right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the twist at the end which made perfect sence.
On Jan 29, 2:09 pm, metro-golden-meower <metro-golden-meo...@meow.org> wrote: > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the > twist at the end which made perfect sence. No. No, no no. You are now on time out. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the > twist at the end which made perfect sence. The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't bad, even starring Charlton Heston. -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 "It's a Boo--!" < _The Hunting of the Snark_
On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: > > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the > > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood > > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the > > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am > > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the > > twist at the end which made perfect sence. > > The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't > bad, even starring Charlton Heston. I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: > On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: >> >> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. >> >> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't >> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. > > I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word > to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a > brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't > no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. <double shudder> -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 Lady, we are all insane in this place. I do not think we want to leave. < "A Planet Named Shayol"
On Jan 29, 7:31 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: > > On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: > > >> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the > >> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood > >> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the > >> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am > >> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the > >> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. > > >> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't > >> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. > > > I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word > > to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a > > brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't > > no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. > > You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. > > <double shudder> > I don't want poetry. I just want a waterfall running through the middle of my house, is all I'm sayin'. -- Slipped Moebius mhm28x9
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:35:06 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: > On Jan 29, 7:31 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: >> >> > On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: >> >> >> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >> >> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >> >> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >> >> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >> >> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >> >> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. >> >> >> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't >> >> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. >> >> > I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word >> > to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a >> > brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't >> > no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. >> >> You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. >> >> <double shudder> > > I don't want poetry. I just want a waterfall running through the > middle of my house, is all I'm sayin'. Read Jack Vance. He's the Roger Dean of fantasy/sci-fi. Start with _Maske: Thaery_ (heh) (you'll get it once you read it). And then _Showboat World_ (aka some long title I can never remember). And then _The Gray Prince_ aka _The Grey Prince_ aka _The Domains of Coryphon_. And then _The Last Castle_. And after that, er, hum, yes, the "Durdane" trilogy, _The Faceless Man_, _The Brave Free Men_ and _The Asutra_ <shudder>. -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 Decorum, after all, was a more subtle and ultimately more satisfactory weapon than high feelings and improper conduct. < Jack Vance
"metro-golden-meower" <metro-golden-meower@meow.org> wrote in message news:as8vp3d600d6opm5pie7sm3v4ar0l0pgqt@4ax.com... > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the > twist at the end which made perfect sence. I didn't like the ending of this one. I'll bet Hollyweird changes it. Smee
Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet: : right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the : film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood : has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the : book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am : looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the : twist at the end which made perfect sence. being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie and I loved it. -- Steve Leyland mhm32x16 Smeeter#24 WSD#41 Most Hated Usenetizen Of All Time#1 Top Asshole on the Net#4 Usenet Ruiner#11 Lits Slut#1 alt.hackers.malicious awards 2007 Pedo-Baiter Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept) http://mar.exilenet.org:9042/listen.pls =^MEOW MEOW ARMY^= Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular? ====================================================================== "Oh, and by the by ... although it is not my particular responsibility to do so, I do nevertheless apologize for Mr. Leyland, who seems convinced that anyone who might pass by this doorway to our little gallery is a child rapist. In a sense, he is much like the ratty kitty he claims to be in his interminable signature line ... he wanders about and stops occassionally at the stoop here to spray and defecate, then moves on and is gone for a few days or so ... no doubt spraying, defecating and retching up hairballs elsewhere ... then returns to mark his "territory" again. I realise he is little more than a malodorous nusiance, but a nuisance nevertheless." HMS Victor Victorian, pedophile, alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy ====================================================================== "Warning to all: Steve Leyland is a trolling twat of the highest order. Killfile the muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*" bear, uk.rec.motorcycles ====================================================================== "I didn't delete any part of your meaningless, pointless, worthless post in order to clearly demonstrate that you are the nemesis of Usenet: the crossposting, non-editing, diagram-creating worthless, dickless, brainless, gutless, mindless, ball-less, spineless, flaccid, obese, fish-belly pale, ugly, VD-ridden, moronic, bald, hunch-backed, flat-footed, odoriferous, obnoxious, fecal-smelling, buck-toothed, physically handicapped, fungus-infected, HIV positive, mud-packing, masturbating, whining, simpering, self-important, arrogant, egomaniacal POS that takes up more bandwidth than a despicable binary-poster, and for no apparent reason beyond seeing his own defecatory vomitus slithering down the screen in vile green rivulets." Admiral Halsey, alt.sailing.asa ====================================================================== "I went to the Garden of Love, And saw what I never had seen; A Chapel was built in the midst, Where I used to play on the green. And the gates of this Chapel were shut And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door; So I turned to the Garden of Love That so many sweet flowers bore. And I saw it was filled with graves, And tombstones where flowers should be; And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds, And binding with briars my joys and desires." William Blake. ====================================================================== "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 19. ====================================================================== "When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment." |\ _.-'~~""'~`'~) /, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--'' |,4) ./ ' ; ;/' '-~~;'@ ( ; ; _.--'' _.-_..' .;.' (,_..----''' (,..--'' meow
Dear, "metro-golden-meower": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >twist at the end which made perfect sence. They already fucked it up thirty years ago with Charlton Heston. Please keep up. -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Dear, "mimus": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: > >> On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: >>> >>> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. >>> >>> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't >>> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. >> >> I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word >> to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a >> brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't >> no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. > >You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. Oooh, snap! YOU GONNA TAKE THAT, SLIPPY? ><double shudder> -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet: > >: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >: twist at the end which made perfect sence. > >being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie and I >loved it. How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months before people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it was probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do that? -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:40:45 -0500, Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> wrote: >Dear, "mimus": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: > >>On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: >> >>> On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: >>>> >>>> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>>> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>>> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>>> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>>> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. >>>> >>>> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't >>>> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. >>> >>> I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word >>> to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a >>> brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't >>> no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. >> >>You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. > >Oooh, snap! YOU GONNA TAKE THAT, SLIPPY? > >><double shudder> what a bunch of churlish boars, the lot of them. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:46:45 -0500, Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> wrote: >Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >NO: > >>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet: >> >>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>: twist at the end which made perfect sence. >> >>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie and I >>loved it. > >How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many >months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be >released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his >laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months before >people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it was >probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do that? you must become a jeddi, of course. -- dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj <This space for rent.>
Dear, "dave hillstrom": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:40:45 -0500, Wavy G <godsspeciallamb@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>Dear, "mimus": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >> >>>On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0800, Slipped Moebius wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 29, 5:06 pm, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:09:35 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>>> > film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>>>> > has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>>>> > book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>>>> > looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>>>> > twist at the end which made perfect sence. >>>>> >>>>> The book was solid. The first film made from it, _The Omega Man_, wasn't >>>>> bad, even starring Charlton Heston. >>>> >>>> I have more than a few gripes with the book. Solid may be a good word >>>> to describe its structural integrity the same way you might say, oh, a >>>> brick outhouse is solid, but a work of art... wellllll, Matheson ain't >>>> no Frank Lloyd Wright, that's fer dam. >>> >>>You want poetry, read William Blake or Ezra Pound. >> >>Oooh, snap! YOU GONNA TAKE THAT, SLIPPY? >> >>><double shudder> > >what a bunch of churlish boars, the lot of them. Yes, scurvy curs, the lot of them! -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) > NO: > >>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet: >> >>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the twist >>: at the end which made perfect sence. >> >>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie and I >>loved it. > > How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many > months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be > released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his > laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months before > people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it was > probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do that? It's called Usenet. Look into it. (star wars movies suck hard) -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >Wavy G wrote: > >> Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >> NO: >> >>>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to >usenet: >>> >>>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>>: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>>: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>>: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the twist >>>: at the end which made perfect sence. >>> >>>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie and I >>>loved it. >> >> How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many >> months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be >> released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his >> laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months before >> people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it was >> probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do that? > >It's called Usenet. Look into it. > >(star wars movies suck hard) Usenet has movies *before* they're released to the public? That's what I'm asking about: How do you get a movie that hasn't been released yet? -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >>Wavy G wrote: >> >>> Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( >>> ) NO: >>> >>>>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>>>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to >>>>usenet: >>>> >>>>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>>>: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>>>: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>>>: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>>>: twist at the end which made perfect sence. >>>> >>>>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie >>>>and I loved it. >>> >>> How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many >>> months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be >>> released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his >>> laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months >>> before people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it >>> was probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do >>> that? >> >>It's called Usenet. Look into it. >> >>(star wars movies suck hard) > > Usenet has movies *before* they're released to the public? That's what > I'm asking about: How do you get a movie that hasn't been released yet? As I understand it, after a movie is initially cut to be presented to test audiences, it passes through several hands and is also sent to several other people (in the biz). These vids often have (every few minutes) something stating that it is a pre-release. Basically, it was leaked. Or stolen as that is a more correct term. Somebody made a copy for his friend and.... There you are, watching the movie way early. -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >Wavy G wrote: > >> Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >>>Wavy G wrote: >>> >>>> Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( >>>> ) NO: >>>> >>>>>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>>>>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to >>>>>usenet: >>>>> >>>>>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>>>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how hollywood >>>>>: has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over impressed with the >>>>>: book, it wasn't as good as i was led to believe. then again, i am >>>>>: looking at it from 50(?) years after it was writen. i did like the >>>>>: twist at the end which made perfect sence. >>>>> >>>>>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie >>>>>and I loved it. >>>> >>>> How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, many >>>> months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to be >>>> released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his >>>> laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months >>>> before people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, it >>>> was probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you do >>>> that? >>> >>>It's called Usenet. Look into it. >>> >>>(star wars movies suck hard) >> >> Usenet has movies *before* they're released to the public? That's what >> I'm asking about: How do you get a movie that hasn't been released yet? > >As I understand it, after a movie is initially cut to be presented to test >audiences, it passes through several hands and is also sent to several other >people (in the biz). These vids often have (every few minutes) something >stating that it is a pre-release. Basically, it was leaked. Or stolen as >that is a more correct term. Somebody made a copy for his friend and.... >There you are, watching the movie way early. That's awesome. I feel like I was part of a conspiracy or something. -- Mimus hasn't written anything funny about me lately. ***************************************** * * * Wavy G * * mail me at: * * godsspeciallamb@gmail.com * * * * * *****************************************
Wavy G wrote: > Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) NO: >>Wavy G wrote: >> >>> Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES ( ) >>> NO: >>>>Wavy G wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear, "Steve Leyland": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES >>>>> ( ) NO: >>>>> >>>>>>Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called >>>>>>metro-golden-meower stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to >>>>>>usenet: >>>>>> >>>>>>: right. i have now read the book. now all i have to do is watch the >>>>>>: film after dling it sometime 'round cristmas. lets see how >>>>>>: hollywood has fucked over yet another book. i wasn't over >>>>>>: impressed with the book, it wasn't as good as i was led to >>>>>>: believe. then again, i am looking at it from 50(?) years after it >>>>>>: was writen. i did like the twist at the end which made perfect >>>>>>: sence. >>>>>> >>>>>>being an evul copyright thief I hace seen teh dvd rip of this movie >>>>>>and I loved it. >>>>> >>>>> How the fuck do people do that anyway? I remember back in 2002, >>>>> many months before "Star Wars Attack of the Clones" to scheduled to >>>>> be released, this guy at work downloaded the whole damn thing on his >>>>> laptop. I sat there and watched the entire movie at work, months >>>>> before people were lining up to pay money to see it. Looking back, >>>>> it was probly the best day of my life. Anyway, how the fuck do you >>>>> do that? >>>> >>>>It's called Usenet. Look into it. >>>> >>>>(star wars movies suck hard) >>> >>> Usenet has movies *before* they're released to the public? That's >>> what I'm asking about: How do you get a movie that hasn't been >>> released yet? >> >>As I understand it, after a movie is initially cut to be presented to >>test audiences, it passes through several hands and is also sent to >>several other people (in the biz). These vids often have (every few >>minutes) something stating that it is a pre-release. Basically, it was >>leaked. Or stolen as that is a more correct term. Somebody made a copy >>for his friend and.... There you are, watching the movie way early. > > That's awesome. I feel like I was part of a conspiracy or something. Just the benefactor of someone elses crime. -- Tim Weaver I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
