Ok Jack. Insults stopped. Starting fresh sounds good. I don't think you'll find that I'll ever have any better opinion on the right than I do now. Unless somebody completely different appears out of the smoke and mirrors and demonstrates differently to me than have their predecessors, I'll continue my philosophy towards their projected mentality indefinitely. What you call hate in me Jack..I call reasoned pessimism. It doesn't consume me quite in the fashion you may believe that it does. I've learned simple, non debatable conclusions, IMO, concerning your party's motives. Greed. Plain and simple. Great wealth above all else. That's their philosophy, and I reject it. Are the dems any better? Not by leaps and bounds for sure, but, as I've said in the past, they do, on occasion, lend a helping hand to the common man. The right's answer is always, get rich like us, you'll like it too. Simple fact of life is we can't all be rich. Once again, the right caters to the rich, unapologetically. IMO, the rich constitute the worst of the problems in achieving "more" . Day 78 in the gulf clearly shine a big light on the problems with massive profit above all else, and that's what the right represents. That's not for me Jack. Until another party (and not the rebranded right's tea party version) is able to get hold of the moral reigns, I'm stuck with the left's representitives, because again, as I've said, the right can be at times exponentially worse. Right now there are two parties that are electable. The right represent the rich...thats not me...so that leaves me with one. Enough said.
No follow up Jack? Maybe you were simply interested in squashing the 300,000 thing versus anything else? Congratulations.