Fox admits WTC7 demolition

Don't mean to wake the ostrichs but.....

http://wideshut.co.uk/fox-news-admi...brought-down-by-controlled-demolition-on-911/

 

I wonder why they didn't quote the next paragraph in that article:

While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was.

 

Geez dude..do I gotta put up the link with the police and firemen counting down and telling everybody to get back cause the building's going to fall? When I did, would you admit anything or would you further engage in your spin? My God...isn't there anyone who is objective in here?
We got the two members that clearly spew the propaganda...what are you supposed to be?? The backup?
Sad man....and a damn shame. Don't know why you can't do the minimal research required to verify problem areas and then respond honestly...clearly you can do selective research.

 

Whoa. No need to set conspiracy theory defenses to Defcon 1. lol I thought that was a pretty reasonable question considering their source is questionable (Fox News) and 2. Their quote is both incomplete and misleading. But, I can see you are in one of those modes so I will leave you to bask in your newest 911 thread without interruption...

 

No spin intended I'm sure.

 

I wonder why you or Fox didn't quote any of this stuff....oh...that's right. It interferes with the truth. Wow....no demolition there! Really quiet too! Fair and balanced. Truth is another matter. Truth speaks for itself, if anybody bothered to pull their heads out of their *a**es, it'd be blatently obvious.

http://hidhist.wordpress.com/terror/911/wtc-7/911-first-responder-heard-wtc-7-demolition-countdown/

 

I believe only a true zealot and ideologue would see posting the rest of a quote left out in your linked article as 'spin' and 'interfering with the truth'. Which is why I no longer bother discussing any issues I have with the 'official' investigation into the matter on this site or in your threads. You do a pretty good job of talking to yourself about it anyway so that is no loss.

 

So, I'll ask this again as it was brought up in another thread...Is FOX News a credible source or not? It's the height of hypocrisy to tout FOX News as the ultimate authority as you do here while proclaiming it to be garbage in your other posts.

So which is it?

 

Except that you didn't actually comment on the larger point.. the FACT that demolition occurred in the first place after being discussed ahead of time. In fact you didn't comment on it at all. Instead, you tried to shift the emphasis, to re-focus on a much smaller, unimportant side issue, trying to infer, as I read it, something sinister about leaving out an important part of a quote...like it mattered against the bigger issue. Then you further respond with an excuse as to why you "no longer bother discussing" any issues with the official investigation, providing you an easy out. Ridicule, discredit, ignore...rather than engaging in the obvious and complete distortion of the truth of the incident. Because it's indefensible so you don't dare try. Much easier to ridicule and go along with the sheep rather than take any stands. I do understand the mentality. It is more common than dirt amongst anti-truthers.
I will continue to post what I believe is important as I see it. Whether you or anyone else responds is completely predictable, safe and secure for you, so suit yourself. Like I said...it's common. I have gotten contacts who appreciate reading some of the publicly available information I point to, so I will continue, as it matters to me to awaken some rather than none, which I heave already done.

 

Quoting Fox points out yours and other Fox watchers hypocrisy. I only referenced them because of the hypocrisy it points out, in an obviously vain attempt to highlight that hypocrisy that you and other lemmings swear such allegiance to.
So which is it? Here ya go Sparky. Fox IS garbage. The fact that they may, on occasion, reproduce some fact repeated or some otherwise very well known truth, doesn't make them any closer to an actual news "source"...rather, words like..lemming...spinster..biased...dishonest...come to mind.

 

Sorry but when I read the headder for this thread I was under the impression that Fox news had admitted that it blew WTC7

 

Understandable De Orc. Hard to put everything in a header. It does help to illustrate my contention though, that folks skim over headlines...don't bother to look very deep, even when the information is very readily available to them. So thanks! People need things in a soundbite. Hopefully that will change...hopefully soon.

 

Good one!
I still like how tomconspiracy will make post after post about how everything FOX News reports is garbage yet as soon as FOX reports something that he believes helps prove his delusions they suddenly become the ultimate source.

 

Yeah, you are right. I just posted the small, unimportant, side issue where the first hand witness said there were no explosions. The first hand witness, by the way, who was being quoted in the link you posted. lol Yeah, just a small unimportant side issue there.

And that is why it is meaningless to even discuss an issue like this with someone who believes religiously. They have no ability for rational thinking. No intellectual honesty. 911 is your religion and I don't debate religion.

 

The very same witness that said Mr. Sliverstein was discussing demolition prior to it actually being demolished. Imagine that! Talking about demolishing a building and then it is actually demolished. I don't know about the religion part, but you do seem to have a very selective issue with the truth. You need to drop the "fair and balanced" posturing.

 

And also a small, unimportant, side issue, provided by the first hand witness who was being quoted in the link you posted which totally contradicts your thread title.

 

Perhaps if you wandered a bit past titles and headlines, you'd have a better understanding of the truth...that is, if you're truly interested in the truth. Not your primary interest though..I understand.

 

DEMOLITION,and it's discussion PRIOR TO the event, was the point of the link. Your spin attempt contradicts truth. DEMOLITION. Click it and reread it. Oh...that's right!! You don't argue with religions! Demolition....open the lid and look inside...you can do it. I know you can.

 

Fox admits WTC7 demolition

While I was talking with a fellow reporter and several NYPD officers, Building 7 suddenly collapsed, and before it hit the ground, not a single sound emanated from the tower area. There were no explosives; I would have heard them. In fact, I remember that in those few seconds, as the building sank to the ground that I was stunned by how quiet it was.

 

Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
This completely contradicts NIST’s report that the building came down due to internal fires, and adds to the damning evidence that we were not told the truth about what happened that day.

NEWSFLASH...NEWSFLASH...wiring a building for implosion takes weeks, sometimes months to complete.
NEWSFLASH..NEWSFLASH....If they were going to take down the building that day, it had to have been pre-wired well in advance.