i feel so clandestine

Discussion in 'Chatter' started by dave hillstrom, Jan 2, 2008.

  1. ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.

    carnivore must hate me now.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  2. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:50:02 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

    > ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.
    >
    > carnivore must hate me now.


    The PGP haul of "Carnivore" (if that's what the main US Federal domestic
    Internet traffic trawling program is still named, and if there's only one,
    both of which seem highly doubtful) is probably broken whenever the
    FBI/CIA/NSA deems the communication of sufficient interest.

    After all, PGP is deliberately weakened (something to do with number and
    depth of "cisterns", IIRC, and maybe more), and I imagine the strength
    that the US Feds would stand for was based on NSA cracking ability . . . .

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    I recognize no authority but the Constitution of the
    United States (some parts of it) and the bouncer at
    Jack's and Charlie's.

    < Benchley
     
  3. On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:02:21 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    >On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:50:02 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
    >
    >> ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.
    >>
    >> carnivore must hate me now.

    >
    >The PGP haul of "Carnivore" (if that's what the main US Federal domestic
    >Internet traffic trawling program is still named, and if there's only one,
    >both of which seem highly doubtful) is probably broken whenever the
    >FBI/CIA/NSA deems the communication of sufficient interest.
    >
    >After all, PGP is deliberately weakened (something to do with number and
    >depth of "cisterns", IIRC, and maybe more), and I imagine the strength
    >that the US Feds would stand for was based on NSA cracking ability . . . .


    i thought it still took like a day for a supercomputer to crack a
    single pgp message. which would mean its ~still~ Pretty Good
    Protection.

    --
    dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

    <This space for rent.>
     
  4. mimus

    mimus Guest

    On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:34:22 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

    > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:02:21 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:50:02 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
    >>
    >>> ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.
    >>>
    >>> carnivore must hate me now.

    >>
    >>The PGP haul of "Carnivore" (if that's what the main US Federal domestic
    >>Internet traffic trawling program is still named, and if there's only one,
    >>both of which seem highly doubtful) is probably broken whenever the
    >>FBI/CIA/NSA deems the communication of sufficient interest.
    >>
    >>After all, PGP is deliberately weakened (something to do with number and
    >>depth of "cisterns", IIRC, and maybe more), and I imagine the strength
    >>that the US Feds would stand for was based on NSA cracking ability . . . .

    >
    > i thought it still took like a day for a supercomputer to crack a
    > single pgp message. which would mean its ~still~ Pretty Good
    > Protection.


    A day's head-start, anyway.

    --
    tinmimus99@hotmail.com

    smeeter 11 or maybe 12

    mp 10

    mhm 29x13

    You want a job and a lizard to ride?

    < _The Einstein Intersection_
     
  5. Dr Entropy

    Dr Entropy Guest

    On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:07:58 -0500, mimus blather'd thus:

    > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:34:22 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:02:21 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:50:02 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.
    >>>>
    >>>> carnivore must hate me now.
    >>>
    >>>The PGP haul of "Carnivore" (if that's what the main US Federal
    >>>domestic Internet traffic trawling program is still named, and if
    >>>there's only one, both of which seem highly doubtful) is probably
    >>>broken whenever the FBI/CIA/NSA deems the communication of sufficient
    >>>interest.
    >>>
    >>>After all, PGP is deliberately weakened (something to do with number
    >>>and depth of "cisterns", IIRC, and maybe more), and I imagine the
    >>>strength that the US Feds would stand for was based on NSA cracking
    >>>ability . . . .

    >>
    >> i thought it still took like a day for a supercomputer to crack a
    >> single pgp message. which would mean its ~still~ Pretty Good
    >> Protection.

    >
    > A day's head-start, anyway.


    'Gimme three steps..."



    --
    Dr E--
    mhm 17x1
    SGM #3
    smeeter #13
    FWAC:"Old No.-7"
    Surgeon General-Relativity
    Commodore/Upper-Half/1st Virginia Volunteers/CEsium Brigade
    NF & TCIB. ATFFFIQ
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "The flames kindled on the fourth of July, seventeen hundred and
    seventy six, have spread over too much of the globe to be extinguished
    by the feeble engines of despotism." -- Thomas Jefferson
     
  6. On Jan 2, 3:07 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:34:22 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
    > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:02:21 -0500, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com>
    > > wrote:

    >
    > >>On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:50:02 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

    >
    > >>> ive successfully installed PGP in my email client.

    >
    > >>> carnivore must hate me now.

    >
    > >>The PGP haul of "Carnivore" (if that's what the main US Federal domestic
    > >>Internet traffic trawling program is still named, and if there's only one,
    > >>both of which seem highly doubtful) is probably broken whenever the
    > >>FBI/CIA/NSA deems the communication of sufficient interest.

    >
    > >>After all, PGP is deliberately weakened (something to do with number and
    > >>depth of "cisterns", IIRC, and maybe more), and I imagine the strength
    > >>that the US Feds would stand for was based on NSA cracking ability . . . .

    >
    > > i thought it still took like a day for a supercomputer to crack a
    > > single pgp message. which would mean its ~still~ Pretty Good
    > > Protection.

    >
    > A day's head-start, anyway.
    >

    Just make sure you got yer runnin shoes on.

    --
    Slipped Moebius
    mhm28x9
     

Share This Page