Re: Spankity Spank On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote: > Timmay! wrote: > >> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >> >>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>> >>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem: >>>>> >>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with >>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my >>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> >>>>> >>>>> Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you >>>>> were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's >>>>> your point, exactly? >>>> >>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>> >>>>> You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>> >>>>> @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>> pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>> hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>> will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>> >>> First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>> else). >> >> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky. >> >> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that >> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend >> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me. >> >> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv") >> >> Yeah right. > > All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual > spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic. It's all those virtual buttocks. -- tinmimus99@hotmail.com smeeter 11 or maybe 12 mp 10 mhm 29x13 Sir, your wife, under pretence of keeping a bawdy-house, is a receiver of stolen goods. < Johnson
Re: Spankity Spank mimus wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote: > >> Timmay! wrote: >> >>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>> >>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with >>>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my >>>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> >>>>>> >>>>>> Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you >>>>>> were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your >>>>>> point, exactly? >>>>> >>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>>> >>>>>> You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>>> >>>>>> @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>> pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>> hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>> will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>>> >>>> First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything else). >>> >>> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky. >>> >>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that >>> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend >>> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me. >>> >>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv") >>> >>> Yeah right. >> >> All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual spanking >> you attempt on each other. Pathetic. > > It's all those virtual buttocks. They could at least put on some virtual underpants. -- Tim Weaver "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind- boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." - Gene Spafford, 1992
Re: Dimmy: Spankity Spanked Spankard Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in news:s4bo54hj7ih9ku9bl2v43a71r8fb14cavc@4ax.com: >>> >>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>> >>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>> >>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >> >>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>else). > > I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did PPOSTFU, spankard. TIA
Re: Spankity Spank mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote in news:YYCdncmZA67trsHVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@giganews.com: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote: > >> Timmay! wrote: >> >>> >>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv") >>> >>> Yeah right. >> >> All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual >> spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic. > > It's all those virtual buttocks. Dimmy likes spankings because they're good for his butt-mushroom crop.
Re: Spankity Spank On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote: >Timmay! wrote: > >> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem: >>>> [...] >>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with >>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my >>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> >>>>> >>>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you were >>>>>any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your point, >>>>>exactly? >>>> >>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>> >>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>> >>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>> >>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything else). >> >> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky. >> >> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about >> that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to >> contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me. >> >> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv") >> >> Yeah right. > >All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual spanking >you attempt on each other. Pathetic. Nice self-spank. -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) COOSN-266-06-02374 Hammer of Thor, April 2005 PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle X 2 #9 People ruining UseNet lits. #6 Top Assholes on the Net lits. #5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time #15 AUK psychos and felons lits #5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
Re: Spankity Spank On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:55:33 -0400, K.A.Cannon wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Timmay! wrote: >> >>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem: >>>>> [...] >>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and >>>>>>> with at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except >>>>>>> my posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> >>>>>> >>>>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you >>>>>>were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your >>>>>>point, exactly? >>>>> >>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>>> >>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>>> >>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>>> >>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>>>else). >>> >>> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky. >>> >>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that >>> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend >>> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me. >>> >>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv") >>> >>> Yeah right. >> >>All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual >>spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic. > > Nice self-spank. *SPANK* -- #1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007 #1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007 #10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004 Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, May 2008 COOSN-266-06-25794
Re: Spankity Spank Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote: >They could at least put on some virtual underpants. We know you have a hairy sprout fetish, don't try and deny it. -- Timmay! "I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in <77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Re: Spankity Spank gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>> >>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>> >>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>> >>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>>else). >> >> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did > >PPOSTFU Sure. "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> If you want to prove you're not spanked, post a verifiable list of all your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame. If you don't, then you've got something to hide and you're spanked. Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me. Thanks for playing. -- Timmay! "You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>
Re: Dimmy: Spankity Spanked Spankard Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in news:38ar541q5jgks6tcdt3sttbk2fmfst13rr@4ax.com: > gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: > >>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>>> >>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>>> >>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>>> >>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>>>else). >>> >>> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >> >>PPOSTFU > > <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled. > If [pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof] You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of proof is on you. Once again: PPOSTFU > post a verifiable list of all > your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame. You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them got spanked. Now, for the *second* time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame that immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting under, and the nym that disappeared.
Re: Spankity Spank gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >> >>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>>>> >>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single >>>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They >>>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. >>>>> >>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>>>>else). >>>> >>>> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* did >>> >>>PPOSTFU >> >> <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> > >All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled. "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> You're spanked. >> If >[pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof] "Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now." You're spanked. >You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of proof >is on you. > >Once again: PPOSTFU "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> You're spanked. >> post a verifiable list of all your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame. > >You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them got >spanked. You can easily claim a spank if your target: @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. You're spanked. >Now, for the *second* time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame that >immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting under, and >the nym that disappeared. Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that. Well? -- Timmay! "I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in <77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Re: Spankity Spank Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in news:nec0645a44km1hdajt12nk8cjmt38u78j9@4ax.com: > gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false >>>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a >>>>>>>>single hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a >>>>>>>>newbie. They will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence >>>>>>>>shows otherwise. >>>>>> >>>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything >>>>>>else). >>>>> >>>>> I'm not claiming *I* spanked you out of alt.flame, but *somebody* >>>>> did >>>> >>>>PPOSTFU >>> >>> <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> >> >>All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled. > > "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with > at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my > posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> > > You're spanked. You're trolled. >>> If >>[pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof] > > "Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some > of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past > decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now." > > You're spanked. Uh, dumbass, that was *me* spanking *you*. >>You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of >>proof is on you. >> >>Once again: PPOSTFU > > "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with > at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my > posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1> > > You're spanked. You're trolled. >>> post a verifiable list of all your nyms since you've been posting to >>> alt.flame. >> >>You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them >>got spanked. > > You can easily claim a spank if your target: > > @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false > pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single > hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They > will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise. Too bad you can't show where anyone made that happen. > You're spanked. > >>Now, for the *second* time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame >>that immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting >>under, and the nym that disappeared. > > Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that. In order to claim spankage, you already need to have such a list,
Re: Spankity Spank gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: >Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote: >> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote: [...] >> "Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some >> of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past >> decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now." >> >> You're spanked. > >Uh, dumbass, that was *me* spanking *you*. Your criteria for that spank was snipping and evading, but now you're snipping and evading you're obviously spanked by your own criteria Problems understanding that, spanky? [...] >> You're spanked. >> >>>Now, for the *second* time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame >>>that immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting >>>under, and the nym that disappeared. >> >> Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that. > >In order to claim spankage, you already need to have such a list, I'm not claiming spank. I'm claiming you're a spankard. Your statement verifies that you're a spankard. How many times do we have to go through this until you understand it, spanky? -- Timmay! "I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in <77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Re: Gerboperv, silly, furry little homo, and those confusing atrribution things. On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:22:36 -0500, St. Raoul Xemblinosky <saintraoul@catholic.org> wrote: >On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:11:38 -0800, Onideus Mad Hatter ><usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:59:56 -0500, "dracosilv" >><dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote: >> >>>> And any *normal* human being would consider that disgusting. >> >>>And who's to say what's normal? >> >>"normal" is whatever he is and everyone else isn't. In other words, >>how he rapes his sister...yeah, he considers that to be "normal" in >>his little world. > >Speaking of which, Amor says you like it up the ass. Well that's generally where shit liak you belongs, up my ass, however it's kind of a temporary placement...until I flush. LOL -- Onideus Mad Hatter mhm ? x ? http://www.backwater-productions.net http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog Hatter Quotes ------------- "Don't ever fuck with someone who has more creativity than you do." "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the best." "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you with it." "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist." "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend." "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!" "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my bad." "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..." "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols." "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?" "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others of its relevancy." "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper." "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are." "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just givin em out for free." "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little mess." "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny little minds'." "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts." "Those who record history are those who control history." "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for you." "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head." "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a function?" "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users." "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww, gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
Re: Gerboperv, silly, furry little homo, and those confusing atrribution things. On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:38 -0500, St. Raoul Xemblinosky <saintraoul@catholic.org> wrote: >On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:01:41 -0800, Onideus Mad Hatter ><usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:51:35 -0500, St. Raoul Xemblinosky >><saintraoul@catholic.org> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:26:25 -0500, "dracosilv" >>><dracosilver@wi.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>>>'Menjy' wrote: >>>>> dracosilv wrote: >>>>>> 'Menjy' wrote: >>>>>>> gerboperv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> You're the one that likes gerbils, >>>>> >>>>> Really? Where did I say that? >>>> >>>>Well maybe not like, so much as obcess over. >>>> >>>>Here's an example of the earliest (and I think the origin of) your >>>>facination with gerbils. >>> >>>Bzzzt. No "facination" there, son. Just a good healthy dose of >>>contempt for anyone who so hated being a human being that he would >>>voluntarily dress up as a fucking hamster. You will have to try again. >> >>It's very well known fact that those who are the most vocal and >>frothing the most blind hatred of something are in fact closet fans of >>whatever interest it happens to be. > >Which explains your bizarre fixation with my ass. This from the queer who goes around asking his friends and enemies if they "like it up the ass". -- Onideus Mad Hatter mhm ? x ? http://www.backwater-productions.net http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog Hatter Quotes ------------- "Don't ever fuck with someone who has more creativity than you do." "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the best." "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you with it." "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist." "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend." "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!" "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my bad." "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..." "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols." "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?" "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others of its relevancy." "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper." "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are." "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just givin em out for free." "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little mess." "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny little minds'." "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts." "Those who record history are those who control history." "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for you." "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head." "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a function?" "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users." "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww, gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
