Darrelll Issa pledges to undo Obama's wasteful, big government agenda

He chose to testify. He wasn't "held under" anything. During the testimony that he agreed to give, he perjured himself. That was the disgrace.

Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office.

You know, Clinton's not a king. He's an American citizen - nothing more, nothing less. He was and is governed by the same laws that you and I are governed by.

 

So then you are good with George's lies, just not Clintons. Thanks for clarifying.

 

Oh, I'm sorry. Please remind me in which civil case George Bush perjured himself.

 

Oh I see..."a civil case" would be the defining parameter acceptable when a President lies us into war. I beg your pardon. Killing citizens by forcing us into preemptive, completely avoidable war hasn't anything to do with sexual promiscuity. That's far worse. Got it.

 

Pardon me, I thought I was addressing craiga's comments regarding Clinton and his civil lawsuit not Bush's faulty advisers.

 

He installed those faulty advisers (even if it weren't for the fact that attacking Iraq was a scheduled event prior to the criminal's installation into office by daddy's supreme court golfing buddies).

 

OK, I've queued up the Twilight Zone theme song and re-read your post.. Now it makes sense.

 

I bet reruns of the twilight zone run repeatedly at the RNC, don't they?

 

You can do better than that, Tom. It reminds me of kids saying, "I know you are, but what am I"?

 

Sorry...I sometimes fall to the level of those I am amused with.

 

Yet another Pee Wee Herman comment. I think you're full of... them.

 

Theeeeere we go. Did you get it all out?

 

I think so, thanks for asking. It looks like one Democrat, two Socialists and half a Progressive.

 

Oh you're very welcome my friend.