[ame= - OBAMA's TAX PLAN - Penn & Teller and gang return to comment on Barack Obama's socialist plans to turn the United States into a Marxist wasteland! ** FEATURING Plumber, Joe Wurzelbacher. *** Vett Barack Obama, NOT Joe the Plumber! ***[/ame]
[ame= - OBAMA'S TAX PLAN EXPLAINED for those who are CONFUSED! * PROPERLY VETT BARACK OBAMA, NOT Samuel Joseph Joe Wurzelbacher / JOE THE PLUMBER! * THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS and SUPPORT! ** WARNING UNCENSORED! ** Democratic TAX Promise[/ame]
Four years of you eating humble pie and admitting your boogeyman perceptions were all wrong, and 8 years of watching your life get better and better, and still never being able to admit it... Yeah, I can't wait. . .
Won't be able to admit it? Yeah the Obama police will silence me! I'll smear that humble pie all over my face if the dems don't rasie taxes for , I'll say 50,000 a year Americans in the next two years. And take pics and post them.
This goes right along with Al Gore's statements that he want gas to go above ten dollars a gallon so that he can get what he wants. Obama wants the same thing. He wants us to pay financially, sacrafice, and suffer do he can get his way. Tara Lynn Thompson: MORE AUDIO: Obama to "skyrocket" electric bills on purpose
Difference is, I'll be glad to say I was wrong, I hope to God, I'm wrong. I really doubt that you or any other Kool-aid drinker, no I predict and damn near guarantee, that you all will still blame someone else, when this guy, along with Pelosi, and Ried, take our country to the extreme left and we end up the worse. Like I said, I'll praise God and be the first to admit, I'm wrong, if in the next four or eight years, if that happens, we don't lose, or see substantial restrictions on our basic rights and freedoms, as they are established today, under the Bill of Rights, or if we see less of a tax burden and lower government spending, or at least one or more of our energy industries, if not other industries, aren't nationalized. Anyone want to take a wager?
They won't admit they were wrong or eat humble pie. Look forward to 4 years of bitching about the little things (mostly monetary, of course). I believe that Obama & Biden will do great things for the USA. In fact, most people in Australia are planning parties for tomorrow night, to celebrate the positive change that's going to come about. Snafu - I actually feel really bad for you, that you are afraid about this. Half(?) of your countrymen and the majority of the rest of the worlds' population are excited and happy, you should be too.
Gas at $1.79. Recessions are good as long as you keep your current income. The major risk under the Democrats will be a higher unemployment rate similar to the unemployment rate in most of Europe. The fact is we have two socialist parties. The Republicans have never shown any inclination to cut entitlements which is the bulk of non-defense spending. Tax cuts without spending cuts simply lead to huge deficits. The other probability is the loss of the right to bear arms as an individual right, This most likely will not effect those living in red states.
The Grand Old Spending Party How Republicans Became Big Spenders by Stephen Slivinski President Bush has presided over the largest overall increase in inflation-adjusted federal spending since Lyndon B. Johnson. Even after excluding spending on defense and homeland security, Bush is still the biggest-spending president in 30 years. His 2006 budget doesn?t cut enough spending to change his place in history, either. Total government spending grew by 33 percent during Bush?s first term. The federal budget as a share of the economy grew from 18.5 percent of GDP on Clinton?s last day in office to 20.3 percent by the end of Bush?s first term. The Republican Congress has enthusiastically assisted the budget bloat. Inflation-adjusted spending on the combined budgets of the 101 largest programs they vowed to eliminate in 1995 has grown by 27 percent. The GOP was once effective at controlling nondefense spending. The final nondefense budgets under Clinton were a combined $57 billion smaller than what he proposed from 1996 to 2001. Under Bush, Congress passed budgets that spent a total of $91 billion more than the president requested for domestic programs. Bush signed every one of those bills during his first term. Even if Congress passes Bush?s new budget exactly as proposed, not a single cabinetlevel agency will be smaller than when Bush assumed office. Republicans could reform the budget rules that stack the deck in favor of more spending. Unfortunately, senior House Republicans are fighting the changes. The GOP establishment in Washington today has become a defender of big government. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
On a side note: How dare you speak to me of The Crunch? You know nothing of The Crunch. You've never even been to The Crunch!
You mean like we have been for the last 8 years and all the companies of thieves us taxpayers just bought?
I have never said that the past administration was a conservative one. I'm pretty sure George Bush isn't running against Obama.
I believe I recall McCain and Obami touting the bailouts as necessary.. And every other half wit in D.C. damn near..