Guess The Troll (Round Two)

"dracosilv" <dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote in news:485ae8ad$0$12971
$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:

> gregvk wrote:
>> "dracosilv" <dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote in
>> news:485adccf$0$12956$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:g3e1qd$ndi$2 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One time, I will tell you: I'm not giving gregvk any information
>>>>>> about anything. Everything he's posting is his own work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except all that email you keep sending to greg@nospam.okthx.
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Yeah. That.
>>>
>>> Here's the kicker though, how does greg know that you're posting mail
>>> to that garbage address?
>>
>> Are you competing with Dimmy for the title of Stupidest Fuck In The
>> History of Usenet, or what?
>
> "Or what". But seriously, I'm trying to have some fun and make a joke.

You *are* a joke.

 

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:g3equt$o4m$3
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> gregvk wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>> news:sj7l541j7llfbea2b81rti31cnoclpcsjm@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:52 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure it is, Sweety, sure it is. You just keep bleating that and pray
>>> to whatever God you believe in that anyone is actually buyin into yer
>>> bullshit.
>>
>> You sound upset. Gonna go RL on her to try to shut her up?
>
> It's been tried before.

That's the main problem with posting with your full real name. You risk
attracting waaaay too much attention from out-of-control freaks who are
sometimes willing (either due to stupidity or false self-confidence) to do
some pretty shocking shit IRL.

> I don't expect he'll get much further than the
> last two fuckheads, but he can always give it a whirl.

Failure doesn't phase him.

 

FrozenNorth wrote:
> dracosilv wrote:
>
>> mariposas rand mair fheal wrote:
>>> In article <5924856.Cx97hbQ3oD@frozennorth.to>,
>>> FrozenNorth <frozennorth123@gm.nospam.ail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> dracosilv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:g3e1qd$ndi$2 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:01:31 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>>>>>>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:09:14 GMT, The Original Demon Prince
>>>>>>>>>>> of Absurdity
>>>>>>>>>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.everyposehasits.corn> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:32:42 +0000, gregvk did the cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yardwork wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:24:26 +0000, Eris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kallisti Discordia was laughing at the antics of gregvk,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when they suddenly burst out in tears:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Jackanapes, Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kicked your ass so hard as to induce permanent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> butthurt and a raging, therapy-proof obsession. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might be good for a few laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, I don't know that anyone *has* kicked my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> butt; however, I think I just noticed a hanging chad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I was off usenet for over a year, except for posting a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few ballots (which doesn't count for much, since I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't reading AUK after early May '07)/ RuneScape
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> became more interesting."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...You, admitting that you were spanked off Usenet for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over a year, in http://spankardconfession.notlong.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many times are you going to respond to that same post?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the second one -- gonna go for a third?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice dodge of my guess at one of your other selves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, that's not how Guess The Troll is played.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's how it works: You list everyone who has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> established a homestead in your skull, while I point and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> laugh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe you're Robert A. Heinlein. However, you
>>>>>>>>>>>> might be Chad Stone, or Sean Monaghan (maybe the two of
>>>>>>>>>>>> them teaming up), but one survey says you're a lying troll
>>>>>>>>>>>> who wasn't on usenet before
>>>>>>>>>>>> purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He's a webtard whose getting help from Rhonda.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What kind of help, exactly, am I giving him? And how?
>>>>>>>>>> Telepathy?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask dumbfuck questions that you already know the
>>>>>>>>> answers to, Dumbfuck?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea how I'm helping him. It's certainly not in email
>>>>>>>> or by phone. I'm not sending him snail mail either. Or
>>>>>>>> telegrams.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So if you are correct in your assertion, it must be telepathy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Basically she's
>>>>>>>>>>> feeding him tactics and telling him what he should do to try
>>>>>>>>>>> and make people think he's an oldbie Usenet poaster. On his
>>>>>>>>>>> own he's a complete fuckin n00b, but using her liak his
>>>>>>>>>>> personal bitch he's able to present himself as being moar
>>>>>>>>>>> than just a flunkie Webbie board drop out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <sigh>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sucks to have yer trollie attempt exposed liak that, huh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One time, I will tell you: I'm not giving gregvk any
>>>>>>>> information about anything. Everything he's posting is his own
>>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except all that email you keep sending to greg@nospam.okthx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh. Yeah. That.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the kicker though, how does greg know that you're posting
>>>>> mail to that garbage address? Seems like there's more to this
>>>>> than there appears.
>>>>>
>>>> Did you know gullible is the only word not in the dictionary?
>>>
>>> wait a sec
>>>
>>> hey youre right
>>> its spelt gullable
>>
>> Nazi.
>
> I hereby invoke Godwin's Law
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Grammar nazi then. Or spelling (f)lamer for you P.C. people.
>
>>>
>>> arf meow arf - raggedy ann and andy for president and vice
>>> limp and spineless lint for brains is better yet and nice
>>> then rueing pair of shrub and dick the republican lice
>>> call me desdenova seven seven seven seven seven seven

--
But they spend 90% of their time standing there looking stupid and (in
your case) eyeballing everyone and wondering how they look naked.
gregvk on what he thinks WalMart greeters do.

In the immortal words of ???hw??f:
This is you not giving a shit?
HA HA I MADE YUO POST!
I win & stuff.

"Over the years, I've seen many jerks come and go. The latest crop is
not as smart. They're less ass and more hole or is it the other way
around? <snicker>" The Daring Dufas

How do he produce so much doo-doo so fast? It's amazing!
The Daring Dufas

Yeah, UPS, Usenet Performance Stupidity. ^_^
Onideus Mad Hatter

Golly Wiggle!
Uncle Monster

 

gregvk wrote:
> "dracosilv" <dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote in news:485ae8ad$0$12971
> $4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>
>> gregvk wrote:
>>> "dracosilv" <dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote in
>>> news:485adccf$0$12956$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>>>
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:g3e1qd$ndi$2 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One time, I will tell you: I'm not giving gregvk any information
>>>>>>> about anything. Everything he's posting is his own work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except all that email you keep sending to greg@nospam.okthx.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh. Yeah. That.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the kicker though, how does greg know that you're posting
>>>> mail to that garbage address?
>>>
>>> Are you competing with Dimmy for the title of Stupidest Fuck In The
>>> History of Usenet, or what?
>>
>> "Or what". But seriously, I'm trying to have some fun and make a
>> joke.
>
> You *are* a joke.

How do you figure?

--
But they spend 90% of their time standing there looking stupid and (in
your case) eyeballing everyone and wondering how they look naked.
gregvk on what he thinks WalMart greeters do.

In the immortal words of ???hw??f:
This is you not giving a shit?
HA HA I MADE YUO POST!
I win & stuff.

"Over the years, I've seen many jerks come and go. The latest crop is
not as smart. They're less ass and more hole or is it the other way
around? <snicker>" The Daring Dufas

How do he produce so much doo-doo so fast? It's amazing!
The Daring Dufas

Yeah, UPS, Usenet Performance Stupidity. ^_^
Onideus Mad Hatter

Golly Wiggle!
Uncle Monster

 

Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:33:00 -0400, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:54:19 -0400, Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:50:21 +0000 (UTC), spooge
>><spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
>>>news:8sgf54dg15ivtvqs37na03nh3kn4n5u890@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:10:35 +0000 (UTC), spooge
>>>> <spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:mair_fheal-72C17E.13544716062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <pnhd54l8pa8d9k00h1kqfk4c425vq552i0@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> St. Raoul Xemblinosky <saintraoul@catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:21:34 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>>>>>>> <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >In article <5rpc545pl8tln12fmipn24vlluirinoena@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> > Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:57:34 -0700, Stella Starr <none@none.net>
>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> >Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >>> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >Just in case there's anyone so impulse-challenged they might
>>>>>>> >> >respond, this is one of the reasons to find the self control. No
>>>>>>> >> >aviation content, no aviation interest, all the content of a kid
>>>>>>> >> >with a can of spray paint.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >All together now....ignore!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Well done! The ignroing is obvious!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >i am ingroning your obvious troll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't even read your post, much less reply to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i disdain in your general nonexistence
>>>>>
>>>>>Hmmmm?
>>>>
>>>> Breakfast burrito.
>>>
>>>Igor Larinov.
>>
>>In a burrito?
>
>wed have to bbq and shred him

Open pit Igor.

Jade

 

mariposas rand mair fheal wrote:
> In article <g3elgk$b80$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>> gregvk wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
>>> news:g3e1qd$ndi$2 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:01:31 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:09:14 GMT, The Original Demon Prince of
>>>>>>> Absurdity <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.everyposehasits.corn>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:32:42 +0000, gregvk did the cha-cha, and
>>>>>>>> screamed:
>>>>>>>>> Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and
>>>>>>>>> Yardwork wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:24:26 +0000, Eris Kallisti
>>>>>>>>>> Discordia was laughing at the antics of gregvk, when they
>>>>>>>>>> suddenly burst out in tears:
>>>>>>>>>>> "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either St.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jackanapes, Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> raging, therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> few laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, I don't know that anyone *has* kicked my butt;
>>>>>>>>>>>> however, I think I just noticed a hanging chad...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "I was off usenet for over a year, except for posting a few
>>>>>>>>>>> ballots (which doesn't count for much, since I wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> reading AUK after early May '07)/ RuneScape became more
>>>>>>>>>>> interesting."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...You, admitting that you were spanked off Usenet for over
>>>>>>>>>>> a year, in http://spankardconfession.notlong.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> HTH!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTW
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How many times are you going to respond to that same post?
>>>>>>>>> This is the second one -- gonna go for a third?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nice dodge of my guess at one of your other selves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry, that's not how Guess The Troll is played.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's how it works: You list everyone who has established a
>>>>>>>>> homestead in your skull, while I point and laugh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't believe you're Robert A. Heinlein. However, you might
>>>>>>>> be Chad Stone, or Sean Monaghan (maybe the two of them teaming
>>>>>>>> up), but one survey says you're a lying troll who wasn't on
>>>>>>>> usenet before purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's a webtard whose getting help from Rhonda.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What kind of help, exactly, am I giving him? And how? Telepathy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you ask dumbfuck questions that you already know the
>>>>> answers to, Dumbfuck?
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea how I'm helping him. It's certainly not in email or
>>>> by phone. I'm not sending him snail mail either. Or telegrams.
>>>>
>>>> So if you are correct in your assertion, it must be telepathy.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically she's
>>>>>>> feeding him tactics and telling him what he should do to try and
>>>>>>> make people think he's an oldbie Usenet poaster. On his own
>>>>>>> he's a complete fuckin n00b, but using her liak his personal
>>>>>>> bitch he's able to present himself as being moar than just a
>>>>>>> flunkie Webbie board drop out.
>>>>>
>>>>>> <sigh>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sucks to have yer trollie attempt exposed liak that, huh?
>>>>
>>>> One time, I will tell you: I'm not giving gregvk any information
>>>> about anything. Everything he's posting is his own work.
>>>
>>> Except all that email you keep sending to greg@nospam.okthx.
>>
>> Oh. Yeah. That.
>
> mother theresa?
> walter kronkite?
> jerry springer?
> spanky and our gang?
> deep throat?
> chrysta now?

Now there's an eclectic mix.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

 

gregvk wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
> news:g3equt$o4m$3 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> gregvk wrote:
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>> news:sj7l541j7llfbea2b81rti31cnoclpcsjm@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:52 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sure it is, Sweety, sure it is. You just keep bleating that and
>>>> pray to whatever God you believe in that anyone is actually buyin
>>>> into yer bullshit.
>>>
>>> You sound upset. Gonna go RL on her to try to shut her up?
>>
>> It's been tried before.
>
> That's the main problem with posting with your full real name. You
> risk attracting waaaay too much attention from out-of-control freaks
> who are sometimes willing (either due to stupidity or false
> self-confidence) to do some pretty shocking shit IRL.

Usenet was better when everyone posted with their full real name.

But he's going to have a very difficult time finding valid real life
information about me, even if he spends money to do it.

>> I don't expect he'll get much further than the
>> last two fuckheads, but he can always give it a whirl.
>
> Failure doesn't phase him.

No shit.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

 

In article <g3gd4p$o7d$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:

> mariposas rand mair fheal wrote:
> > In article <g3elgk$b80$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> gregvk wrote:
> >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
> >>> news:g3e1qd$ndi$2 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> >>>
> >>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:01:31 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >>>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:09:14 GMT, The Original Demon Prince of
> >>>>>>> Absurdity <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.everyposehasits.corn>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:32:42 +0000, gregvk did the cha-cha, and
> >>>>>>>> screamed:
> >>>>>>>>> Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and
> >>>>>>>>> Yardwork wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hail Eris! On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:24:26 +0000, Eris Kallisti
> >>>>>>>>>> Discordia was laughing at the antics of gregvk, when they
> >>>>>>>>>> suddenly burst out in tears:
> >>>>>>>>>>> "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either St.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jackanapes, Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spankard you asked. LOL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> raging, therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> few laughs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> As I said, I don't know that anyone *has* kicked my butt;
> >>>>>>>>>>>> however, I think I just noticed a hanging chad...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "I was off usenet for over a year, except for posting a few
> >>>>>>>>>>> ballots (which doesn't count for much, since I wasn't
> >>>>>>>>>>> reading AUK after early May '07)/ RuneScape became more
> >>>>>>>>>>> interesting."
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ...You, admitting that you were spanked off Usenet for over
> >>>>>>>>>>> a year, in http://spankardconfession.notlong.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> HTH!!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> BTW
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How many times are you going to respond to that same post?
> >>>>>>>>> This is the second one -- gonna go for a third?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> nice dodge of my guess at one of your other selves.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sorry, that's not how Guess The Troll is played.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Here's how it works: You list everyone who has established a
> >>>>>>>>> homestead in your skull, while I point and laugh.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't believe you're Robert A. Heinlein. However, you might
> >>>>>>>> be Chad Stone, or Sean Monaghan (maybe the two of them teaming
> >>>>>>>> up), but one survey says you're a lying troll who wasn't on
> >>>>>>>> usenet before purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> He's a webtard whose getting help from Rhonda.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What kind of help, exactly, am I giving him? And how? Telepathy?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why do you ask dumbfuck questions that you already know the
> >>>>> answers to, Dumbfuck?
> >>>>
> >>>> I have no idea how I'm helping him. It's certainly not in email or
> >>>> by phone. I'm not sending him snail mail either. Or telegrams.
> >>>>
> >>>> So if you are correct in your assertion, it must be telepathy.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> Basically she's
> >>>>>>> feeding him tactics and telling him what he should do to try and
> >>>>>>> make people think he's an oldbie Usenet poaster. On his own
> >>>>>>> he's a complete fuckin n00b, but using her liak his personal
> >>>>>>> bitch he's able to present himself as being moar than just a
> >>>>>>> flunkie Webbie board drop out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> <sigh>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sucks to have yer trollie attempt exposed liak that, huh?
> >>>>
> >>>> One time, I will tell you: I'm not giving gregvk any information
> >>>> about anything. Everything he's posting is his own work.
> >>>
> >>> Except all that email you keep sending to greg@nospam.okthx.
> >>
> >> Oh. Yeah. That.
> >
> > mother theresa?
> > walter kronkite?
> > jerry springer?
> > spanky and our gang?
> > deep throat?
> > chrysta now?
>
> Now there's an eclectic mix.

lee harvey oswald?

arf meow arf - raggedy ann and andy for president and vice
limp and spineless lint for brains is better yet and nice
then rueing pair of shrub and dick the republican lice
call me desdenova seven seven seven seven seven seven

 

Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:01:50 +0000, gregvk wrote:

> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
> news:pan.2008.06.19.14.51.44.279078@netscape.net:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:16 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>
>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>> news:pan.2008.06.18.15.42.33.174120@netscape.net:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:21:36 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.17.15.04.55.465134@netscape.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:09:51 +0000, spooge wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:150620082031179511%erfc-1024@usa.net:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> spooge <spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:Xns9ABDEC4697438A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
>>> <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> newsan.2008.06.15.02.38.34.652092
>>>>> @ia.ia.nngh.yog.sothoth.neblod.zin
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a
>>> beady
>>>>>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be
>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>><snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either St.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jackanapes,
>>>>> Atlas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bugged
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>your
>>>>> ass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on
>>>>>>>>>> this article (give or take an hour).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-snipped-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Lies, damned lies and statistics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lies posted to usenet? I am *shocked*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed, alt.* is going to hell in a hand-basket.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Verizon decided to become pussies and stop carrying the alt.*
>>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>> Verizon sucks. Get credo mobile, fyi.
>>>
>>> The larger an organization gets, the more they suck. (This seems to
>>> be especially true of banks, phone companies and ISPs.) Always do
>>> business with small-to-medium size businesses, if you can.
>>>
>> Yeap.
>>
>>>>>> Details on /.org
>>>>>
>>>>> No Verizon users? No loss. ...Let's hope a few other ISPs follow
>>> suit.
>>>>
>>>> You dont want playmates on teh usernets?
>>>
>>>
>>> They can still use NSPs. NSP users are less likely to be whining
>>> fuckheads, anyway.
>>
>> Lets all give Gary and Chris some biz
>
> They can have all the people who think $5 (or more) per mo for Usenet is
> actually a good deal.

It takes a bit of shopping to get FREE.
Or just search www.newzbot.com

 

Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
news:pan.2008.06.20.15.25.54.574385@netscape.net:

> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:01:50 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>
>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>> news:pan.2008.06.19.14.51.44.279078@netscape.net:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:16 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>
>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>> news:pan.2008.06.18.15.42.33.174120@netscape.net:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:21:36 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.17.15.04.55.465134@netscape.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:09:51 +0000, spooge wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:150620082031179511%erfc-1024@usa.net:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> spooge <spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns9ABDEC4697438A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
>>>> <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> newsan.2008.06.15.02.38.34.652092
>>>>>> @ia.ia.nngh.yog.sothoth.neblod.zin
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>> beady
>>>>>>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sat in thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either St.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jackanapes,
>>>>>> Atlas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bugged
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your
>>>>>> ass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on
>>>>>>>>>>> this article (give or take an hour).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>-snipped-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Lies, damned lies and statistics.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lies posted to usenet? I am *shocked*.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed, alt.* is going to hell in a hand-basket.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Verizon decided to become pussies and stop carrying the alt.*
>>>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>> Verizon sucks. Get credo mobile, fyi.
>>>>
>>>> The larger an organization gets, the more they suck. (This seems
>>>> to be especially true of banks, phone companies and ISPs.) Always
>>>> do business with small-to-medium size businesses, if you can.
>>>>
>>> Yeap.
>>>
>>>>>>> Details on /.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No Verizon users? No loss. ...Let's hope a few other ISPs
>>>>>> follow
>>>> suit.
>>>>>
>>>>> You dont want playmates on teh usernets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They can still use NSPs. NSP users are less likely to be whining
>>>> fuckheads, anyway.
>>>
>>> Lets all give Gary and Chris some biz
>>
>> They can have all the people who think $5 (or more) per mo for Usenet
>> is actually a good deal.
>
> It takes a bit of shopping to get FREE.
> Or just search www.newzbot.com

The problem with free providers is that you aren't worth anything to them.
They have no incentive to keep you happy. Hell, they don't have any
incentive to even keep your account open.

 

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:g3gd4q$o7d$2
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> gregvk wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in
>> news:g3equt$o4m$3 @blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>> news:sj7l541j7llfbea2b81rti31cnoclpcsjm@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:52 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>>>> <nimue@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure it is, Sweety, sure it is. You just keep bleating that and
>>>>> pray to whatever God you believe in that anyone is actually buyin
>>>>> into yer bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> You sound upset. Gonna go RL on her to try to shut her up?
>>>
>>> It's been tried before.
>>
>> That's the main problem with posting with your full real name. You
>> risk attracting waaaay too much attention from out-of-control freaks
>> who are sometimes willing (either due to stupidity or false
>> self-confidence) to do some pretty shocking shit IRL.
>
> Usenet was better when everyone posted with their full real name.

Although that would make most people think a little harder about what
they do OL, it would not stop secret stalking.

> But he's going to have a very difficult time finding valid real life
> information about me, even if he spends money to do it.

Meh. Don't get too confident. Everyone's current RL info gets spread
around so far and wide that it's pretty much impossible to keep a lid on
it. Yeah, you can put a security freeze on your credit files and get an
unpublished phone number and have all your mail sent to a PO box instead
of a street address and all that shit, but that only plugs the most
obvious leaks. Some greedy prick business is still gonna sell your data
to some other prick business at some point -- there's no way to stop
that. Or some dumbass in a bank or something is going to inadvertenly
leak your info somehow -- there's no way to stop that, either. If you
find out who fucked up you can scream about lawsuits and stuff, but that
won't put the genie back in the bottle.

>>> I don't expect he'll get much further than the
>>> last two fuckheads, but he can always give it a whirl.
>>
>> Failure doesn't phase him.
>
> No shit.

Too bad "failure" describes probably 98% of everything he's ever done.

 

NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking:
> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady eye,
>> and foamed wildly:
>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in thee
>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had you
>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since everyone
>>>>>> else ignores him.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be sure.
>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>
>>>><snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess The
>>>>Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes, Atlas Bugged
> or
>>>>TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>
>>>>...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your ass so
>>>>hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging, therapy-proof
>>>>obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>
>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>
>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>
> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this article
> (give or take an hour).
>
>
> Fun Stats
>
> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2 just
> plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in use, 2 just
> suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1
> Stern warnings received: 1
> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55 (rough
> guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess)
> Longest "break" period: 3 months
> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under single
> nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under multiple
> nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms)
> - Of which 4 were "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie"
> Strangest campaign: comp.lang.c
> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most out-of-control
> campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign: rec.pets.cats *and*
> sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign: rec.nude
> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless

OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom, but there is good reason
to second this. Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry which he
refuses to acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to anyone
familiar with his other nyms; unsupported bragging about trolling under
other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to still be, for that
matter), not just one, but *four* different kookologists (which would
render him immune to such a nomination as this, BTW, if true -- should he
come clean later, I have no doubt he can get any kook awards he may win in
the meantime overturned, but as long as he's just making a claim without
backing it up...Well, that's kooky, moronic, and pretty damned stupid);
and essentially painting himself as someone who can do kookology better
than AUK, while at the same time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off
his l33t kookological skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky, hereby
nominate ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk
(the only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his, specifically because
they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because we're
so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK (because he's
so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make any sense to me,
either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo Memorial Pathetic Anal
Pineapple.

Seconds?

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.
"The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course,
an automatic weapon."

Official Chung Demon

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4.3223@bignews3.bellsouth.net>

I mourned:
> The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
>> DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!
>>
>> the oversized check is in the mail.
>
> Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl shit
> under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: <77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05>

Said I:
> You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
> who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: <gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01>

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:
<45e625dd$0$16280$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4aps7a68k0s9stn2e4i@4ax.com>

"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exebuyola@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.338.19.1@news.alt.net>

"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.998087.289050@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:

Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dogfucker

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
> issue further by squeaking:
>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in thee
>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had you
>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be sure.
>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess
>>>>> The Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes,
>>>>> Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked.
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your
>>>>> ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>> therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>>
>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>
>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>
>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
>> article (give or take an hour).
>>
>>
>> Fun Stats
>>
>> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
>> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
>> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in
>> use, 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1
>> Stern warnings received: 1
>> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
>> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
>> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
>> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
>> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess)
>> Longest "break" period: 3 months
>> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
>> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
>> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
>> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms)
>> - Of which 4 were "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie"
>> Strangest campaign: comp.lang.c
>> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
>> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
>> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
>> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
>> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign: rec.nude
>> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>
> OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,

It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.

> but there is good
> reason to second this.

No there isn't.

> Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry
> which he refuses to acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to
> anyone familiar with his other nyms;

None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
posting style.

> unsupported bragging about
> trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to still
> be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different kookologists
> (which would render him immune to such a nomination as this, BTW, if
> true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt he can get any
> kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned, but as long as
> he's just making a claim without backing it up...Well, that's kooky,
> moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and essentially painting himself
> as someone who can do kookology better than AUK, while at the same
> time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off his l33t kookological
> skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky, hereby nominate
> ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
> only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,

<shakes head>

> specifically because
> they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
> common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
> we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
> (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
> any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
> Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>
> Seconds?

Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

Hail Eris! On Jun 21, 3:51?am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" wrote:
> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
> > issue further by squeaking:
> >> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
> >>> eye, and foamed wildly:
> >>>> gregvk wrote:
> >>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in thee
> >>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>
> >>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had you
> >>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
> >>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>
> >>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be sure.
> >>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>
> >>>>> <snicker> ?Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess
> >>>>> The Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes,
> >>>>> Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked.
> >>>>> LOL
>
> >>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your
> >>>>> ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
> >>>>> therapy-proof obsession. ?It might be good for a few laughs.
>
> >>>> Yes! ?Feel your *anger*!
>
> >>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>
> >> To me. ?10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
> >> article (give or take an hour).
>
> >> Fun Stats
>
> >> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
> >> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
> >> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in
> >> use, 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1
> >> Stern warnings received: 1
> >> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
> >> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
> >> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
> >> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
> >> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess)
> >> Longest "break" period: 3 months
> >> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
> >> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
> >> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
> >> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms)
> >> ?- Of which 4 were "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie"
> >> Strangest campaign: comp.lang.c
> >> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
> >> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
> >> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
> >> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
> >> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign: rec.nude
> >> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>
> > OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,
>
> It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.

Meaning, you think he has somehow managed to spank me, at some point.
Opinion noted, and laughed at.

> > but there is good reason to second this.
>
> No there isn't.

Yes there is.

> > Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry
> > which he refuses to acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to
> > anyone familiar with his other nyms;
>
> None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
> proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
> posting style.

The obsession with AUK which they all share is another, plus the need
to prove themselves superior to the kookologists of AUK by kicking
around the k00ks "better" than we(tinw) can -- if it's not the same
person, then it's all the same group of Encyclopedia Dramatica trolls,
which is the same fucking diff. One jealous homophobic twit or a gang
of them, it makes no odds. They deserve the same level of respect,
either way.

> > unsupported bragging about
> > trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to still
> > be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different kookologists
> > (which would render him immune to such a nomination as this, BTW, if
> > true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt he can get any
> > kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned, but as long as
> > he's just making a claim without backing it up...Well, that's kooky,
> > moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and essentially painting himself
> > as someone who can do kookology better than AUK, while at the same
> > time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off his l33t kookological
> > skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky, hereby nominate
> > ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
> > only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,
>
> <shakes head>

If he's not who and what I say, he can bloody well out himself. Or
else he can win awards. Wev. It's entirely up to him. Or her. Running
a long troll has its risks. OTOH, his latest homophobic spewage
doesn't seem to me like something you would support, Rhonda, nor does
it seem worthy of a kookologist, but never mind. A PAP could be
overturned; however, if he wins a BUA, all bets are off. Then, even if
he does out himself afterward, you might just see an historic event: A
kookologist, possibly even a HoT winner, being stripped of hir
honours. I strongly advise him to end the troll now, before he plays
chicken with his "official" rep, if he does have one.

But if he wants to play, I'm willing to play too.

> > specifically because
> > they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
> > common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
> > we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
> > (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
> > any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
> > Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>
> > Seconds?
>
> Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.

It is not, however, malformed, nor is it composed of quotes from my
own posts. None of my .sigs are. Hence, you may whine some more.
Fluffy appreciates it.

Snarky

 

Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:13:21 +0000, gregvk wrote:

> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
> news:pan.2008.06.20.15.25.54.574385@netscape.net:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:01:50 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>
>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>> news:pan.2008.06.19.14.51.44.279078@netscape.net:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:16 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.18.15.42.33.174120@netscape.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:21:36 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.17.15.04.55.465134@netscape.net:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:09:51 +0000, spooge wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:150620082031179511%erfc-1024@usa.net:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> spooge <spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns9ABDEC4697438A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
>>>>> <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> newsan.2008.06.15.02.38.34.652092
>>>>>>> @ia.ia.nngh.yog.sothoth.neblod.zin
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>> beady
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sat in thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either St.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jackanapes,
>>>>>>> Atlas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bugged
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your
>>>>>>> ass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on
>>>>>>>>>>>> this article (give or take an hour).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>-snipped-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Lies, damned lies and statistics.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lies posted to usenet? I am *shocked*.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Indeed, alt.* is going to hell in a hand-basket.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Verizon decided to become pussies and stop carrying the alt.*
>>>>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Verizon sucks. Get credo mobile, fyi.
>>>>>
>>>>> The larger an organization gets, the more they suck. (This seems
>>>>> to be especially true of banks, phone companies and ISPs.) Always
>>>>> do business with small-to-medium size businesses, if you can.
>>>>>
>>>> Yeap.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Details on /.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No Verizon users? No loss. ...Let's hope a few other ISPs
>>>>>>> follow
>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You dont want playmates on teh usernets?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They can still use NSPs. NSP users are less likely to be whining
>>>>> fuckheads, anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Lets all give Gary and Chris some biz
>>>
>>> They can have all the people who think $5 (or more) per mo for Usenet
>>> is actually a good deal.
>>
>> It takes a bit of shopping to get FREE.
>> Or just search www.newzbot.com
>
> The problem with free providers is that you aren't worth anything to them.
> They have no incentive to keep you happy. Hell, they don't have any
> incentive to even keep your account open.

Sure its like free software or anything else: if yas dont like it dont
complain

--
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/15381

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> Hail Eris! On Jun 21, 3:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" wrote:
>> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
>>> issue further by squeaking:
>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in
>>>>>>>> thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking
>>>>>>>> Muche Tea:
>>
>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had
>>>>>>>>> you figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>
>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be
>>>>>>>> sure. <jitter> he is, then.
>>
>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess
>>>>>>> The Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes,
>>>>>>> Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you
>>>>>>> asked. LOL
>>
>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your
>>>>>>> ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>> therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>
>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>
>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>
>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
>>>> article (give or take an hour).
>>
>>>> Fun Stats
>>
>>>> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
>>>> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
>>>> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in
>>>> use, 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1
>>>> Stern warnings received: 1
>>>> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
>>>> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
>>>> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
>>>> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
>>>> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess)
>>>> Longest "break" period: 3 months
>>>> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
>>>> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
>>>> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
>>>> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms)
>>>> - Of which 4 were "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie"
>>>> Strangest campaign: comp.lang.c
>>>> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
>>>> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
>>>> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
>>>> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
>>>> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign:
>>>> rec.nude Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>>
>>> OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,
>>
>> It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.
>
> Meaning, you think he has somehow managed to spank me, at some point.
> Opinion noted, and laughed at.

I agreed with your surmise. What more can you ask?

>>> but there is good reason to second this.
>>
>> No there isn't.
>
> Yes there is.

Okay.

>>> Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry
>>> which he refuses to acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent
>>> to anyone familiar with his other nyms;
>>
>> None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
>> proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
>> posting style.
>
> The obsession with AUK which they all share is another, plus the need
> to prove themselves superior to the kookologists of AUK by kicking
> around the k00ks "better" than we(tinw) can -- if it's not the same
> person, then it's all the same group of Encyclopedia Dramatica trolls,
> which is the same fucking diff.

Meaning: "I have no idea but this is truthy enough."

> One jealous homophobic twit or a gang
> of them, it makes no odds. They deserve the same level of respect,
> either way.

<shakes head>

>>> unsupported bragging about
>>> trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to
>>> still be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different
>>> kookologists (which would render him immune to such a nomination as
>>> this, BTW, if true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt
>>> he can get any kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned,
>>> but as long as he's just making a claim without backing it
>>> up...Well, that's kooky, moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and
>>> essentially painting himself as someone who can do kookology better
>>> than AUK, while at the same time attacking AUK, in addition to
>>> showing off his l33t kookological skillz -- for all these reasons
>>> do I, Snarky, hereby nominate
>>> ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
>>> only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,
>>
>> <shakes head>
>
> If he's not who and what I say, he can bloody well out himself.

Because you said so?

> Or
> else he can win awards.

My best guess is that will be satisfactory, but I can't say for sure.

> Wev. It's entirely up to him. Or her. Running
> a long troll has its risks. OTOH, his latest homophobic spewage
> doesn't seem to me like something you would support, Rhonda, nor does
> it seem worthy of a kookologist, but never mind.

Did you actually look at those posts?

And even assuming he did make those posts, what is it that makes one
troll more acceptable to you than another? All trolls must be
politically correct? They must not offend your specific sensibilities?
What?

> A PAP could be
> overturned; however, if he wins a BUA, all bets are off. Then, even if
> he does out himself afterward,

I sincerely doubt there's going to be any outing. I don't think s/he
will out her/himself, and I don't think there's anyone who actually
knows who s/he is.

I just know for a fact who s/he isn't--several times over, albeit with
more proof in some cases than others--so it does limit the
possibilities.

> you might just see an historic event: A
> kookologist, possibly even a HoT winner, being stripped of hir
> honours. I strongly advise him to end the troll now, before he plays
> chicken with his "official" rep, if he does have one.

For someone who doesn't take usenet seriously, you sure take this pretty
seriously.

> But if he wants to play, I'm willing to play too.
>
>>> specifically because
>>> they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
>>> common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
>>> we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
>>> (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
>>> any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
>>> Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>>
>>> Seconds?
>>
>> Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.
>
> It is not, however, malformed, nor is it composed of quotes from my
> own posts. None of my .sigs are. Hence, you may whine some more.
> Fluffy appreciates it.

You have more personal exceptions for doing yourself what you nominate
others for than anyone I know.

I'm done, Snarky. Have at it.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

 

Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
news:pan.2008.06.21.15.19.38.751292@netscape.net:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:13:21 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>
>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>> news:pan.2008.06.20.15.25.54.574385@netscape.net:
>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:01:50 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>
>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>> news:pan.2008.06.19.14.51.44.279078@netscape.net:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:06:16 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.18.15.42.33.174120@netscape.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:21:36 +0000, gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ???hw?f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:pan.2008.06.17.15.04.55.465134@netscape.net:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:09:51 +0000, spooge wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:150620082031179511%erfc-1024@usa.net:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> spooge <spooge@petitmorteREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns9ABDEC4697438A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
>>>>>> <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newsan.2008.06.15.02.38.34.652092
>>>>>>>> @ia.ia.nngh.yog.sothoth.neblod.zin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>> beady
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sat in thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>> sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of Guess The Troll. After the last round I was either
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>St. Jackanapes,
>>>>>>>> Atlas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bugged
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>kicked your
>>>>>>>> ass
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>laughs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this article (give or take an hour).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>-snipped-
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Lies, damned lies and statistics.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lies posted to usenet? I am *shocked*.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, alt.* is going to hell in a hand-basket.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Verizon decided to become pussies and stop carrying the alt.*
>>>>>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Verizon sucks. Get credo mobile, fyi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The larger an organization gets, the more they suck. (This seems
>>>>>> to be especially true of banks, phone companies and ISPs.)
>>>>>> Always do business with small-to-medium size businesses, if you
>>>>>> can.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeap.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Details on /.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No Verizon users? No loss. ...Let's hope a few other ISPs
>>>>>>>> follow
>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You dont want playmates on teh usernets?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They can still use NSPs. NSP users are less likely to be whining
>>>>>> fuckheads, anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets all give Gary and Chris some biz
>>>>
>>>> They can have all the people who think $5 (or more) per mo for
>>>> Usenet is actually a good deal.
>>>
>>> It takes a bit of shopping to get FREE.
>>> Or just search www.newzbot.com
>>
>> The problem with free providers is that you aren't worth anything to
>> them. They have no incentive to keep you happy. Hell, they don't
>> have any incentive to even keep your account open.
>
> Sure its like free software or anything else: if yas dont like it dont
> complain

But complaining is fun. And if you're lucky you'll piss somebody off and
make them do something they'll regret for years and years. LOL

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

Hail Eris! On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:21:29 -0400, Eris Kallisti Discordia was
laughing at the antics of Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, when they suddenly burst
out in tears:
> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>> Hail Eris! On Jun 21, 3:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" wrote:
>>> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
>>>> issue further by squeaking:
>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in thee
>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had you
>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be sure.
>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>
>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess The
>>>>>>>> Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes, Atlas
>>>>>>>> Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>
>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your ass
>>>>>>>> so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>> therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>
>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>
>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>
>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
>>>>> article (give or take an hour).
>>>
>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>
>>>>> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
>>>>> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
>>>>> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in use,
>>>>> 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1 Stern
>>>>> warnings received: 1
>>>>> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
>>>>> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
>>>>> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
>>>>> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
>>>>> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess) Longest "break"
>>>>> period: 3 months
>>>>> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
>>>>> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
>>>>> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
>>>>> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms) - Of which 4 were
>>>>> "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie" Strangest campaign:
>>>>> comp.lang.c
>>>>> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
>>>>> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
>>>>> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
>>>>> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
>>>>> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign: rec.nude
>>>>> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>>>
>>>> OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,
>>>
>>> It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.
>>
>> Meaning, you think he has somehow managed to spank me, at some point.
>> Opinion noted, and laughed at.
>
> I agreed with your surmise. What more can you ask?

Ha. Ha.

>>>> but there is good reason to second this.
>>>
>>> No there isn't.
>>
>> Yes there is.
>
> Okay.
>
>>>> Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry which he refuses to
>>>> acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to anyone familiar with
>>>> his other nyms;
>>>
>>> None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
>>> proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
>>> posting style.
>>
>> The obsession with AUK which they all share is another, plus the need to
>> prove themselves superior to the kookologists of AUK by kicking around
>> the k00ks "better" than we(tinw) can -- if it's not the same person,
>> then it's all the same group of Encyclopedia Dramatica trolls, which is
>> the same fucking diff.
>
> Meaning: "I have no idea but this is truthy enough."

He's not exactly been sufficiently distinctive in his personality, over
all those nyms, to be definitively one or the other.

>> One jealous homophobic twit or a gang of them, it makes no odds. They
>> deserve the same level of respect, either way.
>
> <shakes head>

You may disagree, but you're net.dead.;-{P}

>>>> unsupported bragging about
>>>> trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to still
>>>> be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different kookologists
>>>> (which would render him immune to such a nomination as this, BTW, if
>>>> true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt he can get any
>>>> kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned, but as long as he's
>>>> just making a claim without backing it up...Well, that's kooky,
>>>> moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and essentially painting himself
>>>> as someone who can do kookology better than AUK, while at the same
>>>> time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off his l33t kookological
>>>> skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky, hereby nominate
>>>> ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
>>>> only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,
>>>
>>> <shakes head>
>>
>> If he's not who and what I say, he can bloody well out himself.
>
> Because you said so?

Because I'm nominating him *now* -- he's kept this one nym long enough to
become memorable, and he most definitely has been trying to be both an
independent kookologist and a superior one to all of AUK, which would fit
with the ED (q.v. 36 lines up) observation made to me regarding him awhile
back. The ED has its own form of kookology, one far more agreeable to
right-wingers and homophobes, and he exemplifies it. It's not a form that
goes over well with AUK, though. I know that because multiple kookologists
in AUK (possibly all, by now) have expressed one level of disapproval of
him or another, in the past two years.

>> Or else he can win awards.
>
> My best guess is that will be satisfactory, but I can't say for sure.

If he wants a few awards, he can have them.

>> Wev. It's entirely up to him. Or her. Running a long troll has its
>> risks. OTOH, his latest homophobic spewage doesn't seem to me like
>> something you would support, Rhonda, nor does it seem worthy of a
>> kookologist, but never mind.
>
> Did you actually look at those posts?

I did. He claims to switch newsreaders, operating systems, internet
providers, news providers, and posting styles a lot, so if he's switched
to motzarella some of the time, so what? If he's being frogged (he can't
be forged), how can you or anyone tell? He has the anonymity he desires.
If he doesn't like it, he can out himself. Giving him "the benefit of the
doubt" would be silly, since he's as good as said he doesn't want it.

> And even assuming he did make those posts, what is it that makes one troll
> more acceptable to you than another? All trolls must be politically
> correct? They must not offend your specific sensibilities? What?

Hardly. Craig Chilton's a k00k, too. No, if you want to see my criteria,
check the FAQ and the Kook Test (and add "homophobia" where appropriate).
"Jes' trollin'" doesn't make one immune to being a k00k. Knowing when to
stop would be another matter.

>> A PAP could be
>> overturned; however, if he wins a BUA, all bets are off. Then, even if
>> he does out himself afterward,
>
> I sincerely doubt there's going to be any outing. I don't think s/he will
> out her/himself, and I don't think there's anyone who actually knows who
> s/he is.

Fine. I have no problem with it.

> I just know for a fact who s/he isn't--several times over, albeit with
> more proof in some cases than others--so it does limit the possibilities.

I don't really care, at this point.

>> you might just see an historic event: A kookologist, possibly even a HoT
>> winner, being stripped of hir honours. I strongly advise him to end the
>> troll now, before he plays chicken with his "official" rep, if he does
>> have one.
>
> For someone who doesn't take usenet seriously, you sure take this pretty
> seriously.

GREATER POOP: Are you really serious or what?
MAL-2: Sometimes I take humor seriously. Sometimes I take seriousness
humorously. Either way it is irrelevant.

The man speaks sooth.

>> But if he wants to play, I'm willing to play too.
>>
>>>> specifically because
>>>> they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
>>>> common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
>>>> we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
>>>> (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
>>>> any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
>>>> Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>>>
>>>> Seconds?
>>>
>>> Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.
>>
>> It is not, however, malformed, nor is it composed of quotes from my own
>> posts. None of my .sigs are. Hence, you may whine some more. Fluffy
>> appreciates it.
>
> You have more personal exceptions for doing yourself what you nominate
> others for than anyone I know.
>
> I'm done, Snarky. Have at it.

<charges forth>

--
________________________________________________________________________
PorscheMonkey4Life COOSN-029-06-71069; Lits Slut #16
Butcher Knife Natalia; Gutter Chix0r #17; AUK Psycho & Felon #21
BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4; Parrot & Zombie #2
Usenet Ruiner #5; Top Asshole #3; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
No holy posting of any kind, to email.
"It can't rain all the time"

"this brain stem cannot leave well enough alone." -- Lady Veteran has
been demonstrating this truth for many years. Her honesty is refreshing.
Message-ID: <e62224t05er85vvpe1r3u2dhoebjv1p3vg@4ax.com>

"FAILED BULLSHITBOYS WHOSE CANDY HAS NO RED ON IT! YOU KNOW IT TO BE
TRUE! I LICKED THE RED OFF YOUR CANDY BECAUSE YOU ARE YOUR ILK HAVEN'T
GOT ANY FURY!" -- Gibbered by Johnny in Message-ID:
<qiA3k.2556$Xe.1871@bignews1.bellsouth.net>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
<33km2419sg6fnq3shtbatqa602eagfbskl@4ax.com>

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<HMb3k.2413$bh5.2204@bignews4.bellsouth.net>

http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Xander: "I still don't get why we had to come here to get info about a
killer snot monster."
Giles: "Because it's a killer snot monster from outer space. (pause) I
did not say that." -- "Listening to Fear" (87/509), Buffy the Vampire
Slayer
"Actually, I quit. Nobody takes my frock." -- Captain Jack, "The Doctor
Dances" (27.10), Doctor Who

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
The MonkeyLJ: http://porchmonkey.livejournal.com/ -- nuked!

8. OK, so who's this "Dev McKinHole", then?

I dunno, some guy named Devon McKinnon of Dawson Creek, allegedly, and
according to the Monkey, a pedophile. However, I wouldn't take that too
seriously. The Monkey keeps changing his mind about who I am, so there's
no reason to think he won't change it about Mr. McKinnon, too.

"I am mentally stable, fool...I am going to be a bishop's wife." -- Sure
you are, Olympiada. MID: <45e21b75$0$16373$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>

"yes you are definitely retarded. See a neurologist immediate. And if
you don't have monet, blow a neurologist immediately." -- Farky the
Monkey-man to peachy ashie passion. No, no trace of irony in his post.
MID: <4h6xh.802$hH2.233@trnddc02>

"I was told there would be cookies."
Cross-Poasters For Goddess!
Remember: Straight people can't help it!
A petition to make the Five-Fingered Hand of Eris
the official symbol for the planet Eris:
http://www.petitiononline.com/ffhoeris/

"If you don't have pedicures AT LEAST every two weeks, don't talk to me.
If you don't floss every night and morning and brush at least twice a
day, don't talk to me. If you don't spend money on you hair and get
great cuts and color, don't talk to me. If you are heavy, don't talk to
me. If you don't shower every morning and take a nice bubble bath every
night, don't talk to me. If you don't have a loved one in your arms,
don't talk to me. If you don't keep an immaculate house, don't talk to
me. If you don't work, don't talk to me." -- Clearly, Martha Vandella
never wants to talk to me, which is for the best, really.
MID: <1161934857.062934.91900@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

"You're fighting a Furry Giant

"He delivers a long speech about how you shouldn't judge him just because
he's an animal deep down inside and you're all intolerant and dressing up
like an animal in easy-access furry pants doesn't make you a pervert...
you fall asleep halfway through." -- The Kingdom of Loathing

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a stalker.

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and Yardwork
<mhm29x21@meeeeooooooowwww.flonk> wrote:
>Hail Eris! On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:21:29 -0400, Eris Kallisti Discordia was
>laughing at the antics of Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, when they suddenly burst
>out in tears:
>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>> Hail Eris! On Jun 21, 3:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" wrote:
>>>> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
>>>>> issue further by squeaking:
>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in thee
>>>>>>>>>> Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had you
>>>>>>>>>>> figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be sure.
>>>>>>>>>> <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess The
>>>>>>>>> Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes, Atlas
>>>>>>>>> Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you asked. LOL
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your ass
>>>>>>>>> so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>> therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>
>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
>>>>>> article (give or take an hour).
>>>>
>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>
>>>>>> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
>>>>>> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
>>>>>> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in use,
>>>>>> 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1 Stern
>>>>>> warnings received: 1
>>>>>> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
>>>>>> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
>>>>>> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
>>>>>> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
>>>>>> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess) Longest "break"
>>>>>> period: 3 months
>>>>>> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
>>>>>> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
>>>>>> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
>>>>>> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms) - Of which 4 were
>>>>>> "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie" Strangest campaign:
>>>>>> comp.lang.c
>>>>>> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
>>>>>> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
>>>>>> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
>>>>>> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
>>>>>> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign: rec.nude
>>>>>> Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>>>>
>>>>> OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,
>>>>
>>>> It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.
>>>
>>> Meaning, you think he has somehow managed to spank me, at some point.
>>> Opinion noted, and laughed at.
>>
>> I agreed with your surmise. What more can you ask?
>
>Ha. Ha.
>
>>>>> but there is good reason to second this.
>>>>
>>>> No there isn't.
>>>
>>> Yes there is.
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>>>>> Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry which he refuses to
>>>>> acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to anyone familiar with
>>>>> his other nyms;
>>>>
>>>> None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
>>>> proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
>>>> posting style.
>>>
>>> The obsession with AUK which they all share is another, plus the need to
>>> prove themselves superior to the kookologists of AUK by kicking around
>>> the k00ks "better" than we(tinw) can -- if it's not the same person,
>>> then it's all the same group of Encyclopedia Dramatica trolls, which is
>>> the same fucking diff.
>>
>> Meaning: "I have no idea but this is truthy enough."
>
>He's not exactly been sufficiently distinctive in his personality, over
>all those nyms, to be definitively one or the other.
>
>>> One jealous homophobic twit or a gang of them, it makes no odds. They
>>> deserve the same level of respect, either way.
>>
>> <shakes head>
>
>You may disagree, but you're net.dead.;-{P}
>
>>>>> unsupported bragging about
>>>>> trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to still
>>>>> be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different kookologists
>>>>> (which would render him immune to such a nomination as this, BTW, if
>>>>> true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt he can get any
>>>>> kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned, but as long as he's
>>>>> just making a claim without backing it up...Well, that's kooky,
>>>>> moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and essentially painting himself
>>>>> as someone who can do kookology better than AUK, while at the same
>>>>> time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off his l33t kookological
>>>>> skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky, hereby nominate
>>>>> ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
>>>>> only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,
>>>>
>>>> <shakes head>
>>>
>>> If he's not who and what I say, he can bloody well out himself.
>>
>> Because you said so?
>
>Because I'm nominating him *now* -- he's kept this one nym long enough to
>become memorable, and he most definitely has been trying to be both an
>independent kookologist and a superior one to all of AUK, which would fit
>with the ED (q.v. 36 lines up) observation made to me regarding him awhile
>back. The ED has its own form of kookology, one far more agreeable to
>right-wingers and homophobes, and he exemplifies it. It's not a form that
>goes over well with AUK, though. I know that because multiple kookologists
>in AUK (possibly all, by now) have expressed one level of disapproval of
>him or another, in the past two years.
>
>>> Or else he can win awards.
>>
>> My best guess is that will be satisfactory, but I can't say for sure.
>
>If he wants a few awards, he can have them.
>
>>> Wev. It's entirely up to him. Or her. Running a long troll has its
>>> risks. OTOH, his latest homophobic spewage doesn't seem to me like
>>> something you would support, Rhonda, nor does it seem worthy of a
>>> kookologist, but never mind.
>>
>> Did you actually look at those posts?
>
>I did. He claims to switch newsreaders, operating systems, internet
>providers, news providers, and posting styles a lot, so if he's switched
>to motzarella some of the time, so what? If he's being frogged (he can't
>be forged), how can you or anyone tell? He has the anonymity he desires.
>If he doesn't like it, he can out himself. Giving him "the benefit of the
>doubt" would be silly, since he's as good as said he doesn't want it.
>
>> And even assuming he did make those posts, what is it that makes one troll
>> more acceptable to you than another? All trolls must be politically
>> correct? They must not offend your specific sensibilities? What?
>
>Hardly. Craig Chilton's a k00k, too. No, if you want to see my criteria,
>check the FAQ and the Kook Test (and add "homophobia" where appropriate).
>"Jes' trollin'" doesn't make one immune to being a k00k. Knowing when to
>stop would be another matter.
>
>>> A PAP could be
>>> overturned; however, if he wins a BUA, all bets are off. Then, even if
>>> he does out himself afterward,
>>
>> I sincerely doubt there's going to be any outing. I don't think s/he will
>> out her/himself, and I don't think there's anyone who actually knows who
>> s/he is.
>
>Fine. I have no problem with it.
>
>> I just know for a fact who s/he isn't--several times over, albeit with
>> more proof in some cases than others--so it does limit the possibilities.
>
>I don't really care, at this point.
>
>>> you might just see an historic event: A kookologist, possibly even a HoT
>>> winner, being stripped of hir honours. I strongly advise him to end the
>>> troll now, before he plays chicken with his "official" rep, if he does
>>> have one.
>>
>> For someone who doesn't take usenet seriously, you sure take this pretty
>> seriously.
>
>GREATER POOP: Are you really serious or what?
>MAL-2: Sometimes I take humor seriously. Sometimes I take seriousness
>humorously. Either way it is irrelevant.
>
>The man speaks sooth.
>
>>> But if he wants to play, I'm willing to play too.
>>>
>>>>> specifically because
>>>>> they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
>>>>> common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
>>>>> we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
>>>>> (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
>>>>> any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
>>>>> Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>>>>
>>>>> Seconds?
>>>>
>>>> Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.
>>>
>>> It is not, however, malformed, nor is it composed of quotes from my own
>>> posts. None of my .sigs are. Hence, you may whine some more. Fluffy
>>> appreciates it.
>>
>> You have more personal exceptions for doing yourself what you nominate
>> others for than anyone I know.
>>
>> I'm done, Snarky. Have at it.
>
><charges forth>

These kookwhines from Rhon-duh are APPROVED.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

 

Re: NOMINATION: PAP Re: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:59:37 -0600, Art Deco did most oddly state:
> Synthetic Networked Android Responsible for Killing and Yardwork
> wrote:
>>Hail Eris! On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:21:29 -0400, Eris Kallisti Discordia
>>was laughing at the antics of Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries, when they suddenly
>>burst out in tears:
>>> The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>>> Hail Eris! On Jun 21, 3:51 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" wrote:
>>>>> Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 05:14:14 +0000, gregvk attempted to confuse the
>>>>>> issue further by squeaking:
>>>>>>> The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:26:27 -0600, Art Deco fixed me with a beady
>>>>>>>> eye, and foamed wildly:
>>>>>>>>> gregvk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:40:42 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet sat in
>>>>>>>>>>> thee Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking
>>>>>>>>>>> Muche Tea:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It took you this long to figure out who he really is? I had
>>>>>>>>>>>> you figured for knowing it was #@$# #@^%$*@! right away since
>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone else ignores him.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was away for over a year, effectively, so I wanted to be
>>>>>>>>>>> sure. <jitter> he is, then.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <snicker> Aaaaah, there's nothing like a rousing game of Guess
>>>>>>>>>> The Troll. After the last round I was either St. Jackanapes,
>>>>>>>>>> Atlas Bugged or TheApostle depending on which spankard you
>>>>>>>>>> asked. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...Come on, now, list all the people who have ever kicked your
>>>>>>>>>> ass so hard as to induce permanent butthurt and a raging,
>>>>>>>>>> therapy-proof obsession. It might be good for a few laughs.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes! Feel your *anger*!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'Sfunny -- I not only don't know who he really is
>>>>>
>>>>>>> To me. 10 years of trolling Usenet, as of the timestamp on this
>>>>>>> article (give or take an hour).
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fun Stats
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Newsgroups tormented: 15-20 (rough guess) Newsgroups caught in the
>>>>>>> crosspost-fire: 30-40 (rough guess) ISPs used: 5 (2 disappeared, 2
>>>>>>> just plain suck, currently using fifth) NSPs used: 7 (3 still in
>>>>>>> use, 2 just suck, 1 too greedy, 1 bannination) Accounts TOSsed: 1
>>>>>>> Stern warnings received: 1
>>>>>>> Really whiny "warnings" received: 2
>>>>>>> Computers that shit the bed: 1 tower, 2 laptops, 1 (ancient) mini
>>>>>>> Newsreaders tried that sucked: 4
>>>>>>> Newsreaders tried that actually worked: 2 Short-lived nyms: 45-55
>>>>>>> (rough guess) Long-lived nyms: 5-8 (rough guess) Longest "break"
>>>>>>> period: 3 months
>>>>>>> Newsgroups more-or-less wrecked: 1
>>>>>>> Half dead groups more-or-less resuscitated: 1 Record campaign under
>>>>>>> single nym: 3 years, alt.religion.christian.* Record campaign under
>>>>>>> multiple nyms: 3 years, alt.usenet.kooks (9 nyms) - Of which 4 were
>>>>>>> "kookologists" and 2 were believed to be "BowTie" Strangest
>>>>>>> campaign: comp.lang.c
>>>>>>> Meanest campaign: alt.cuddle
>>>>>>> Easiest campaign: alt.christnet.prayer Most intense campaign:
>>>>>>> alt.law-enforcement.traffic (216 posts in an hour) Most
>>>>>>> out-of-control campaign: rec.motorcycles Most difficult campaign:
>>>>>>> rec.pets.cats *and* sci.med (tie) Most disgusting campaign:
>>>>>>> rec.nude Dumbasses who just HAD to bite the hook: Countless
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, I realise this may seem like a revenge nom,
>>>>>
>>>>> It does, but I'm sure you'll get a second anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Meaning, you think he has somehow managed to spank me, at some point.
>>>> Opinion noted, and laughed at.
>>>
>>> I agreed with your surmise. What more can you ask?
>>
>>Ha. Ha.
>>
>>>>>> but there is good reason to second this.
>>>>>
>>>>> No there isn't.
>>>>
>>>> Yes there is.
>>>
>>> Okay.
>>>
>>>>>> Roughly two years or more of sock-puppetry which he refuses to
>>>>>> acknowledge, though it's perfectly transparent to anyone familiar
>>>>>> with his other nyms;
>>>>>
>>>>> None of which he has claimed, and none of which you have a shred of
>>>>> proof for but a "feeling" based on what you insist is a similarity of
>>>>> posting style.
>>>>
>>>> The obsession with AUK which they all share is another, plus the need
>>>> to prove themselves superior to the kookologists of AUK by kicking
>>>> around the k00ks "better" than we(tinw) can -- if it's not the same
>>>> person, then it's all the same group of Encyclopedia Dramatica trolls,
>>>> which is the same fucking diff.
>>>
>>> Meaning: "I have no idea but this is truthy enough."
>>
>>He's not exactly been sufficiently distinctive in his personality, over
>>all those nyms, to be definitively one or the other.
>>
>>>> One jealous homophobic twit or a gang of them, it makes no odds. They
>>>> deserve the same level of respect, either way.
>>>
>>> <shakes head>
>>
>>You may disagree, but you're net.dead.;-{P}
>>
>>>>>> unsupported bragging about
>>>>>> trolling under other unnamed nyms; claiming to have been (or to
>>>>>> still be, for that matter), not just one, but *four* different
>>>>>> kookologists (which would render him immune to such a nomination as
>>>>>> this, BTW, if true -- should he come clean later, I have no doubt he
>>>>>> can get any kook awards he may win in the meantime overturned, but
>>>>>> as long as he's just making a claim without backing it up...Well,
>>>>>> that's kooky, moronic, and pretty damned stupid); and essentially
>>>>>> painting himself as someone who can do kookology better than AUK,
>>>>>> while at the same time attacking AUK, in addition to showing off his
>>>>>> l33t kookological skillz -- for all these reasons do I, Snarky,
>>>>>> hereby nominate
>>>>>> ansermetniam/annedpink/purpurroterwald/jitter/malscribe/gregvk (the
>>>>>> only nyms which I'm confident in naming as his,
>>>>>
>>>>> <shakes head>
>>>>
>>>> If he's not who and what I say, he can bloody well out himself.
>>>
>>> Because you said so?
>>
>>Because I'm nominating him *now* -- he's kept this one nym long enough to
>>become memorable, and he most definitely has been trying to be both an
>>independent kookologist and a superior one to all of AUK, which would fit
>>with the ED (q.v. 36 lines up) observation made to me regarding him
>>awhile back. The ED has its own form of kookology, one far more agreeable
>>to right-wingers and homophobes, and he exemplifies it. It's not a form
>>that goes over well with AUK, though. I know that because multiple
>>kookologists in AUK (possibly all, by now) have expressed one level of
>>disapproval of him or another, in the past two years.
>>
>>>> Or else he can win awards.
>>>
>>> My best guess is that will be satisfactory, but I can't say for sure.
>>
>>If he wants a few awards, he can have them.
>>
>>>> Wev. It's entirely up to him. Or her. Running a long troll has its
>>>> risks. OTOH, his latest homophobic spewage doesn't seem to me like
>>>> something you would support, Rhonda, nor does it seem worthy of a
>>>> kookologist, but never mind.
>>>
>>> Did you actually look at those posts?
>>
>>I did. He claims to switch newsreaders, operating systems, internet
>>providers, news providers, and posting styles a lot, so if he's switched
>>to motzarella some of the time, so what? If he's being frogged (he can't
>>be forged), how can you or anyone tell? He has the anonymity he desires.
>>If he doesn't like it, he can out himself. Giving him "the benefit of the
>>doubt" would be silly, since he's as good as said he doesn't want it.
>>
>>> And even assuming he did make those posts, what is it that makes one
>>> troll more acceptable to you than another? All trolls must be
>>> politically correct? They must not offend your specific sensibilities?
>>> What?
>>
>>Hardly. Craig Chilton's a k00k, too. No, if you want to see my criteria,
>>check the FAQ and the Kook Test (and add "homophobia" where appropriate).
>>"Jes' trollin'" doesn't make one immune to being a k00k. Knowing when to
>>stop would be another matter.
>>
>>>> A PAP could be
>>>> overturned; however, if he wins a BUA, all bets are off. Then, even if
>>>> he does out himself afterward,
>>>
>>> I sincerely doubt there's going to be any outing. I don't think s/he
>>> will out her/himself, and I don't think there's anyone who actually
>>> knows who s/he is.
>>
>>Fine. I have no problem with it.
>>
>>> I just know for a fact who s/he isn't--several times over, albeit with
>>> more proof in some cases than others--so it does limit the
>>> possibilities.
>>
>>I don't really care, at this point.
>>
>>>> you might just see an historic event: A kookologist, possibly even a
>>>> HoT winner, being stripped of hir honours. I strongly advise him to
>>>> end the troll now, before he plays chicken with his "official" rep, if
>>>> he does have one.
>>>
>>> For someone who doesn't take usenet seriously, you sure take this
>>> pretty seriously.
>>
>>GREATER POOP: Are you really serious or what? MAL-2: Sometimes I take
>>humor seriously. Sometimes I take seriousness humorously. Either way it
>>is irrelevant.
>>
>>The man speaks sooth.
>>
>>>> But if he wants to play, I'm willing to play too.
>>>>
>>>>>> specifically because
>>>>>> they're mostly random strings of letters, together with the attitude
>>>>>> common to all of them that he's not going to play with AUK (because
>>>>>> we're so mean, elitist, and cliquish), while he's playing with AUK
>>>>>> (because he's so mean, elitist, and cliquish -- no, it doesn't make
>>>>>> any sense to me, either, but it _is_ his attitude)) for the Bartlo
>>>>>> Memorial Pathetic Anal Pineapple.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seconds?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your sig is more annoying than Hatter's.
>>>>
>>>> It is not, however, malformed, nor is it composed of quotes from my
>>>> own posts. None of my .sigs are. Hence, you may whine some more.
>>>> Fluffy appreciates it.
>>>
>>> You have more personal exceptions for doing yourself what you nominate
>>> others for than anyone I know.
>>>
>>> I'm done, Snarky. Have at it.
>>
>><charges forth>
>
> These kookwhines from Rhon-duh are APPROVED.

But do you second? That's the question.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #28; Usenet Ruiner #5
Demon Lord of Confusion; Official Chung Demon; Top Asshole #3
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
The posting nym is best removed from my posting address if your goal is
to speak with me in private.
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"Atheists are people who have no invisible means of support"
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

"I know how you special busboys are.
You're crazy." -- John "special busboy" Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<HMb3k.2413$bh5.2204@bignews4.bellsouth.net>

"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$XM3.20042@bignews5.bellsouth.net>

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the above k00k
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419B9HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"Right you are correct. Someone hooked me. I do believe in building
relationships. That is what Christians are required to do. I am amoral.
I am sure you know what that means. So are Scorpios. I am being
'protected' by the Formosa Rule because of my 'mental illness'. I am not
targeting 'teh Mop Jockey'. You are and you are using me as a bait.
Please stop. I have my own fish to reel in. Leave me alone. It is my hope
that I will be able to catch a fish and reel it in for you. Once my
retired bishop thought I was fishing for him and he took the bait, alas
it wasn't me and that spelled the demise of our relationship. Have a
little bit more faith in me. An Eastern Orthodox bishop thought I was
fishing for him and willingly, proudly and defiantly took the bait on
public record, and it wasn't even me. Give me a break." -- Atlanta
Olympiada "Erica" Kane yammered in
Message-ID: <ochc3.ag0.17.1@news.alt.net>

"It does to a certain extant physically and theoretically
it holds even into the quantum but there observational confirmation is
limited or non existent. That's the problem and the major stumbling
block to field unification. For Dr. Einstein held out that a physical
based field theory should be sought out and not left to quantum
uncertainty of how the universe primly base works. Man made coordinate
systems are fine without knowing from where or what is the base essence
of what the space as deduced field is composed of, but not totally
satisfactory. Anomalies keep space cropping up and scientists have to
keep adjusting for these unexpected events. It's like a blind man that
has memorized his physical surroundings to a point he feels very
comfortable until that one new or unexpected event pops up and he's lost
and fumbling." -- nightbat, in one of his more lucid moments.
Message-ID: <b27b0$45ed14a7$46e3a646$6618@COMTECK.COM>

To Whom It May Concern: Att'y Michael James Cranston stalker kook, Esq.,
is a dogfucker and Kook of the Month for March 2007