Is Hillary Too Old (Or Brain Damaged) To Run For President?

Yes, Hillary is too old but it’s the brain damage that should concern you

By: DrJohn​

At National Journal Charlie Cook suggested that Hillary Clinton might be too old to run for President.

The question remains: Is Hillary Clinton really a 100 percent lock to run? I think it is a pretty good bet, maybe 70 percent chance or so; but that also means there is an approximately 30 percent chance that she doesn’t throw her hat in the ring. The current political environment certainly argues on behalf of a Clinton run, and it would be very difficult—but not impossible—for anyone to beat her for the nomination. However, these choices can never be considered 100 percent political decisions. Clinton turns 67 this October. At that age, she will likely be making her candidacy decision, and if nominated Clinton would turn 69 two weeks before the 2016 general election, notably the same age Ronald Reagan was when he was first elected in 1980. The choice to run for president is effectively a nine-year commitment: one year to run, another four years if she wins a first term—finishing up that term at age 73—and then, assuming she runs for reelection and wins, serving four more years to end a second term at 77 years of age. None of this is to say that the age issue could successfully be used against her. After all, Reagan won the presidency at the same age. But how many 67-year-olds make nine-year commitments, and what concerns have to be addressed if they do?

​

Without a doubt liberals will get all up in arms about this suggestion, but let’s crank up the wayback machine.

In 1984 George Ball of the NY Times claimed that Ronald Reagan was too old to run for President.

In 1980, the pundits said Ronald Reagan was too old and too physically vulnerable to be President. Four years and one assassination attempt later, George Ball again tells us that President Reagan is too old to be re- elected (Op-Ed June 24). In addition to grimly warning us of actuarial probabilities, Mr. Ball speaks of the senility and incapacity that may accompany the aging process.
​

Back in 2008, Anna Quindlen thought John McCain was too old:

Here’s my unscientific theory about the presidency: it ages a person in dog years. Each year in office is roughly equivalent to seven years in the life of an ordinary citizen. I base this on before-and-after photographs of the occupants of the Oval Office, who frequently look as though they’ve spent their time in captivity, being beaten with sticks. Which may help explain why 71-year-old John McCain, who actually has been beaten in captivity, may think that the fact that he would be the oldest person ever to enter the job is immaterial. In this, alas, he is mistaken.
​

It’s going to be entertaining watching her choke on those words.

And the ever-daft Joan Walsh proved she learns nothing from history:

While I don’t think this is true for Corn, there’s no doubt Clinton’s age will push more people’s buttons than if she were a man. Back in 2007, after Matt Drudge ran an AP photo of a tired-looking Clinton, Rush Limbaugh asked his listeners, “Will this country want to actually watch a woman get older before their eyes on a daily basis?” She had just turned 60. Expect more of the same, much more, from sexists on the right should Clinton decide to run. Democrats don’t have to support Clinton, but they might avoid sharpening the weapons right-wingers will use against her.
​

Jim Geraghty recently observed Hillary’s recent haggard appearance



As an aside, there’s a trove of stuff to use against Hillary here thanks to Common Dreams, not the least of which is this quote from Jane Fonda:

Jane Fonda says that Hillary is a “ventriloquist for the patriarchy with a skirt and a vagina. It may be that a feminist, progressive man would do better in the White House.”
​

And Anna Quindlen again:

“The truth is that Senator Clinton has a woman problem,” said Anna Quindlen, a Newsweek columnist. “The fantasy was that the first woman President would be someone who would turn the whole lousy system inside out and upside down. Instead the first significant woman contender is someone who seems to have the system down to a fine art.”
​

Now back to Charlie Cook for why she shouldn’t run at all:

According to The Atlantic, during her tenure as secretary of State, Clinton traveled for 401 days to 112 countries, totaling 956,733 miles, a distance equal to more than 38 times around the globe; wags have taken to calling it “odometer diplomacy.” But also worth noting is how in Secretary Clinton’s last year at her post, particularly the last few months at the State Department, the position clearly took a toll on her health; she experienced an episode of fainting or passing out, and suffered a head injury. None of this necessarily is to argue against her running, but she would be undertaking something that, as she well knows, is considerably more physically demanding even than her previous position, and at an older age. This is not necessarily an end-all-be-all argument that she should or would not run, simply that she likely would have to think long and hard as to whether she is physically up to the rigors of running and serving in office. Having run for president once before, and enduring two presidential campaigns and terms as a spouse, no one understands more clearly than Hillary does what the position demands. Do all of the people who say that she absolutely will run know and appreciate this as much as she obviously does?
​

Cook is not a doctor, and he sells the injury short.

Head injury? Traumatic brain injury is what Clinton suffered and a significant one at that. Puffington Host did its best to distract everyone from the severity of the injury, calling it a “mild concussion.” It’s considerably more than that. Mild concussions do not leave one with severe and lasting visual disturbances. A mild concussion is one in which there is no loss of consciousness and symptoms do not last more than 15 minutes. Clinton’s injury is far past that.

A brain injury lawyer warned against trivializing Clinton’s brain injury:

Michael V. Kaplen, a leading New York brain injury attorney and immediate past president of the Brain Injury Association of New York, today voiced his distress of politicians and certain segments of the news media seeing to trivialize the effects of the concussion sustained by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

According to Kaplen, who serves as Chair of the New York State Traumatic Brain Injury Services Coordinating Council and served as Chair of the American Association of Justice, Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, “All concussions are brain injuries and must be taken seriously. You can never minimize a concussion and anyone who has ever had to live with the effects of a concussion understands the seriousness of this condition and the need for rest.”

Brain Injury attorney Kaplen, a partner in the New York personal injury law firm
De Caro & Kaplen, has received numerous complaints from individuals and their families who continue to suffer the effects of concussions.

​

 

(continued)

A Grade 3 concussion involves the loss of consciousness. We do not yet have all the details of the injury but were she to run for office, disclosure would be very important. First details of Clinton’s fall were minimal and dismissive. Later it was disclosed that Clinton had developed a blood clot in her brain. The clot was attributed to “dehydration” but transverse sinus thrombosis consequent to dehydration is seen more commonly in children and infants and not adults. This was added, cryptically:

A transverse sinus thrombosis is a clot arising in one of the major veins that drains the brain. It is an uncommon but serious disorder. According to Greenwald, the clot was most likely caused by dehydration brought on by the flu, perhaps exacerbated by a concussion she recently suffered.​

​

The fall most likely caused the clot.

This was a far more serious injury than has been acknowledged thus far. Clinton also suffers from a long term visual deficit consequent to the fall. That’s why she is wearing those Fresnel-lens glasses. She has double vision.



There is still more to consider. Traumatic brain injuries can lead to early onset of dementia

Patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI) had over twice the risk of developing dementia within seven years after diagnosis compared to those without TBI, in a study of more than 280,000 older veterans conducted by researchers at the San Francisco VA Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco.​

​

or even Alzheimer’s.

A study, performed in mice and utilizing post-mortem samples of brains from patients with Alzheimer’s disease, found that a single event of a moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) can disrupt proteins that regulate an enzyme associated with Alzheimer’s. The paper, published in The Journal of Neuroscience, identifies the complex mechanisms that result in a rapid and robust post-injury elevation of the enzyme, BACE1, in the brain. These results may lead to the development of a drug treatment that targets this mechanism to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.​

​

“A moderate-to-severe TBI, or head trauma, is one of the strongest environmental risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. A serious TBI can lead to a dysfunction in the regulation of the enzyme BACE1. Elevations of this enzyme cause elevated levels of amyloid-beta, the key component of brain plaques associated with senility and Alzheimer’s disease,” said first author Kendall Walker, PhD, postdoctoral associate in the department of neuroscience at Tufts University School of Medicine (TUSM).​

​

Clinton’s brain injury was significant and the damage is lasting. Were she to run complete disclosure of the injury would be a absolute necessity. Personally, I don’t think the risk is worth it. She is brain damaged. Period.
About DrJohn

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.
View all posts by DrJohn →

http://floppingaces.net/2014/02/21/...es-something-even-more-important-to-consider/

 

View attachment 2384 ​

 

Who are you putting up against her to lose?

 

Maybe Romney will run again. The next load of clown car occupants is just bound to be funnier than that last group. I hope they hold lots and lots of debates. Whoever it turns out to be will have to cater to their lunatic fringe tea bagger wing that wants women to not have access to birth control, not just abortions, but "BIRTH CONTROL" for God's sake!!! What's next on their agenda? Taking away women's right to vote without their husband's approval? Re-instituting slavery? Salem witch trials for gays? They've already begun to talk up people like Joe McCarthy.
I hate to tell them but we are not going backwards. They are just going to have to get used to progress in all it's forms or leave for Russia and live under their hero.

 

Perhaps the Dumbocrats can find a junior senator whose only qualification is being a community organizer. That should be enough to beat Hillary in the primaries.

 

And still defeat the circular firing squad candidate

 

An interesting article and a point or two actually made.

So if you really think about it how did a "junior senator" win two terms?

Perhaps because the GOP can't find a candidate that is better? Even remotely. Perhaps the voters can actually see that?

Perhaps because the reading level of a, Ted Cruz for example, seems to be "Green Eggs and Ham"?

He sucked at that as it turned out.


Seriously, and I've been saying it for too many years now, find me a Republican worth voting for. Pull the heads out of the butts and realize I'm probably NOT the only one that feels this way.

As it is now it seems they are like a washing machine that is stuck on "stupid cycle".

 

Don't mind clembo...he's been disenfranchised.

*Brought to you by the "Hillary, 2016" pac...

Scotty approves of this message.

 

Now, that's a question that could be debated for a loooooong time. Just an opinion, of course, but he probably won his first term by (a) not being Hillary Clinton - the Democrats didn't want her, after all - and (b) not being old (relatively speaking). He probably won his second term by lying about Obamacare.

 

No, I'm hoping Biden will run. Please, please, please!!!

 

Biden/Obama'16

 

The NY Senate seat was merely Hillary's boobie prize for having Ted Kennedy, Geaorge Soros and the far left's political machine yank the nomination from her in '08 from her & hand it to BO.

 

Bob Kerrey recently made some comments you might find interesting...

March 28, 2014
Former U.S. Senator Bob Kerrey thinks President Barack Obama, a fellow Democrat, was re-elected in 2012 because he 'sucked less' than former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

The Nebraskan straight-talker told MailOnline in an exclusive interview that Obama isn't up to the job of bringing liberals and conservatives to the table to rescue America's slowly choking entitlement programs.

And Obama, he said Wednesday in his Manhattan office, knew full well he was lying when he promised that the Affordable Care Act would allow Americans to keep insurance plans they liked.
'He had to know he was misleading the audience,' Kerrey said quietly, recalling the newly minted president's countless promises as Congress and the public debated his signature health insurance overhaul.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/2...r-slams-president-obamacare-lies-entitlements

 

Clinton/Obama '16

You don't have candidate to compete with even the VP candidate.

 

Why would you want a couple of liars leading the country? One lied about her sniper-fire experience and is probably now brain-damaged from her concussion while the other lied to your face about being able to keep your doctor. Do you just want to elect people who lie to you, but tell you what you want to hear?

 

For the most part insurance companies chose to upgrade their profit position at your expense. Business as usual, not his fault, get over it.

 

Ophthalmologist says glasses worn by Clinton used to treat double vision

May 16, 2014

A New York ophthalmologist told FoxNews.com that special glasses former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was seen wearing last year are used to treat double vision, which is sometimes caused by severe head trauma.

Dr. Marc Werner explained the purpose of the Fresnel prism eyeglasses, like the ones Clinton wore, amid questions about the potential presidential candidate's health. The subject was raised after Karl Rove commented on her time in and out of the hospital in December 2012.

"In order to see one object, your eyes need to be pointed in the same direction. If your eyes are misaligned, one way to optically align them is to put a prism ... on your glasses," Werner said.

In late 2012, Clinton was suffering from a stomach virus when she fell at her home, struck her head and endured a concussion, according to her representatives. Doctors later discovered a blood clot behind her right ear. Werner says severe head trauma could have caused double vision and Clinton's need for Fresnel prism glasses.

"Any issue which raises intracranial pressure can damage one of the nerves which moves the eye around, and if it damages one of the nerves, your eyes will be misaligned -- maybe temporarily, maybe more permanently," Werner said.

Fox News analyst and former George W. Bush administration adviser Karl Rove recently defended comments he reportedly made saying Clinton's hospitalization would be an issue should she run for president in 2016.

"This was a serious deal. She basically was out of action," Rove said Tuesday. "She spends over a month fighting this. ...And they're not particularly forthcoming."

Clinton's representatives, and husband, have defended her, saying she's "100 percent." Bill Clinton said earlier this week there's "nothing to" the health questions -- though at the same time, he revealed her recovery took about six months, which is much longer than the State Department had indicated.

When asked what he might look for given the chance to see Clinton's medical records, Dr. Werner said he would want to examine imaging studies.

"I would like to know what the results of any imaging studies were and the cause of why someone needed Fresnel," Werner said. "There are lots of different causes, anything from Myasthenia to Multiple Sclerosis to maybe a blood clot, these are all possible causes, but all we know is that she was using a Fresnel prism and therefore had double vision."

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/05/16/ophthalmologist-weighs-in-on-clinton-glasses-spectacle/

 

"Double vision".

"Severe head trauma".

"Concussion".

"Blood clot".

"Nerve damage".

I'm sorry all this has happened to Hillary. I really, truly am. But, I have to ask whether she's physically able to tackle the duties of the presidency. I mean, really... "Severe head trauma" and "nerve damage"?

 

Even if Karl Rove's whisper campaign turned out to be true, she would still be far, far, superior to anyone on the Republican side.