I kilt this place

I am exhausted from my attempts to show you the ignorance of your prejudice. Please continue to refer to people as "blacks" or "gay" as much as you want. It reveals your prejudice much more than anything I can add to the discussion.

Oh, you might also consider adding "Kike", "Nigger", "Cracker", "Spic", "Slopehead" and any other derogatory term to your vocabulary (assuming you haven't already done so) since you insist on labeling people contrary to any desire they may have not to be labeled. You might also try "homoseshul" and see how far that gets you.

 

Yes, I know it's a PC issue in your mind. I get that. And thanks for the racist tips. That doesn't say anything about you.

 

Ummmm....

Perhaps a guy that prefers guys to women? ...and doesn't feel the need to hide it?

CAN ANYONE SAY NO BRAINER?

Your "I don't discriminate" line gets old Coin. You work it into "discussions" more than any stinking "typical LiberaL".

BORING AND PREDICTABLE.
REALLY PREDICTABLE.
BEYOND PREDICABLE.

I hope that Takiji can openly marry whomever wherever he lives.

How about you all?

 

No less than I could care if someone was a total moron as long as it doesn't affect me directly.

Dang morons.

Have I mentioned I'm Caucasion and heterosexual?

 

Look, it doesn't matter to me if you poop only occasionally, or get hot during sex...eat some prunes, turn on a fan, and make it quick...those prunes work fast.

 

OK, well why didn't you just say you can't spell? How "predicable" for a typical liberal.

 

Have I mentioned that I couldn't care less?

 

There have been several threads about equality on this forum. You'll find that I'm more open-minded than most liberals on here, e.g. marriage equality.

 

Look kids the spelling police are out!

Predicable for sure.

AND it seems I'm a typical liberal amongst other things.


Golly Geepers! (I think I may have spelled geepers wrong)

Smacks of someone that really doesn't have a valid point in any way, shape and or form.

Somehow I'm not surprised.

 

Apparently I might have misspoke - place don't seem kilt. But there sure is some dead wood that could be trimmed.

 

Understandable. I spelled both big words correctly after all.

 

If you say so it must work in your mind.

Just pull out the "file" on yourself.

When do I get one?

 

Come on now, Clembo. You spelled the word homosexual as "homoseshul" which I realized wasn't a spelling error; it was an attempt at being cute. OK, whatever. But, then you called me out when I said you called him gay. But, you verified that you were, indeed, referring to a homosexual. So, which is it? Homosexual? Homoseshul? Gay? It doesn't really matter how you spelled it, does it? You said it referred to a man who prefers men to women. So be it. It's the same thing as "gay", but you realize that of course. The concern I expressed was that you intentionally referred to someone as "gay" (or "homoseshul" as you called him). The point isn't that Takiji is gay; the point it that you found it necessary to describe him as such. IMO, it really isn't necessary or even worthwhile.

With your misspelling (intended or otherwise) of the word "homosexual" and the subsequent lashing you gave me when I asked what the word was (it's not in the dictionary, trust me) then with the misspelling of "predictable" it was too much to resist. BTW, did you intend to misspell "predictable" or were just trying to be cute with that one, too? With your posts going off onto so many tangents lately, it's hard to keep track.

 

Hmmm...
(and how does one spell that?).

So I intentionally spelled homosexual as homoseshul which you knew was an error yet you decided to call me on it? Why then?

Are you that bored?

As for predictable it was not intentional. I spell better than I type but it seems, at this point, you have nothing better to do.



So let's go back to the gay thing shall we?

Why would I point it out to someone who is obviously so open minded as you?
Has the possibility that I'm not just typing to you personally ever leapt into your mind?

Perhaps other people (and I know they are scarce) on this forum?

I might add that gay people are making tremendous strides in equal rights.
It's in the news and I'm glad for them.

Are you?

As for my posts going off track lately really dude (can I call you that?).

I rarely post because I see the same old crap day after day. JoeNation posts, you post, rlm posts and occasionally I see David or IQLess1.

Same crap. Predictable actually.

So I pop in and am loaded with intangibles. I can understand your pain.

Actually I can't.

You have to think before you type after all. I
always think before I type.

You should try it sometime.

 

I said I realized it WASN'T a spelling error; presumably it was your attempt at trying to be cute. You need to read the post and absorb what is being said before you turn around and attack someone.

You're actually a good speller compared to other "typical liberals" on this forum. It's worth my time to try to find out why someone like you would use the word "homoseshul" instead of the correct word "homosexual". Was it an attempt to make the word sound a bit more "swishy"? Was it just an attempt to try to be cute? Was it an attempt to throw people off somehow? I would like to understand why someone with your intelligence would use such a word (that doesn't exist) and the point you were trying to convey by using it. That's all.

Let's.

That's what I'm trying to figure out. Why would you?

Certainly. However, private messages intended for sole recipients might be better served by using the Private Message feature. Otherwise, your comments are going to be viewed by the entire forum and will, accordingly, be subject to input from every member.

You're preaching to the choir, Honey (may I call you that?).

Only if I can call you "Honey".

Well, I regret that you're not getting much out of this forum. Perhaps it's time you made a decision and asked yourself whether or not you want to stay on this forum. I can't make that decision for you, Honey.

This thread being the exception.

You go, girl.

 

I got binders full of these guys, which one you want?

 

Thanks but I have never needed to have "files" on anyone here. Or anywhere for that matter.

I've been here for nearly six years now and don't have an avatar either as you know.

Why should I waste my time if readers are too engrossed in their own thoughts to even read or consider my opinions after all?

I have to admit that my signature lines are REAL old though. They just struck me and say a lot to anyone with a brain.

 

Who did I exactly attack with my onslaught of cuteness?

Why not? Even if the word doesn't exist. Some think outside the box.
For the record (put this in your files everyone) "homoseshual" is my spelling when I invite the ire of homophobes. Got it?
Now, to be fair CoinOKC I do NOT consider you a homophobe.
Actually, as silly as this forum can be, I have found it refreshing that I don't run into homophobes here.

However, only a handful of "members" actually respond. Perhaps I was looking to invoke the ire of non participating homophobes? Maybe so. Maybe no.

(A footnote here: As I type this homoseshul and homophobe get red sguiggly lines wheres as homophobes doesn't. Interesting. What is the singular speling of homophobes?)

...and very few seem to be responding. I intended for anyone to see my comments.
Why is that a difficult concept for you?

Call me honey call me girl. Really doesn't matter to me.

After all I called you dude and was probably wrong.
























































































...but somehow it's a problem when I call Tak "openly gay".


Go figure.

 

...what?

Bother to give a damn about other people?
Be a bad speller (but better than most typical liberals)?
Eat food because I need it?
Be thankful that I have worked for a living and actually have a roof over my head?
Love the game of hockey?

Wonder why other people don't and state stupid stuff as facts?
Wonder why other people have NO compassion for those less fortunate?

I could go on but the point is really simple.


There are a lot of things we can think about and want to understand about.

Some people are sincere and others aren't.

Some don't give a damn.

 

I didn't say it was a problem, I said that I didn't see the necessity of it. I don't see the necessity of pointing out one's sexuality as a descriptor of that person.

Even though Takiji himself probably couldn't care less that you described him as "openly gay", was it really necessary? Of course, Takiji isn't here to defend himself, so that argument at this point is moot.

You've described yourself as straight and caucasian, but it's not necessary to define (or label) you as "openly straight" or "openly caucasian" when I refer to you. In fact, doing so would be rather discriminatory in regard to the labels that it places upon you. Is that a problem? You decide.

I'm simply saying that it's not necessary.