Anyone with half a brain knows that the higher the turnout the higher the percentage of liberal voters. High turnouts are not good.
Lie? I used your actual words Joe. The only lie is from you when you change from day to day what your possitions are just so you can take a shot at me my flip-flop friend, lol. Let me quote you again: Not everyone should vote. You said it Joe, now be man enough to admit it or ch!ckensh!t enough to simply run away from it, stop trying to lie your way out of it though because that is just pathetic.
We all know you couldn't have done well on the writing section of the SAT but I see you obviously didn't do very well on the critical reading part either.
Not everyone should vote.[/u Not a lot there to understand or misunderstand Joe, you said it, now your trying to sidestep taking responsibility for your own words. All I am doing is pointing out a fact that you said some people should not vote.
exactly. and he isn't denying that TJ. There is a BIG difference between 'some people should not vote' and 'some people should not be allowed to vote' BIG difference. Kinda like socialism. Yes, we should all, by choice, help out those around us in need. It's a BIG difference when the Gov't starts demanding that we have to help others, and starts taking our money to do so.
Semantics, his desire in his heart was the same, some people not voting, the execution of the desire was never the point, it is now just an excuse to try and get out of what he said. Joe in his heart believes some people should not vote, and that was my point.
So you think the ignorant morons who know nothing about any of the issues, do no research, and vote for the guy with the best hair, should be out voting? I think that's something along the lines of what IWS meant. It's kind of like driving a car with a .06 BAC. Is it legal? Technically, yes. Is it a bad idea? Probably. If you don't know what's going on, have no interest in politics, and then vote, that's not a good thing. Do they have the right to? Yes. Should they? No.
Yes, even Democrats should go out and vote. That is exactly what I was saying as well when IWS jumped me. My point was that people who don't pay taxes will never be concerned about the cost of the things they vote for. Take for example Government run healthcare. Most Americans pay little or no taxes so why not vote for people who will pass that when you know you will never have to pay for it? The only real difference between what I said and what IWS said is who said it, as usual the double standard, but it is not like this is new, I just like pointing out the hypocrisy when it appears.
As a radical libertarian I believe cocaine should be legal. I do not believe people should use it. I believe the American Communist Party has a right to exist. I do not believe people should join them. I believe you should be allowed to pick your nose in front of your date on the first date. I do not believe you should do it. It is a simple concept that only a total idiot could not understand.
Actually, semantics are pretty relevant here. He said some people should not vote. And he's quite correct. I know a few people that shouldn't vote. And they don't. Because they know they shouldn't. It's not that they don't want to. They're doing the responsible thing and not voting when they know nothing about politics and don't give a sh*t. He never said that some people should not be able to vote. Just that some people shouldn't vote. Big difference. And how do you know the desires of his heart? By reading the text he posted on the internet?
