Nice comeback after I proved that they do! Short and sweet. Were you late for clown practice or something?
I never claimed he did or didn't "lead the attack". I don't actually know for sure since the President and his band of thugs at the time were incapable of stating anything that wasn't a lie. He's certainly no more or less culpable than President Cheney and his monkey assistant. I realize we prosecute with or without evidence these day, but all I am basically saying is that the FBI doesn't list 911 as one of the crimes that he's wanted for. I've stated many times that I do not know all the particulars of 911...I DO know that Georgey, The Dick Cheney, Rummy, and all the rest are complete utter liars and war criminals such that everything they claim is subject to further review for foul play (of which they are the modern day masters).
No Spooky...I won't because I do not know for sure one way or the other since the Bushies were so tight with the Bin Ladens in the first place and Georgey was so corrupt to begin with.
Oh my clown, did you forget how to read? Here is the applicable sentence in the sheet. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. Are you upset that they didn't list 9/11 specifically? If they found him and took him into custody, how many of the questions would be about 9/11 as opposed to the say, the embassy bombing in Tanzania? Or maybe the FBI told you they don't suspect Bin Laden for 9/11 when they told you to post your convincing retraction of your truther conspiracy on this forum!
Well it just seems to me, with all of the official confirmations that Osama did it (that they figured out almost immediately that day...the same day the military establishment fell on it's face when boxcutters wreaked havoc on our country. I mean...all that obvious proof, it shoulda been elementary that the FBI would list his 911 crime....all that evidence and all. I do understand though. They probably didn't want to attract attention to the administration. Somebody involved mighta squawked.
YES to letting them go ahead with the COMMUNITY CENTER near ground zero. What is being proposed is NOT exclusively a terrorist harbouring, extremist Mosque that is being built. It is a community center, learning center, in addition to having a mosque inside. If you are condemning the mosque, you are condemning the help and support that this will bring to NYC. This is not an insult to the lives lost in 9/11 as much as it would be an affirmation of the 'religious freedom' that is guaranteed to ALL americans in your constitution.
Ah so it is not exclusivly a Terrorist hangout, just some of the time then LOL The argument has nothing to do with freedom of worship it has everything to do with building a mosque in such a sensative area, the attack on the Twin towers (and many others) was carried out by Muslims unfortunatly it taints the idea of such a building. Why not simply build a community center there without the mosque? or have a multi denomination place of worship. I know that if it was reveled that a mosque was to be erected in Tavistock Square (London) I would be against that but would have no objection to one been opend in the street that I live in
