How many Republicans can you name...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Moen1305, Nov 22, 2005.

  1. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    Ok Danr if you feel that way about Steve's quote, which was a response to Moen's quote, shouldn't you feel as upset about Moens quote and feel just as outraged?
     
  2. Danr

    Danr New Member

    Moen takes a lot of cr*pola here and he is basically correct in his thinking. As for me I am not outraged really think that the urge to KILLKILLKILL is a sickness even if it is those evil Muslims.
     
  3. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    So are you saying Danr that if someone else responds to Moens quote they are wrong but it is ok for Moen to state the quote in the first place?

    Now think. Why would Moen even state that when I was saying to him that I was wrong about the amount of Republicians.....etc. and are my posts to the points that I try to make and not about the individual people who may disagree with them? So why the attack?
     
  4. Danr

    Danr New Member

    I am saying that the M-man gets ganged up on a bit to much so I can see why he lashes out.
     
  5. Steve E

    Steve E New Member

    Probably has nothing to do with his personal insults and constant attacks. There are those who like to disagree just to start a heated debate, no matter what the topic.
     
  6. rambozo

    rambozo New Member

    no they dont. you're a liar. :goofer:
     
  7. Andy

    Andy Well-Known Member

    How was he ganged up on in this thread before he "lashed out"
    I was speaking about freedom from wrongful prosecution and mentioned that I thought Clinton was wrongfully attacked by a misuse of the law as well as Libby and Stewart. I mentioned that I was wrong about the amount of republicians who would not support this misuse of the law. OldDan made a post that supported what I said and also showed me how I was wrong about the amount of Republicians. It was a fair and balanced post that could have been doctored but was not.
    And Moen responds with how he responded. There was no logical reason for his response and I can not see how anyone who is the slightestly objective could defend it.
     
  8. craigG

    craigG New Member

  9. OldDan

    OldDan New Member

    Isn't this a little ambivalent? Well yes and no........
     

Share This Page