It Has Begun

We shall see

 

Well that's rather petty. Do you really believe you are appointed to judge how a man spends his own money?.... I rather think you have bought so deeply into the propaganda that you will parrot whatever they tell you to say or think. I really thought you were smarter than that.

 

The premise of the original post wasn't that I personally believed anything, but rather to point out the double standard. I'm guessing you didn't personally have a problem with Obama's tan suit, yet that became a "scandal" of his.

 

You are correct. It was so trivial that I didn't help give it any traction at the time. I was rather embarrassed that it was allowed traction by some conservative outlets. I would hardly call a poor fashion choice a scandal and for all the valid reasons I did not support Obama, this was certainly not one of them...... If a man wants to guild the highest office in our land, erect flagpoles and build grand ballrooms all on his dime, how could that be anything other than generous?.... He gets lambasted for his success, his skin color his weight..... Yet here we have a man that has effectively ended what is it four armed conflicts now? A man that has spent more of his personal money to rise the character and opulence of our highest office, one that every future POTUS will be the benefactor of.... And yet he is still villainized by every liberal mouthpiece out there and all their parrots to boot...... Dang man. Makes a guy wonder what sort of liberal press Christ would get if he walked the earth in 2025.

 

The liberals would say “What took him so long to rise from the tomb? Three days? What took him so long”? Or “He only raised one man from the dead? Geez my Uncle Joe is still dead, why doesn’t he raise him”? Or “He made the blind man see, but he didn’t give the man healthcare for the rest of his life!”

Liberals always see the worst in anything. That’s why I don’t hang around with them. Not only are they dumb, but they are boring and depressing.

 

Anyone want to read the tea leaves from yesterdays Trump-Putin meeting. I'm not used to having to wonder whats behind the curtain.

 

I think it’s a trap. I think, in order to save the ailing Chinese economy, Xi wants all out war without it looking like he started it, and is egging Putin on to draw an ultimatum out of Trump

 

Hey, BRANCO, Democrats are for limited government, too . . . ​

​

. . . limited to Democrats in government.​

.​

 

Can you even imagine if Biden or Obama threatened Fox like this?

 

Ha. There was seldom a Biden speech where scourging Fox wasn’t his favorite applause line. Frankly I am in favor of all current news outlets to be forced to change their heading to opinion rather than news. There are no major neutral news reporting agencies and I give them all a fair listen. Fox truly is the closest to being neutral…. But these days being neutral is as dangerous to the left as being conservative. You tell me which is more dangerous…. Maddow or Hannity. And be fair in your judgment.

 

They're both brain rotting, I wouldn't recommend watching either show.

 

Silly . . . You should watch both. Alternating between extremes teaches one to think more critically about the specific words chosen by both, and why.

 

False dichotomy. The scale isn't linear, you're being fed two lines that aren't necessarily the only options but are being portrayed that way. Why do you think that is?

 

So why do you believe this narrative? This is a right vs left opinion news option of highly rated competitive individuals by overall viewership. Is one more weighted?
So if you have a more trusted source, please share.

 

What sort of idiot do you suppose I am? One who believes that, on every commonly-covered subject, either of the two sides must necessarily be right?

I wrote what I did for a very specific reason. Do you really not know what that reason is?

 

I don't think you're an idiot at all, but I think you're doing yourself no favors by watching Hannity or Maddow.