There is a differance between political enemies (like you) and those that are trying to kill us and destroy this country. So to answer your question, yes. If anything Clinton should have impeached for was these 700 personal FBI files that just happen to be in their private quarters. But since Clinton was a liberal, you will NEVER hear a liberal calling out another liberal. This (spying) is the same power that every president since Carter has used, but for the life of you, you can't handle the fact that Bush is president and he is using this SAME power. It is people like you that will eventually "kill off" this country. You seem to be more interested in terrorist rights than tax paying Americans. You seem to be more interested in how muslim terrorists in Cuba are treated than our American troops. Go ahead a say you support the troops while you spit on them as they return from their tour of duty. Hide behind the 1st amendment. It is your "right". But as you cry out "its a free country" and "I have rights", just remember you also have to right to be stupid. I beleive it is my civic duty to demonstrate to others that may lurk around here just how dangerous your mentality is to the welfare, culture, security, and heritage of these United States. BTW...you don't have to quote the entire post, people can read you know.
OK Mr FBI agent...now PROVE IT. If all your party has to offer the American public is mud to sling because they have no vision or platform, then it really is in the crapper. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) wants to impeach George Bush for spying on our enemies. I hope she keeps on talking because she is looking more like your democratic symbol everytime she opens her mouth! Just take the handle and "flush".
Here you go Danr, since you are so smart, I got a private message just for you.....................370HSSV 0773H
Judges Say Bush Within law By Paul Lewis at 03:17 PM A panel of former Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges yesterday told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that President Bush did NOT act illegally when he created by executive order a wiretapping program conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA). "If a court refuses a FISA application and there is not sufficient time for the president to go to the court of review, the president can under executive order act unilaterally, which he is doing now," said Judge Allan Kornblum, magistrate judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida and an author of the 1978 FISA Act. "I think that the president would be remiss exercising his constitutional authority by giving all of that power over to a statute." so much for Danr's drum beat, Liberal's Censure, or the Democrat's Impeachment.:thumb:
Old Dan, I can't tell if you are kidding or not. Many conservative thinkers [real conservatives, not the more modern neocon types] believe that executive orders are unconstitutional themselves, seeing how this power is not given to the president in the Consititution. What you are basically saying is that anything the president does is legal as long as he gives that right to himself [or herself soon]. This is the beginning of totalitarianism. Regarding the "not sufficient time" clause, the president has 72 hours after the wiretap to request permission. This doesn't seem to much of a burden, unless of course the president is stuck on his ranch and has used up all of his Verizon cell phone minutes for the month.
