case it is not obvious). Come home, child, and be educated by the unwashed of this Federal Republic. PS: I know stuff...and if I don't, I don't go to WIKI to find out. So.....
Take i So you trust an industry that makes it impossible to sue for vaccination shots as long as they label them correctly. And then given even more protection from being sued with laws added to the Patriot Act? You can look that up if you want.
At one time they were still brought to court for fraud etc. but they seem to have the press under control now so not much chance that will happen again.
Hi LucyRay. Wikipedia is for a quick look up but I would suggest to cross reference any shot. Centers for Disease and Control does have information as well. Along with drug inserts.